User talk:InquisitorViolator7533 - Revision history

InquisitorViolator7533: /* Autoblock request */ new section

2025-05-29T07:26:20Z

Autoblock request: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:26, 29 May 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Just add what you want on my talk page		Just add what you want on my talk page

			== Autoblock request ==

			Hi admin, can help to unblock the autoblock because I got autoblocked by another user. The ID is #32092

InquisitorViolator7533: Replaced content with "Just add what you want on my talk page"

2025-04-28T11:35:54Z

Replaced content with "Just add what you want on my talk page"

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:35, 28 April 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Just add what you want on my talk page		Just add what you want on my talk page

	~~==Users stance==~~
	~~===Why I prefer non-watermark images?===~~
	After all the days giving me relaxing feelings, I decided to remove LTG watermark images and request to replace with non-watermark images. That is because, you know things like affecting the infobox with no contact, can involve into Google search which confuse people someting like this:

	~~[[File:SgWiki LTG image popped up on search results.png\|center\|300px]]~~

	~~And I have noticed a user who was being warned because of this situation as you can see [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Shaun&diff=668249&oldid=661926 here].~~

	~~What about Facebook? Do Facebook use copyright? To get into this, we dont know either. Man this can lose my brain because of this~~

	~~Because of that, its recommended you read this first: https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/CA2021~~

	~~==Copyright==~~
	Dude why you blaming me for putting ltg photos, in fact I was skeptical about putting those photos. I put those photos in Q4 2024 for the creation of bus svc pages when other editors were putting ltg photos on the bus model pages. I didnt want to get scolded by the admin and other editors, I slowly then changed to non ltg pics in Dec 2024. In fact, did you know ltg photos can be used if not for commercial use and promotional advertising with credit given? Sgwiki is an educational resource platform (not commercial and advertising) meant for enthusiasts to learn more abt certain buses so LTG photos are acceptable. Finding non-watermarked pics are just even worse. Since ltg has a proper copyright notice whatsoever, non-watermarked pics that are posted on websites (e.g. Instagram, Flickr, etc) have their own copyright laws protecting their users from copyright especially the All Rights Reserved titles on their pics (unless otherwise stated like ltg). Do you want to get sued?? or do you have intentions to kill sgwiki like everybody else. Do check the upload log time stamps to show that i was transitioning.


	Bro, other people business how come become yours. If they want to talk to me abt ltg watermarked pics then they come talk to me not you. Anyways abt sgwiki getting sued is probably due to recent vandalism on the pages, a lot of people have been trying to gather alternatives like creating a new sgwiki or hack it and bring it down. Sueing is also possible to get sgwiki down and what to do after sgwiki goes down??

	~~== Regarding pictures ==~~

	~~I would like to make things crystal clear to you.~~

	First, I am already solving the issue of images here. I have completely no understanding of why this was brought up again to everyone and to me when I am busy! Bear this in mind, I am doing my best here creating complete pages and emphasised that replacing images come in last place!

	Secondly, user Sgbusntrain is a respected editor who has also invested his time creating a handful of Bus Service Pages. Please at least know that it is already not easy for him to put in the hard work and efforts in sgwiki. Please withdraw your remarks to Sgbusntrain given that he was already aware of the situation.

	Thirdly, with regards to your reply in the Buses talk page "You can a link added for crediting. But, we dont know either", are you sure that nothing will go wrong in Google Search while uploading a huge bunch of Flickr images?

	~~https://support.google.com/legal/answer/3463239?hl=en~~

	Please read the part on "What if I state that no copyright infringement is intended?". That is Google's official stance to your Flickr suggestions. I also doubt that you have even read the relevant Singapore legislations through the link given or even read though Flickr/LTG copyright notices.

	~~Thanks and Regards~~

	~~===Response===~~
	For the record, I used only 3 Flickr images for 3 bus service pages. These are properly sought with permissions, I go around outside of sgwiki asking around whether I can use these for sgwiki. When I finish the work on sgwiki, I show the completed work to the original photographers, asking them for feedback for improvements to the bus service pages. As for the rest of the 95%, I used my own images.

