SgWiki:Renaming for SG3100M (Poll/Discussion) - Revision history

SMB315C at 02:58, 6 November 2021

2021-11-06T02:58:42Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Starter Post==
 Hi.
@@ Line 46: / Line 55: @@
 —SMB315C ([[User talk:SMB315C|talk]], administrator)
 ==Your Opinion Below==

2021-11-04T13:42:18Z

Opinion 6 (by Lim Jia Ting)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 4 November 2021
Line 86:		Line 86:
	===Opinion 6 (by Lim Jia Ting)===		===Opinion 6 (by Lim Jia Ting)===
	I honestly feel that SG3100M can be changed to "MAN NL323F (Retrofitted Electric)" as it was once a MAN A22 (Batch 2) (BSEP) bus.		I honestly feel that SG3100M can be changed to "MAN NL323F (Retrofitted Electric)" as it was once a MAN A22 (Batch 2) (BSEP) bus.


			Also, putting it as option 2 would confuse some as the body is a MAN Lion City Hybrid.

2021-10-28T09:51:44Z

Your Opinion Below

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:51, 28 October 2021
Line 83:		Line 83:
	Regards,<br>		Regards,<br>
	Aravindhan Ravikumar		Aravindhan Ravikumar

			===Opinion 6 (by Lim Jia Ting)===
			I honestly feel that SG3100M can be changed to "MAN NL323F (Retrofitted Electric)" as it was once a MAN A22 (Batch 2) (BSEP) bus.

2021-10-20T09:39:53Z

Opinion 5 (by GoAheadAmbassador): Insert paragraph

2021-10-20T09:39:13Z

Your Opinion Below: My opinion on SG3100M since it is reflected as MAN NL323F (A22) in OneMotoring

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:39, 20 October 2021
Line 73:		Line 73:
	===Opinion 4 (by Wekelwrady)===		===Opinion 4 (by Wekelwrady)===
	In my opinion, I will think that "MAN NL323F (Retrofitted Electric)" will be a suitable name, since it is still labelled as MAN A22 in OM.		In my opinion, I will think that "MAN NL323F (Retrofitted Electric)" will be a suitable name, since it is still labelled as MAN A22 in OM.

			===Opinion 5 (by GoAheadAmbassador)===
			Hi,

			In my opinion, I would feel that "MAN NL323F (Retrofitted Electric)" will be a more suitable name, since it was once a Batch 2 NL323F (SMB3075A) as OneMotoring reflected it as a MAN NL323F (A22). Putting it as ST Engineering Retrofitted Electric Bus will mislead others into thinking that it is solely built by ST Engineering.

			Thank you.

			Regards,
			Aravindhan Ravikumar

2021-10-14T15:38:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:38, 14 October 2021
Line 70:		Line 70:

	Hence, renaming it to "MAN NL323F (Retrofitted Electric)" or listing the bus under the original "MAN NL323F (Euro V) (Batch 2)" page would be the most appropriate as it would accurately reflect the bus model as per LTA's official registration records. An added benefit for listing the buses under their original pages is that it would also cover situations where conversions are performed for the same model across different batches, where the buses could still be reflected as part of their original order.		Hence, renaming it to "MAN NL323F (Retrofitted Electric)" or listing the bus under the original "MAN NL323F (Euro V) (Batch 2)" page would be the most appropriate as it would accurately reflect the bus model as per LTA's official registration records. An added benefit for listing the buses under their original pages is that it would also cover situations where conversions are performed for the same model across different batches, where the buses could still be reflected as part of their original order.

			===Opinion 4 (by Wekelwrady)===
			In my opinion, I will think that "MAN NL323F (Retrofitted Electric)" will be a suitable name, since it is still labelled as MAN A22 in OM.

2021-10-10T19:28:54Z

Your Opinion Below

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:28, 11 October 2021
Line 65:		Line 65:
	Regards,		Regards,
	Antarcticite		Antarcticite

			===Opinion 3 (by Ihengheng)===
			In my opinion, I think the way forward is to consider how such buses would be listed if the trial is successful. The limitation with the current naming is that ST is not the manufacturer of the drivetrain, and even by renaming the page to solely reflect the buses as a Linkker product, the page would easily get messy if different manufacturer's buses are sent for the same conversion. As such, I feel that the best option is to either have specific pages for each converted model or by listing them under their original pages.

			Hence, renaming it to "MAN NL323F (Retrofitted Electric)" or listing the bus under the original "MAN NL323F (Euro V) (Batch 2)" page would be the most appropriate as it would accurately reflect the bus model as per LTA's official registration records. An added benefit for listing the buses under their original pages is that it would also cover situations where conversions are performed for the same model across different batches, where the buses could still be reflected as part of their original order.

2021-10-09T03:18:03Z

2021-10-09T01:41:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:41, 9 October 2021
Line 57:		Line 57:

	BusFan74		BusFan74

			Hi.

			I would feel that “MAN NL323F (Retrofitted Electric)” would be a better representation since it does belong to the category of Batch 3 buses. Moreover, it is also once an Batch 3 A22 (SMB3075A) and putting it as ST Engineering Electric bus would mislead others into thinking that the bus is solely built by ST Engineering.

			Regards,
			Antarcticite

2021-10-09T00:33:35Z

Opinion 1 (by )

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:33, 9 October 2021
Line 49:		Line 49:
	==Your Opinion Below==		==Your Opinion Below==
	===Opinion 1 (by )===		===Opinion 1 (by )===

			Hi

			My opinion for the ST Engineering Retrofitted Electric Bus is that since there are no badging in front and back of the Retrofitted Electric Bus, so my option I suggest will be option 2 because I feel that this bus retains the MAN Lion City Hybrid bodywork, it has now converted into Electric Bus, so I considered my choice to be ST Engineering-Linkker Electric Bus as my option since it was part of the ST Engineering project with Linkker to convert into a Electric Bus as a proof a concept.

			Regards

			BusFan74