Difference between revisions of "User talk:SBS3720L"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Sharebus: new section)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== RE: Recently registered A95s ==
== Reply: 161 Deployments ==
Hi.


Hi,
Thanks for taking your time to synchronise all of your edits. Really appreciate it.


I saw that you edit 6226P, 6233T to 6236K being posted to BNDEP for service 39 amendment. However, these buses did not appear on 39 since its amendment yesterday. So, where did you get this assumption from?
However I have reverted all edits made for services 80 89 102 161 163 as user '962' has added several false redeployments, like full A95 fleet for 161 which is obviously not true.


Yours sincerely,<br>
I believe they want to clock the A95 mileage on 161 and redeploy those high mileage buses to the other services.
Razerboii.
 
I can help reinstate all of your edits, assuming that they are true.
 
You may go ahead and change the deployments accordingly as well if you'd like to.
 
Thanks.
 
== Sharebus ==
 
Hi, are you aware that SBST has introduced a sharebus system? that 6046E should be a sharebus rather than a crossover looking at the post

Latest revision as of 12:08, 2 May 2024

Reply: 161 Deployments[edit]

Hi.

Thanks for taking your time to synchronise all of your edits. Really appreciate it.

However I have reverted all edits made for services 80 89 102 161 163 as user '962' has added several false redeployments, like full A95 fleet for 161 which is obviously not true.

I believe they want to clock the A95 mileage on 161 and redeploy those high mileage buses to the other services.

I can help reinstate all of your edits, assuming that they are true.

You may go ahead and change the deployments accordingly as well if you'd like to.

Thanks.

Sharebus[edit]

Hi, are you aware that SBST has introduced a sharebus system? that 6046E should be a sharebus rather than a crossover looking at the post