User talk:TIB965Z

2016-06-25T11:46:06Z

Jason Lam:

== Re: About 828L and 829J ==
Hi TIB965Z.

Yes indeed, both buses have been laid up (aka awaiting de-registration) at their respective depots. However, there might be a possibility that SMRT is pasting the red logo on the exterior of both buses, like how I concluded back then where TIB904A was "laid up" as of 14 October 2015 but in the end SMRT pasted the red logos on the bus which was totally unexpected. I apologise for not being consistent in my editings, but I will temporarily edit both statuses as Spare Buses. If both buses are not going to be on revenue service in two weeks' time, I will then update both statuses as Awaiting De-registration.

==Re:Editing enquiries==
Hi TIB965Z,

Regarding to your quires about whether to list them in, I would strongly suggest so only if the BSEP buses had been on revenue service before like the non-BSEP buses. This is due to consistency work when editing after the "BSEP" rule for editing on sgWiki had been lifted.

Thanks & Regards

-[[User:Supernutorcrazy|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User Talk:Supernutorcrazy|Talk]]) 20 December 2015 23:12 (SGT)

==Re: [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS3602U&oldid=346313#TT_edits TT edits]==

I believe so too. Those are probably nonsensical edits. While I don't spot TT much myself, just judging from his/her editing patterns (every services have "spare buses", every services have no missing buses, etc.) is enough to tell you those are false edits. He/She has even edited service 183 that has not been handed over either... My [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Services_106_-_189&curid=26253&diff=346314&oldid=346279 edits] were reverted by him today.

He/she should be reported for ban if he/she continues.

--[[User:SBS3602U|SBS3602U]] ([[User talk:SBS3602U|talk]]) 11:50, 25 June 2016 (SGT)

:Hi. I personally work under Tower Transit and merely adding in correct information as of 20/06/2016. Please refrain from criticizing my edits. Cheers.

User talk:SBS3602U

2016-06-25T11:37:57Z

Jason Lam:

==May 2016==
Is samtlk's information on SgForums accurate? You also revert my edit? [[User:(SBS3107H)|SBS3107H]][[User talk:SBS3107H|talk]] 19:36, 29 May 2016 (SGT)
<div style="margin-left:20px">
===Reply===
[https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS3107H&oldid=343548#Reply_to_this √ Replied]

: His information are with effect from 29 May 2016 or today. So yeah, I think you need to check the quantity of buses. [[User:(SBS3107H)|SBS3107H]][[User talk:SBS3107H|talk]] 21:43, 29 May 2016 (SGT)
</div>
==..==
Hi.

Do you know anything about SMB1367X? Someone said it got involved in an accident and being laid out, but I am not sure about this.

SMB1368T
<div style="margin-left:20px">
===Reply===
[https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SMB1368T&oldid=343737#Reply_to_this √ Replied]
</div>

== TT edits ==

Good morning,

I believe Jason Lam's edits on the TT deployments by service pages are all fake. I believe 189 actually have some perm B9TLs. Same goes for 66. What do you think? --[[User:TIB965Z|TIB965Z]] ([[User talk:TIB965Z|talk]]) 10:29, 25 June 2016 (SGT)

:Hi. I personally work under Tower Transit and merely adding in correct information as of 20/06/2016. Please refrain from criticizing my edits. Cheers.

SgWiki - User contributions [en]

User talk:TIB965Z

User talk:SBS3602U