[edit] How do we see or understands?

[edit] cognition or re-cognition maybe pre-recognition too?

[edit] Examples

1. A person understands the weather if he/she is able to predict and to give an explanation of some of its features, etc.
2. A psychiatrist understands another person's anxieties if he/she knows that person's anxieties, their causes, and can give useful advice on how to cope with the anxiety.
3. A person understands a command if he/she knows who gave it, what is expected by the issuer, and whether the command is legitimate.
4. One understands a reasoning, an argument, or a language if one can consciously reproduce the information content conveyed by the message.

[edit] Is understanding definable?

It is difficult to define understanding. If we use the term concept however, the question then arises as to what is a concept? Is it an abstract thing? Is it a brain pattern or a rule? Whatever definition is proposed, we can still ask how it is that we understand the thing that is featured in the definition: we can never satisfactorily define a concept, still less use it to explain understanding.

It's just like Chicken and the Egg, which comes first?

(see sight or hearing or knowing }

[edit] How about the mind how did we have it and not animals? Yes both have brains but the animal-type-of-brains found inside a homo sapien will be classified as dyfunctional!

kind

[edit] Proof of God

[edit] ....

[edit] The Chinese Room argument is a thought experiment designed by John Searle (1980) as a counterargument to claims made by supporters of strong artificial intelligence (see also functionalism)

[edit] Can you see the picture?

It's says, "The Chinese Room" or (中 国 空 间)

Man kind OR mANKIND

The magician explains:

What psychological and philosophical significance should we attach to recent efforts at computer simulations of human cognitive capacities? In answering this question, I find it useful to distinguish what I will call "strong" AI from "weak" or "cautious" AI (artificial intelligence). According to weak AI, the principal value of the computer in the study of the mind is that it gives us a very powerful tool. For example, it enables us to formulate and test hypotheses in a more rigorous and precise fashion. But according to strong AI, the computer is not merely a tool in the study of the mind; rather, the appropriately programmed computer really is a mind, in the sense that computers given the right programs can be literally said to understand and have other cognitive states. In strong AI, because the programmed computer has cognitive states, the programs are not mere tools that enable us to test psychological explanations; rather, the programs are themselves the explanations.

I have no objection to the claims of weak AI, at least as far as this article is concerned. My discussion here will be directed at the claims I have defined as those of strong AI, specifically the claim that the appropriately programmed computer literally has cognitive states and that the programs thereby explain human cognition. When I hereafter refer to AI, I have in mind the strong version, as expressed by these two claims.

中 国 空 间

中国空间论调-约翰塞尔(PAS)思想(1984)及相关实验推导--是最知名、广记柜台债权人工智能(AI),即以声称或至少可以做电脑(终有一天可能)的想法. 据塞尔的原套的说法是基于两个事实:大脑造成心灵、句法语义学并不足够. 精锐塞尔配音"强爱":"据强劲哎,"据塞尔、"电脑不仅仅是一个工具学习心,而适度的电脑程控心目中真正的意思,是一个电脑程序,可以赋予权利字面上表示理解和其他认知国"(1980a,417页).塞尔反差"强爱"到"弱爱".据艾薄弱,据塞尔、计算机模拟只是思想,他们似乎没有真正理解(正如如果)认识,因为他们似乎计算,若以等;然而,计算机模拟研究是有益心(如天气、学习等).

之前提到，Searle 不認為人造的系統可以產生意識。他的「中文室（Chinese Room）」思考實驗，就是設計來證明一個系統可以展現出看起來有智慧的行為，但完全不懂自己在做什麼，也不可能有意識。

(translation to above response/reply)

Although the individual in the Chinese room does not understand Chinese, perhaps the person and the room, including the rule book, considered together as a system, do.

[edit] related link

artificial intelligence

versus Good Old Fashioned Artificial Intelligence (acronyms)

Research in AI is concerned with producing machines to automate tasks requiring intelligent behavior. Examples include control, planning and scheduling, the ability to answer diagnostic and consumer questions, handwriting, natural language, speech and facial recognition.

As such, the study of AI has also become an engineering discipline, focused on providing solutions to real life problems, knowledge mining, software applications, strategy games like computer chess and other video games. One of the biggest difficulties with AI is that of comprehension.

Many devices have been created that can do amazing things, but critics of AI claim that no actual comprehension by the AI machine has taken place.

[edit] Examples:

• LINK TO THE MIND AND THE 3RD DIMENSIONAL REALITY
• 1991 AI logistics systems deployed in the first Gulf War save the US more money than spent on all AI research since 1950.
• 1997 The Deep Blue chess machine (IBM) beats the world chess champion, Garry Kasparov.
• 1999 Sony introduces the AIBO, an artificially intelligent pet.
• 2000 Computer game, The Sims, is released after 5 years in development. Sporting a highly advanced Artificial Intelligence program, The Sims becomes the best selling computer game of all time, with various expansion packs and a sequel released shortly after.
• 2004 DARPA introduces the DARPA Grand Challenge requiring competitors to produce autonomous vehicles for prize money

[edit] Query

what's the differences and inferences of digital and analogy systems?

what's the differences between the sizes and meanings of the brains versus machines (computers)?

Here is a sample:(via understanding from Computer programs)

以下是一些重要的提示 1. 我至少18岁了. 2. 据我所知,只有网上的内容可能包括攻击性的语言和意见,这是纯粹的作家/专栏作家/贡献者或whosoever这里的贡献,而不是sgwiki在线. 通过阅读这我已获释,并已出院的供应商,拥有和创造sgwiki从网上任何责任可能出现从我使用的网站.(which BTW will take you half a day to figure out unless..you goto see the original from Sgwiki Main Page)

[edit] Here are some important pointers

1. I am at least 18 years old .
2. I understand online only content may include offensive language and opinions which are solely those of the writer/columnist/contributor or whosoever contribute here and not Sgwiki Online.
3. By reading this I have released and discharged the providers, owners and creators of Sgwiki Online from any and all liability which may arise from my use of the site.
   

[edit] Cross-Cultural Communication

[edit] It takes me half a day to setup and fix a new computer set, however, it will take several decades to develop a good mind