From SgWiki

Editing Lucky[[1]] ..my lucky hat alongside a pure white roadside mushroom I ever seen here in Singapore..seen it to believe!

[edit] SEE_ING DOUBLE

• LUCKY CAN MEANS blessings from God, such white food was collected daily by the ancient Jews caught in the desert wilderness where food and water was hard to find..

• Lucky means good fortune, by a slim chance and he was lucky to escape alive,

..he won the ten million draw with a small bet of $1.oo he was damned lucky LOR!

• Our great leader Mr. Lee was a Lucky gentleman and he never lose an election..but he will if he continue on to provoke or promote narrow interests of a few people who always supported him and had grown fat..all these years!

• Our jackpot prize today now stands at Sing $5.500,000' for this coming draw on 10:21, 22 May 2007 (SGT), and our Minister Mentor takes home pay for the year (yearly income) is at least $3Million, so I said he's still very lucky, and don't even need to bet on Toto to win!20:25, 17 May 2007 (SGT)Do you know how long will we as a family spends on housing, food, etc expenses for a year? Ok, let see

[edit] Let's see how lucky we are cp MM.LKY

Our family needs: (Food - $50.50 per day) (Utilities & transport(bus&Mrt) - $180.01 per month) (Phone bills & internet connection - $69.99) (Extra Spending money - $5.00 per day on 4d & Toto bets) (Insurances & housing - $890.33 per month) (Charity giving - $20.13 per day) so every month we need at least.. (e.g. food & daily expenses plus all in)-$2,930 (per mth)

and we still have $970 at least (4savings) for rainy days per mth.(Our income or pay $5,000)

(So u see we r worry free all year round, no anxieties about food, cloths etc see our Bible verse to follow: Matthew 6:33}

In one year we need $5K times 12 - only 60K to live comfortably on the little Island..: Alien ^talk 12:43, 18 May 2007 (SGT)

In 10 years (1/10 our enlongated (100yrs) lifetime ) - we need about $600,000 for our family (say inclusive of flat inflations - zero inflation factor)

• In one hundred years we need only 6 millions to live well..(a little ex-agerrations, none live that long nowadays, with all the toxics in the air, water & food etc..)

10 families for a whole life time(like us) will need 60 millions in all

5 such families will need 30 millions in their lifetimes...that BTW is how much Mr. Lucky gets to serve the country for another ten years if he lives to that long..so I sincerely wish him long life mr. Lucky to 120 plus..

[edit] NEWS:[[2]]From the Parliament House reporting on Benchmarking ministers' salaries

[edit] Benchmarking our ministers salaries? goto see NCMP Miss Sylvia Lim said, (the rest of the PAP seat like dumb dukes)[[3]]

[edit] Why the garmen had no choice

• Most people are working for the take home pay or their monthly wages, and a lot of people's & sentiments plus extra performances are co-related to the pay-cut or pay-rise. Some civil servants are doing their jobs efficiently (or not) NOT because of their loyalty or love for Singapore, just like the private businesses. Working for the garmen today is weak on such sentimental attachments {serve the people!}. The problem goes back to the minds or their money-mindedness of the garmen, their core-values are simply money, money, and money! Just like an onion without any core moral values. Out of the whole cabinet only the P.M. had the moral courage to stand up and say, "I will take a pay cut or pay cap for my increments etc.."
  

• The "opposition" or (better label as) "left wingers" are few in Parliament and that few are already committed to serve the people irregardless of money or pay-cut or pay-rise. They are committed to serve the aspirations as well as the desires, wants of the people. Those reasonable aspirations never really get pass the action stage! They see the huge pay increases among civil servants (they remain silent) however, when 2.7 million is increased to 3 millions for a pay rise, they took the opportunity to voice the huge gap between the big gap of those workers especially those who had never had benefited from such increments. (Private sector tried hard to follow the garmen CPF increments, however, "pay rise" is only related to profits, but any profits goes first to the owners or shareholders (dividends payout etc) and they seldom need to increase the rise in salaries unless they have no choices, that is, the last resort to keep their workers together and working with good morality and performances as expected).
  

