User talk:LTA Bus irrationalisation - Revision history

SMB315C at 12:16, 5 October 2025

2025-10-05T12:16:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:16, 5 October 2025
Line 80:		Line 80:

	Regards		Regards

			==Gali Batu conflict==
			Hi.

			Although the Gali Batu bus terminal is not yet open for public use, it is currently used as a bus terminus for s75 & s184. It will be inaccurate to classify it as a "bus depot" when it is clearly designed as a bus terminal despite being situated above an existing train depot and beside the newly opened bus depot.

			Thanks.

SBS5250M at 13:33, 24 September 2025

2025-09-24T13:33:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:33, 24 September 2025
Line 75:		Line 75:

	[[User:Alphabetlorefan1\|Alphabetlorefan1]] ([[User talk:Alphabetlorefan1\|talk]]) 5 July 2025, 12:21		[[User:Alphabetlorefan1\|Alphabetlorefan1]] ([[User talk:Alphabetlorefan1\|talk]]) 5 July 2025, 12:21

			==Thanks==
			Thank. That is better unlike SBS5251K who anyhow edit and request to ban. I think he is Supernutorcrazy.

			Regards

Alphabetlorefan1: /* Re: TTS Deployments */

2025-07-05T04:24:08Z

Re: TTS Deployments

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:24, 5 July 2025
Line 64:		Line 64:
	Hi, thanks for sharing your feedback on my talk page. With potential concerns regarding the TTS deployments you edit last year that I had to revert back because you wrote it right. Your edit proves to have all 3 buses perm 143 despite being adless. I would like to point several edits you made. First up, you said SBS3380J perm 143 on that day https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Volvo_B9TL_(Wright_Eclipse_Gemini_2)_(Batch_3)&diff=prev&oldid=606533 I would like to point that out it's still FD unless bus recieved ad unlike other TTS BUDEP buses.		Hi, thanks for sharing your feedback on my talk page. With potential concerns regarding the TTS deployments you edit last year that I had to revert back because you wrote it right. Your edit proves to have all 3 buses perm 143 despite being adless. I would like to point several edits you made. First up, you said SBS3380J perm 143 on that day https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Volvo_B9TL_(Wright_Eclipse_Gemini_2)_(Batch_3)&diff=prev&oldid=606533 I would like to point that out it's still FD unless bus recieved ad unlike other TTS BUDEP buses.

	Secondly, [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Volvo_B9TL_(Wright_Eclipse_Gemini_2)_(Batch_3)&diff=prev&oldid=611302 SBS3406U] and [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Volvo_B9TL_(Wright_Eclipse_Gemini_2)_(Batch_3)&diff=prev&oldid=610791 SBS3422Y], your edit might be a false deployment due to bus being adless. As I know by other spotters that SBS3422Y had been running around last year, a potential outcome from my eye that I also spotted SBS3422Y running around as FD between March and May 2024 which is why it never became a 143 perm.		Secondly, [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Volvo_B9TL_(Wright_Eclipse_Gemini_2)_(Batch_3)&diff=prev&oldid=611302 SBS3406U] and [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Volvo_B9TL_(Wright_Eclipse_Gemini_2)_(Batch_3)&diff=prev&oldid=610791 SBS3422Y], your edit might be a false deployment due to bus being adless. As I know by other spotters that SBS3422Y had been running around last year, a potential outcome from my eye that I also spotted SBS3422Y running around as FD between March and May 2024 which is why [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Volvo_B9TL_(Wright_Eclipse_Gemini_2)_(Batch_3)&diff=prev&oldid=612053 it never became a 143 perm].

	For info on what you wrote and said to me that you are editing deployments and asking me regarding TTS deployment will be the case, I'd rather you leave it as FD first until it had gotten an ad.		For info on what you wrote and said to me that you are editing deployments and asking me regarding TTS deployment will be the case, I'd rather you leave it as FD first until it had gotten an ad.

Alphabetlorefan1: /* Re: TTS Deployments */ new section

2025-07-05T04:21:55Z

Re: TTS Deployments: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:21, 5 July 2025
Line 59:		Line 59:

	[[User:Shaun\|Shaun]] ([[User talk:Shaun\|talk]]) 25 February 2025, 21:45		[[User:Shaun\|Shaun]] ([[User talk:Shaun\|talk]]) 25 February 2025, 21:45

			== Re: TTS Deployments ==

			Hi, thanks for sharing your feedback on my talk page. With potential concerns regarding the TTS deployments you edit last year that I had to revert back because you wrote it right. Your edit proves to have all 3 buses perm 143 despite being adless. I would like to point several edits you made. First up, you said SBS3380J perm 143 on that day https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Volvo_B9TL_(Wright_Eclipse_Gemini_2)_(Batch_3)&diff=prev&oldid=606533 I would like to point that out it's still FD unless bus recieved ad unlike other TTS BUDEP buses.

			Secondly, [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Volvo_B9TL_(Wright_Eclipse_Gemini_2)_(Batch_3)&diff=prev&oldid=611302 SBS3406U] and [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Volvo_B9TL_(Wright_Eclipse_Gemini_2)_(Batch_3)&diff=prev&oldid=610791 SBS3422Y], your edit might be a false deployment due to bus being adless. As I know by other spotters that SBS3422Y had been running around last year, a potential outcome from my eye that I also spotted SBS3422Y running around as FD between March and May 2024 which is why it never became a 143 perm.

			For info on what you wrote and said to me that you are editing deployments and asking me regarding TTS deployment will be the case, I'd rather you leave it as FD first until it had gotten an ad.

			Which is why [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Volvo_B9TL_(Wright_Eclipse_Gemini_2)_(Batch_3)&diff=prev&oldid=612234 I saw SBS3425P running on 106 for 3 weeks] since [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Volvo_B9TL_(Wright_Eclipse_Gemini_2)_(Batch_3)&diff=prev&oldid=608742 it got the Visit Korea ad.]

