User talk:Apex-LW'21 - Revision history

Apex-LW'21 at 00:19, 9 March 2020

2020-03-09T00:19:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:19, 9 March 2020
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Please write your message below this line. Thank you.<br>		Please write your message below this line. Thank you.<br>
	----		----

	~~== regarding moderator ==~~

	Hi

	~~is it possible to look into the action of the moderator SBS3107H?~~
	~~lot of wrong edits being done previously (such as editing all buses are under UPDEP when Ulu Pandan package start, assuming SG1848 is under UPDEP etc etc)?~~

	~~and right now, he lock the B5LH page and revert some one else edit on new registration of B5LH? there are new B5LH registered and thus the info is correct, but he undo the edit and lock the page?~~
	~~what is the reason of doing so? only he can edit to add in the new registration?~~

	~~thank you~~
	~~lemon1974 12/3/19~~

	~~==Reply==~~

	~~Apologies for the late reply.<br>~~

	~~With regards to his recent edits, you may wish to clarify with user SBS3107H directly on his talk page.<br>~~

	~~Thanks & Regards,<br>~~
	~~--[[User:Apex-LW'21\|Apex-LW'21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW'21\|talk]]) 11:18, 8 April 2019 (+08)~~

DarkNight at 02:50, 12 November 2019

2019-11-12T02:50:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:50, 12 November 2019
Line 41:		Line 41:
	Thanks & Regards,<br>		Thanks & Regards,<br>
	--[[User:Apex-LW'21\|Apex-LW'21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW'21\|talk]]) 11:18, 8 April 2019 (+08)		--[[User:Apex-LW'21\|Apex-LW'21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW'21\|talk]]) 11:18, 8 April 2019 (+08)

	~~== Redirect: sgWiki Guidebook: Rules ==~~

	~~Hi.~~

	~~I've noticed that Chapter 2, 3, 6 and 7 are missing in the Rules section.~~

	~~Are those pages being worked on, going on an overhaul or going to be left blank until further notice?~~

	~~Please do drop a reply in my [[User_talk:DarkNight\|talk]] page if you feel its necessary.~~

	~~Thank you.~~

	~~[[User:DarkNight\|DarkNight]]~~

DarkNight at 03:01, 8 November 2019

2019-11-08T03:01:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:01, 8 November 2019
Line 50:		Line 50:
	Are those pages being worked on, going on an overhaul or going to be left blank until further notice?		Are those pages being worked on, going on an overhaul or going to be left blank until further notice?

	Do drop a reply in my [[User_talk:DarkNight\|talk]] page if you feel its ~~necesaary~~.		Please do drop a reply in my [[User_talk:DarkNight\|talk]] page if you feel its necessary.

			Thank you.

	[[User:DarkNight\|DarkNight]]		[[User:DarkNight\|DarkNight]]

DarkNight: Redirect Query from SMB315C.

2019-11-07T03:15:20Z

Redirect Query from SMB315C.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:15, 7 November 2019
Line 41:		Line 41:
	Thanks & Regards,<br>		Thanks & Regards,<br>
	--[[User:Apex-LW'21\|Apex-LW'21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW'21\|talk]]) 11:18, 8 April 2019 (+08)		--[[User:Apex-LW'21\|Apex-LW'21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW'21\|talk]]) 11:18, 8 April 2019 (+08)

			== Redirect: sgWiki Guidebook: Rules ==

			Hi.

			I've noticed that Chapter 2, 3, 6 and 7 are missing in the Rules section.

			Are those pages being worked on, going on an overhaul or going to be left blank until further notice?

			Do drop a reply in my [[User_talk:DarkNight\|talk]] page if you feel its necesaary.

			[[User:DarkNight\|DarkNight]]

Apex-LW'21 at 03:19, 8 April 2019

2019-04-08T03:19:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:19, 8 April 2019
Line 39:		Line 39:
	With regards to his recent edits, you may wish to clarify with user SBS3107H directly on his talk page.<br>		With regards to his recent edits, you may wish to clarify with user SBS3107H directly on his talk page.<br>

	Thanks & Regards,		Thanks & Regards,<br>
	--[[User:Apex-LW'21\|Apex-LW'21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW'21\|talk]]) 11:18, 8 April 2019 (+08)		--[[User:Apex-LW'21\|Apex-LW'21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW'21\|talk]]) 11:18, 8 April 2019 (+08)

Apex-LW'21: /* regarding moderator */

2019-04-08T03:18:27Z

regarding moderator

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:18, 8 April 2019
Line 32:		Line 32:
	thank you		thank you
	lemon1974 12/3/19		lemon1974 12/3/19

			==Reply==

			Apologies for the late reply.<br>

			With regards to his recent edits, you may wish to clarify with user SBS3107H directly on his talk page.<br>

			Thanks & Regards,
			--[[User:Apex-LW'21\|Apex-LW'21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW'21\|talk]]) 11:18, 8 April 2019 (+08)

