NPOV

From SgWiki

cs:Wikti csb:Słowôrz Wikiwords de:Wiktilogo en:WiktiLogo eo:Viki es:Wikci fr:Wiktion hi:शब्दकोष hu:Wiktion id:Wiktion ja:ウィクショナリー ko:Wiktion la:Victionarium ms:Wiktion nl:Wiktion pl:Wiktion pt:Wikcionário ro:Wiktion simple:Wiktionary su:Wiktionary sv:Wikipedia:Länka till ordboken Wiktionary zh:维基词典 talk:Alien|^talk]] 00:00, no date 2005 (UTC) an original article and copied partly to add-to-it! {{trying to make sense}}

HAPPY bIRTHDAY Mom :[[User:Terry|wowowow|]] 05:56, 26 August 2009 (SGT) May the Good Lord bless you with goodness health and strengthen you daily, I pray for you as much as I can though you have loved me brought me up, pay for my oversea schooling and still daily pray for me, I LOVE YOU mom!:[[User:Terry|wowowow|]] 05:56, 26 August 2009 (SGT)

..

[[<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cmcCLhPeVDM&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cmcCLhPeVDM&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]] goto see[[1]] then try to see my homemake movies.. which in turn puts the page in Category:Candidates for gook record

NPOV an acronym coined to fool all those weak minds that its purely all knowledge without any bias see POV. It stands for Neutral Point Of View

goto see POV

to read further lengthy elaborations on NPOV

see arrogant donkey

[edit] From wikipedia's founder POV

quote***about NPOV which it is claimed by almost all wikipedians(arrogant donkeys!)

• From Jimbo Wales, September 2003, on the mailing list:

If a viewpoint is in the majority, then it should be easy to substantiate it with reference to commonly accepted reference texts;

If a viewpoint is held by a significant minority, then it should be easy to name prominent adherents;

If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small (or vastly limited) minority, it doesn't belong in Wikipedia (except perhaps in some ancillary article) regardless of whether it's true or not; and regardless of whether you can prove it or not (see Wikipedia:Flat earth problem).

• Bias need not be conscious. For example, beginners in a field often fail to realize that what sounds like common sense is actually biased in favor of one particular view. (So we not infrequently need an expert in order to render the article entirely unbiased.) To take another example, writers can, without intent, propagate "geographical" bias, by for example describing a dispute as it is conducted in one country without knowing that the dispute is framed differently elsewhere.

• The policy of having a neutral point of view is not to hide different points of view, but to show the diversity of viewpoints. In case of controversy, the strong points and weak points will be shown according to each point of view, without taking a side. The neutral point of view is not a "separate but equal" policy. The facts, in themselves, are neutral, but the simple accumulation of them cannot be the neutral point of view. If only the favorable (or the unfavorable) facts of a point of view are shown in an article, the article will still be non-neutral.unquote***

A quote direct wikipedians' policy: "This page is an official policy on Wikipedia. It has wide acceptance among editors and is considered a standard that all users should follow. Feel free to update the page as needed, but make sure that changes you make to this policy really do reflect consensus, before you make them".

[edit] NKOV

WAHT'S nkov?

Alien does not claim any connections to them at wikipedias165.21.154.111 12:29, 5 November 2005 (SGT) The POV here is solely alien's, and no claims on Sgwiki as source, and nor reflecting wkipedians NPOV.. except where it is indicated a mirror or copied from there..Sgwiki is not wikipedians' but as indicated it does not belong to anyone, except the views of any contributors who subscripted at Sgwiki.