			Any questions or reply feel free to drop by my talk page

			Thanks

			[[User:Alphabetlorefan1\|Alphabetlorefan1]] ([[User talk:Alphabetlorefan1\|talk]]) 5 July 2025, 12:21

Shaun: /* What does "Shift away from watermarked images" mean? */

2025-02-25T13:45:13Z

What does "Shift away from watermarked images" mean?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 25 February 2025
Line 58:		Line 58:
	Thanks		Thanks

	[[User:~~Alphabetlorefan1~~\|~~Alphabetlorefan1~~]] ([[User talk:~~Alphabetlorefan1~~\|talk]]) 25 February 2025, 21:44		[[User:Shaun\|Shaun]] ([[User talk:Shaun\|talk]]) 25 February 2025, 21:45

Shaun: /* What does "Shift away from watermarked images" mean? */

2025-02-25T13:44:41Z

What does "Shift away from watermarked images" mean?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:44, 25 February 2025
Line 54:		Line 54:
	== What does "Shift away from watermarked images" mean? ==		== What does "Shift away from watermarked images" mean? ==

	I saw what you asked Shaun what it means on the Volvo B5LH page. To get to that, the phrase means all watermarked images have to be replaced. However, we are still in the making of non-watermark images, so if you are creating any pages, be sure to find any of the non-watermark images. If you cannot find, leave it blank then I will find it		I saw what you asked Shaun what it means on the Volvo B5LH & BYD BC12A04 page. To get to that, the phrase means all watermarked images have to be replaced. However, we are still in the making of non-watermark images, so if you are creating any pages, be sure to find any of the non-watermark images. If you cannot find, leave it blank then I will find it

	Thanks		Thanks

	[[User:Alphabetlorefan1\|Alphabetlorefan1]] ([[User talk:Alphabetlorefan1\|talk]]) 25 February 2025, 17:12		[[User:Alphabetlorefan1\|Alphabetlorefan1]] ([[User talk:Alphabetlorefan1\|talk]]) 25 February 2025, 21:44

Alphabetlorefan1: /* What does "Shift away from watermarked images" mean? */ new section

2025-02-25T09:12:38Z

What does "Shift away from watermarked images" mean?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 25 February 2025
Line 51:		Line 51:

	Thanks & Regards		Thanks & Regards

			== What does "Shift away from watermarked images" mean? ==

			I saw what you asked Shaun what it means on the Volvo B5LH page. To get to that, the phrase means all watermarked images have to be replaced. However, we are still in the making of non-watermark images, so if you are creating any pages, be sure to find any of the non-watermark images. If you cannot find, leave it blank then I will find it

			Thanks

			[[User:Alphabetlorefan1\|Alphabetlorefan1]] ([[User talk:Alphabetlorefan1\|talk]]) 25 February 2025, 17:12

Supernutorcrazy at 02:07, 6 December 2024

2024-12-06T02:07:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:07, 6 December 2024
Line 44:		Line 44:

	I undo my previous edit cause I had no time to further investigate the first MSP train for Yishun (which is a must) and also the first train (MRB) downroute after Yishun. That's why I put for simplicity sake just put MSP given that we all know is MRB bound only.		I undo my previous edit cause I had no time to further investigate the first MSP train for Yishun (which is a must) and also the first train (MRB) downroute after Yishun. That's why I put for simplicity sake just put MSP given that we all know is MRB bound only.

			== Clickable Link (Bus Service) ==
			Hi,

			I had noticed that you had commented about clickable link which is hidden especially with the new layout (where there is no form of identification). Refer to the new format, I had included a dotted underline for clickable link to Bus service pages, and will do so for the MRT stations. Would this be better?

			Thanks & Regards

Supernutorcrazy: /* Re: Bus service pages */

2024-11-04T08:33:56Z

Re: Bus service pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:33, 4 November 2024
Line 39:		Line 39:

	Thanks.		Thanks.

			==First / Last Train ==
			Hi,

			I undo my previous edit cause I had no time to further investigate the first MSP train for Yishun (which is a must) and also the first train (MRB) downroute after Yishun. That's why I put for simplicity sake just put MSP given that we all know is MRB bound only.

Supernutorcrazy at 08:11, 3 November 2024

2024-11-03T08:11:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 3 November 2024
Line 26:		Line 26:

	RE: Noted, thanks for clarifying.		RE: Noted, thanks for clarifying.

			==Re: Bus service pages==
			Hi,

			Thank you for feedback. From the original upgrading, it was observed that the reformat change is highly duplicative from Land Transport Guru, and the other apps display. This was finetuned to include first/last bus timing for key bus stop nodes such as downroute trips, terminating stops, stops near landmarks such as MRT/LRT which will enable commuters to easily reference to as compared with businterchange.net where it was much easier to reference to (rather than remember the bus stop code or bus stop name) and search up the timings, which was not found in Land Transport Guru.

			Secondly, wiki is not a gallery and therefore, rest assured that the reformatted page will not filled with many photos of the bus service, with only key photos to showcase or highlight the key importance.

			Regarding the other information that makes it stands out, I had even informed sgbustrain about it which can be included if there are detailed information, such as duty table and the fleet type/rego being deployed. For my observation, even Tower Transit Flexi Deployment do have a certain pattern - such as type of fleet model being deployed on the duty slot. At times I even observed that the fleet may also followed SBS Transit and SMRT Buses to like "perm" in a group of services.

			However, such information are highly missing in sgWiki and thats where editors like you can help to filled up it and include it into the new format page. Please feel free to experiment the layout to include such information (like duty table/slot information) in.

			Thanks.