	The two Singapore Buses images that you uploaded are ok. But right now, all efforts should be put into making complete Bus Service pages and maintaining them first. The content is more important than the images, so please calm down. I will have more time to sort out the images for the wiki if users like you really put 100% concentration on the content.

	~~Thanks and Regards~~

	~~===Side note===~~
	~~If you really want to help in removing LTG images, you can compile a list of bus service pages that are using LTG images and list out the bus services to my talk page. I will sort that out.~~

	~~== Watermarked images ==~~

	~~Those were older photos I uploaded. Recent ones are all not watermarked~~

	~~== Service 251 ==~~

	Why did you blaming me for creating Bus Service 251. The information I start is correct. Is this how you want to blank Bus Service 251 page? Do check other pages I created which are correct information because I have the right to create with good information. Are you a serial suspect? I seek what you are doing. Dont be so funny

	~~RobloxXF~~

InquisitorViolator7533: /* This wiki is messed up */

2025-04-19T02:13:19Z

This wiki is messed up

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:13, 19 April 2025
Line 54:		Line 54:

	RobloxXF		RobloxXF

	~~== This wiki is messed up ==~~

	~~I dont know what happened but there are inappropriate stuff around the wiki~~

InquisitorViolator7533: /* This wiki is messed up */ new section

2025-04-04T11:14:32Z

This wiki is messed up: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:14, 4 April 2025
Line 54:		Line 54:

	RobloxXF		RobloxXF

			== This wiki is messed up ==

			I dont know what happened but there are inappropriate stuff around the wiki

RobloxXF: /* Service 251 */ new section

2025-03-31T17:22:57Z

Service 251: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:22, 1 April 2025
Line 48:		Line 48:

	Those were older photos I uploaded. Recent ones are all not watermarked		Those were older photos I uploaded. Recent ones are all not watermarked

			== Service 251 ==

			Why did you blaming me for creating Bus Service 251. The information I start is correct. Is this how you want to blank Bus Service 251 page? Do check other pages I created which are correct information because I have the right to create with good information. Are you a serial suspect? I seek what you are doing. Dont be so funny

			RobloxXF

Kay: /* Watermarked images */ new section

2025-03-22T13:07:36Z

Watermarked images: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:07, 22 March 2025
Line 44:		Line 44:
	===Side note===		===Side note===
	If you really want to help in removing LTG images, you can compile a list of bus service pages that are using LTG images and list out the bus services to my talk page. I will sort that out.		If you really want to help in removing LTG images, you can compile a list of bus service pages that are using LTG images and list out the bus services to my talk page. I will sort that out.

			== Watermarked images ==

			Those were older photos I uploaded. Recent ones are all not watermarked

Wekelwrady: /* Response */

2025-03-21T16:09:33Z

Response

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:09, 22 March 2025
Line 38:		Line 38:
	For the record, I used only 3 Flickr images for 3 bus service pages. These are properly sought with permissions, I go around outside of sgwiki asking around whether I can use these for sgwiki. When I finish the work on sgwiki, I show the completed work to the original photographers, asking them for feedback for improvements to the bus service pages. As for the rest of the 95%, I used my own images.		For the record, I used only 3 Flickr images for 3 bus service pages. These are properly sought with permissions, I go around outside of sgwiki asking around whether I can use these for sgwiki. When I finish the work on sgwiki, I show the completed work to the original photographers, asking them for feedback for improvements to the bus service pages. As for the rest of the 95%, I used my own images.

	The two Singapore Buses images that you uploaded are ok. But right now, all efforts should be put into making complete Bus Service pages and maintaining them first. The content is more important than the images, so please calm down. I will have more time to ~~sought~~ out the images for the wiki if users like you really put 100% concentration on the content.		The two Singapore Buses images that you uploaded are ok. But right now, all efforts should be put into making complete Bus Service pages and maintaining them first. The content is more important than the images, so please calm down. I will have more time to sort out the images for the wiki if users like you really put 100% concentration on the content.