• The debate or talk2 is okay in Parliament, but as Miss Sylvia Lim mentioned, their voices are for hearing and not for action under the parliamentary rule and policy as stated for the debate, in other words, it cheap talk2 already as stated by the ruling majority before it even stated. It was a performance to please some of the disgruntled people in Singapore.
  

• Mr. Chiam spoke well with the moral force of a committed "left winger" in Parliament there. His comparison of the garment with the NKF should taken seriously. The garmen already spent much time & effort to bring out those people who abused the charity funds. Some directors (NKF) are pursued to the point of bankruptcy, however suffice to say, the validity of comparison does break down at some points. One point is that the garmen are not exactly in charity but in business for the Country as a whole. Since 1959 to our times, the garmen were actively committed towards making money. They had made it, and become the richest nation on earth as far as any other Country here in Asia or elsewhere. They can afford to pay and pay well {unlike the charities on donations) however still dependent on taxes and garmen business investments (income) all over the world - not on the giving or donations. However, whose investment capital is it? That is a "good question" nobody had rise up! Think of the GIC or Temesek, Temesek just give away(???)$500 millions to help our neighbors or when Spore needs it. Whose money is it? The garmen cannot claim it has nothing to do with garmen's hand-in-it?? So far we had seen so many labels (GIC,Temasek etc Chippac SPC TLC etc etc trust funds etc) used to befuddle the minds of the public, there is more coming. So they it's garmen businesses for S'pore! S'pore is a nobody too.
  

• The garmen is not depended upon charity, it's the duty for all Singaporeans to pay their dues, and nobody can afford to get away. If you have millions in the banks, the taxmen want to know "how come?" so much. They asked. Mr. Chiam asked the logic of paying such amount to ministers and the cabinet, and MM Mr. LKY obviously disagreed strongly and even gets up to (emotionally) rebuttal the one opposition who dare to question the rationale. The simple reason that money in GIC and Temesek is still money obtained from the people. Those CEOs ( of GIC & Temasek..)are all (still) appointed by the action or under direction related to the Cabinet (esp LKY) and the garmen! The people (Singaporeans or citizens) may not have the right to operate it, but they still are the beneficiaries!
  

However, it (GIC & Temesek))will remain to be seen whether the labels will be changed again to "trust funds" "charity trusts" "Thomson trust" "trust for clever Pr kids"" (someone just told me it's already happening!!!)for ...garmen etc.. (clever, isn't it?) the rationale is to avoid mentioning it , or..it's their silent policy still working?:==It's big shame for Singapore==

goto see bak chor mee

[edit] [[4]]

[edit] Never tell to the people it's yours!

who know even of GIC until President elect {late Ong Teng Chong) revealed or told us about its existence!..?

All these talks in parliament are recorded for you to view in

[edit] Youtube

Mr.LKY yearly $3millions income for 10 years (30 millions) will pay for our Singaporean 5 families (total:25 persons) for a whole lifetime living comfortably & adequately in Singapore! Does he needed so much money, is he planning to go home with so much, ( even after everyone kick the bucket like everybody else,) I wonder? heheheheheHow many grandchildren (?) and children is he supporting and sponsoring?

(N.B. The more he gets, the merrier, I'm sure, he is planning to ..give more LOr!)I hope & pray he live long & be merry 2!

here's your lucky Pick>>[[5]]

[edit] Deja vu as in History

There are many rich family legacies, however their endurance is limited, (some said:"3 generations") Some may last longer, however the God who gives and also take away as He pleases. see His great displeasure So often we read of history as if it in the control of the invisible hand of AlmightyGod. Wealth, riches, power are all given by the Hand of Almighty indeed, and whoever displeases Him will find themselves in poor situations as if the Lord sitteth up there is laughing is saying:

{{trying to make sense}}

Try Again, your wealth and power 

hidden in secure trust funds?

Pre-prepared by a hosts of consultants, lawyers, bankers etc,etc..
with legal "everlasting" hidden caveats? &..
with earthly holes in the banks at DBS, OCBC, UOB?

Well, you could better hide them in my kingdom

where no thief could touch

nor steal...hhehehehehe

Come and let us reason together..