Lemon1974: /* regarding moderator */

2019-03-12T05:26:47Z

regarding moderator

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:26, 12 March 2019
Line 29:		Line 29:
	and right now, he lock the B5LH page and revert some one else edit on new registration of B5LH? there are new B5LH registered and thus the info is correct, but he undo the edit and lock the page?		and right now, he lock the B5LH page and revert some one else edit on new registration of B5LH? there are new B5LH registered and thus the info is correct, but he undo the edit and lock the page?
	what is the reason of doing so? only he can edit to add in the new registration?		what is the reason of doing so? only he can edit to add in the new registration?

			thank you
			lemon1974 12/3/19

Lemon1974: /* regarding moderator */ new section

2019-03-12T05:26:24Z

regarding moderator: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:26, 12 March 2019
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Please write your message below this line. Thank you.<br>		Please write your message below this line. Thank you.<br>
	----		----

			== regarding moderator ==

			Hi

			is it possible to look into the action of the moderator SBS3107H?
			lot of wrong edits being done previously (such as editing all buses are under UPDEP when Ulu Pandan package start, assuming SG1848 is under UPDEP etc etc)?

			and right now, he lock the B5LH page and revert some one else edit on new registration of B5LH? there are new B5LH registered and thus the info is correct, but he undo the edit and lock the page?
			what is the reason of doing so? only he can edit to add in the new registration?

Apex-LW'21 at 12:14, 23 March 2018

2018-03-23T12:14:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 23 March 2018
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Please write your message below this line. Thank you.<br>		Please write your message below this line. Thank you.<br>
	----		----
	~~==Updates on Service 7A / 7B==~~
	~~Hey man,~~

	Yeaps, i do agree with your suggestion on marking the 7A & 7B perm buses with 7A/7* and 7B/7* instead. But i think this would be more for the BBDEP side? Because 7A is more messy than 7B it seems haha.

	~~And yeah, i guess it would help if you could include that line on the Service 7 page as well to clarify what's going on for the other users who refer to that page?~~

	~~Shall continue to observe the fleet size for 7A & 7B on the other hand.~~

	~~Cheers,~~
	~~SBS9631X~~

SBS9631X: /* Updates on Service 7A / 7B */

2018-02-28T04:33:19Z

Updates on Service 7A / 7B

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:33, 28 February 2018
Line 22:		Line 22:
	Hey man,		Hey man,

	~~Regarding Service 7~~, 7A & 7B ~~right, I~~ think ~~you should count those buses that do~~ the ~~full trips (ie~~. ~~eg, from Bedok to Clementi / Clementi to Bedok) as perm Sv 7~~		Yeaps, i do agree with your suggestion on marking the 7A & 7B perm buses with 7A/7* and 7B/7* instead. But i think this would be more for the BBDEP side? Because 7A is more messy than 7B it seems haha.

	~~Whereas for those buses~~ that ~~are~~ on ~~7A / 7B halfway till Dhoby area before changing to do a downroute / half-trip back as a "Sv~~ 7~~", they should be counted~~ as ~~perm Sv 7A / 7B only~~?		And yeah, i guess it would help if you could include that line on the Service 7 page as well to clarify what's going on for the other users who refer to that page?

	But i do think that it might be possible that the 7A / 7B fleet size isn't fixed? Because I think their main purpose of introducing 7A & 7B, is to counter the cases where Orchard Road jams up damn badly, or any other areas jams badly before Sv 7 hits Orchard (regardless of from Bedok or Clementi). In which case, the OCC might choose to cut the supposedly full-trip the Sv 7 BC is on, and ask him to only fulfil one half (which would be 7A / 7B) before u-turning back to the initial terminal to save the frequency? So i can't really give you an exact number yet for the duties it seems.. need to ~~KIV.~~		Shall continue to observe the fleet size for 7A & 7B on the other hand.

	~~But yeah, maybe it's better if we~~ observe ~~from like the sections where 7A / 7B operates before they loop back, which would eliminate any extra Sv 7 buses that pop-up due to the downroutes from doing Sv 7A / 7B earlier.~~

	As for the permers, Sv 7A definitely uses random buses for now (except for 5838E it seems). It's like a mix-and-mash of BN SP Wrights, buses from Sv 19 (i've no idea why they keep plucking the Sv 19 Wrights for example), and A95s from BNDEP (new & old) so far for Sv 7A.

	~~Whereas for Sv 7B, it's mostly the bulk of the new A95s that BBDEP received in the most recent batch.~~

	~~But in summary, I think we still need to KIV~~ the fleet size ~~and the developments~~ for Sv 7A & 7B. And given that I think that page is locked out as well, then maybe there's really no rush but observe first. Because as you know, BNDEP is fond of doing some rotational duties for no reason as well recently. So yeaps, just KIV first? But i hope my response does help clarify a little?

	Cheers,		Cheers,
	SBS9631X		SBS9631X