	Thanks and Regards		Thanks and Regards

			===Side note===
			If you really want to help in removing LTG images, you can compile a list of bus service pages that are using LTG images and list out the bus services to my talk page. I will sort that out.

Wekelwrady: /* Regarding pictures */

2025-03-21T15:58:45Z

Regarding pictures

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:58, 21 March 2025
Line 32:		Line 32:

	Please read the part on "What if I state that no copyright infringement is intended?". That is Google's official stance to your Flickr suggestions. I also doubt that you have even read the relevant Singapore legislations through the link given or even read though Flickr/LTG copyright notices.		Please read the part on "What if I state that no copyright infringement is intended?". That is Google's official stance to your Flickr suggestions. I also doubt that you have even read the relevant Singapore legislations through the link given or even read though Flickr/LTG copyright notices.

			Thanks and Regards

			===Response===
			For the record, I used only 3 Flickr images for 3 bus service pages. These are properly sought with permissions, I go around outside of sgwiki asking around whether I can use these for sgwiki. When I finish the work on sgwiki, I show the completed work to the original photographers, asking them for feedback for improvements to the bus service pages. As for the rest of the 95%, I used my own images.

			The two Singapore Buses images that you uploaded are ok. But right now, all efforts should be put into making complete Bus Service pages and maintaining them first. The content is more important than the images, so please calm down. I will have more time to sought out the images for the wiki if users like you really put 100% concentration on the content.

	Thanks and Regards		Thanks and Regards

InquisitorViolator7533 at 15:50, 21 March 2025

2025-03-21T15:50:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:50, 21 March 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Just add what you want on my talk page		Just add what you want on my talk page

			==Users stance==
			===Why I prefer non-watermark images?===
			After all the days giving me relaxing feelings, I decided to remove LTG watermark images and request to replace with non-watermark images. That is because, you know things like affecting the infobox with no contact, can involve into Google search which confuse people someting like this:

			[[File:SgWiki LTG image popped up on search results.png\|center\|300px]]

			And I have noticed a user who was being warned because of this situation as you can see [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Shaun&diff=668249&oldid=661926 here].

			What about Facebook? Do Facebook use copyright? To get into this, we dont know either. Man this can lose my brain because of this

			Because of that, its recommended you read this first: https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/CA2021

	==Copyright==		==Copyright==

Wekelwrady: /* Regarding pictures */

2025-03-21T15:35:37Z

Regarding pictures

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:35, 21 March 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:
	First, I am already solving the issue of images here. I have completely no understanding of why this was brought up again to everyone and to me when I am busy! Bear this in mind, I am doing my best here creating complete pages and emphasised that replacing images come in last place!		First, I am already solving the issue of images here. I have completely no understanding of why this was brought up again to everyone and to me when I am busy! Bear this in mind, I am doing my best here creating complete pages and emphasised that replacing images come in last place!

	Secondly, user Sgbusntrain is a respected editor who has also invested his time creating a handful of Bus Service Pages. Please at least know that it is already not easy for him to put in the hard work and efforts in sgwiki.		Secondly, user Sgbusntrain is a respected editor who has also invested his time creating a handful of Bus Service Pages. Please at least know that it is already not easy for him to put in the hard work and efforts in sgwiki. Please withdraw your remarks to Sgbusntrain given that he was already aware of the situation.

	Thirdly, with regards to your reply in the Buses talk page "You can a link added for crediting. But, we dont know either", are you sure that nothing will go wrong in Google Search while uploading a huge bunch of Flickr images?		Thirdly, with regards to your reply in the Buses talk page "You can a link added for crediting. But, we dont know either", are you sure that nothing will go wrong in Google Search while uploading a huge bunch of Flickr images?