User talk:SBS3004X - Revision history

Themystery: /* Services 74 and 147/A */

2020-07-01T00:15:06Z

Services 74 and 147/A

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:15, 1 July 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~== Services 74 and 147/A ==~~

	~~Hi SBS3004X,~~

	~~Thnank you for that information. If you would like, here is the information for Short-Trip 147A from my last observation:~~

	* First Bus - SBS3000G [BBDEP]
	* Second Bus - SBS3851S (not confirmed for perm) [BBDEP]
	* Third Bus - SG5325T [HGDEP]
	* Fourth Bus - SBS7321D (not confirmed for perm) [HGDEP]
	* Fifth Bus - SBS3883A [BBDEP]
	* Sixth Bus - SG5327M [BBDEP]
	* Seventh Bus - SG5325T [HGDEP]
	* Last Bus - SBS7392Z [HGDEP]

	~~These were as per what I last observed. Other than SBS3000G and SG5325T, I have not really checked on the other buses, in particular SBS7392Z which I have not observed in quite a while.~~

	~~So far I have seen SBS5229B on 116A in the earlier days and SBS8433H on 116A 2 months ago. I have not noticed 116A since.~~

	~~Hope it helps.~~

	~~Themystery~~

	== Re: Service 165 ==		== Re: Service 165 ==

Themystery: /* Re: SBS8695T & Service 165 */

2020-07-01T00:14:35Z

Re: SBS8695T & Service 165

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:14, 1 July 2020
Line 22:		Line 22:
	Themystery		Themystery

	== Re: ~~SBS8695T &~~ Service 165 ==		== Re: Service 165 ==

	Hi SBS3004X,		Hi SBS3004X,

	~~I do not think that SBS8695T went~~ to ~~BBDEP at all~~.		Due to COVID-19, which has weakened demand on bus services, SBS Transit had taken the measure to reduce the number of buses plying Service 165 to optimise resources. However, with the slow transition out of the Circuit Breaker, SBS Transit has been gradually been reinstating the previous schedules back to pre COVID-19 standards. In fact, Service 165's schedule and duties were reverted back to the normal weekday schedules since 29 June, Monday. I will be updating the duties back to normal either later today or tomorrow.

	I ~~think maybe SBS7679Y could~~ be ~~just replacing a HGDEP bus temporarily in this instance. But you have to really see its duty sheet~~ to ~~better understand~~.

	Hope that helps. Thank you for your concern.		Hope that helps. Thank you for your concern.

	Themystery		Themystery

SBS3004X at 03:06, 22 June 2020

2020-06-22T03:06:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:06, 22 June 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~==Service 165==~~

	Just to clarify, 8159A indeed has been on HG 165 for the past few weeks. But every day, it's not on an assigned fixed perm slot (ie. every other day, it's replacing some other MIA Sv 165 perm, even if the timings don't change, because they shuffle around the perms)

	~~And 8159A DOES NOT have any assigned slot for HG 165 since Sch Hols ended.~~

	~~On the other hand, 5225L has a perm slot assigned (sw-411 15A/22P) based on the internal system since Sch Hols ended, which is incidentally, 8159A's previous perm slot.~~

	~~But looking forward, the fleet should stabilise only from end-Jul onwards.~~

	~~Since you reverted my edits for the Sv 165 page, I suggest you KIV both 5225L & 8159A's actual duty number & timings for each day you spot them on 165 / away from 165.~~

	~~Especially for 8159A, because its appearance for Sv 165 doesn't always 100% seem to tally with its perm status.~~

	~~And then update accordingly / let me know, thanks.~~

	~~==Note about Deregistration of Buses==~~
	1. Its technically to be removed and saved at struck midnight / the following day .... [[User:(SBS3107H)\|<b><font color="red" size="3px">SBS</font><font color="purple" size="2px">3107H</font></b>]] ([[User talk:SBS3107H\|<font face="Comic Sans MS"><font color="orange" size="2px">talk</font></font>]]) 23:40, 9 May 2014 (SGT)

	2. This is your second note. It has to altered at the proper timing with accordance to OneMotoring database. And refer to above sentence. [[User:(SBS3107H)\|<b><font color="red" size="3px">SBS</font><font color="purple" size="2px">3107H</font></b>]] ([[User talk:SBS3107H\|<font face="Comic Sans MS"><font color="orange" size="2px">talk</font></font>]]) 22:55, 11 May 2014 (SGT)

	~~==Note==~~
	What's with the integration and keep the rest separated on Service columns on [[Scania K230UB (Batch 1 Euro V)]]? Discuss with the users including admins and me before making any major changes ... [[User:(SBS3107H)\|<b><font color="red" size="3px">SBS</font><font color="purple" size="2px">3107H</font></b>]] ([[User talk:SBS3107H\|<font face="Comic Sans MS"><font color="orange" size="2px">talk</font></font>]]) 17:29, 2 June 2014 (SGT)

	~~==Unnecessary Merging of Deployment List==~~
	~~Please refrain from merging the deployment list unnecessarily like what you have did on the following pages:<br>~~
	~~Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (BSEP Batch 1) to Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2B)‎ and<br>~~
	~~Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (BSEP Batch 2) to Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 3)‎<br>~~

	~~The reason is because these Wright buses are classified to differentiate for the BSEP and the production batch purchases.<br>~~

	~~Thank you.<br>~~

	~~--[[User:Apex-LW'21\|Apex-LW'21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW'21\|talk]]) 19:10, 5 June 2014 (SGT)~~

	~~== SMB5002Y ==~~

	Hi there. I think you should not have created another page for SMRT ADL E500 MMC, like [[Alexander Dennis Enviro 500 MMC]]. There's already both [[Alexander Dennis Enviro500]] and [[Alexander Dennis Enviro500 (BSEP)]] pages existed in sgWiki, whereby the admins can only edit that particular page.<br>
	~~[[User:SMB1341U\|SMB1341U]] ([[User talk:SMB1341U\|talk]]) 12:30, 03/06/2014 (SGT)~~

	~~Please refrain from creating duplicate pages as there is a page existed in sgWiki.<br>~~
	~~You can refer to the existing page here. [[Alexander Dennis Enviro500]].<br>~~

	~~Thanks.<br>~~

	~~--[[User:Apex-LW'21\|Apex-LW'21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW'21\|talk]]) 19:45, 19 June 2014 (SGT)~~

	~~== Note About Editing Deployments ==~~

	~~Please do not fit in deployments that you are not even sure of. How could 3400K be deployed to Svc 69 if there is no notice of a BSEP fleet add?~~

	== Services 74 and 147/A ==		== Services 74 and 147/A ==

Themystery: /* SBS8695T */

2020-06-03T00:39:28Z

SBS8695T

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:39, 3 June 2020
Line 73:		Line 73:
	Themystery		Themystery

	== SBS8695T ==		== Re: SBS8695T & Service 165 ==

	Hi SBS3004X,		Hi SBS3004X,

	I ~~understand~~ that ~~you have monitored that you have seen~~ SBS8695T ~~under~~ BBDEP ~~control. However, I would like to reassure you that this bus is still under HGDEP control as per SBST database~~.		I do not think that SBS8695T went to BBDEP at all.

	~~Furthermore, since Service 165 is under the Sengkang-Hougang Bus Package, it does not really make much sense if~~ a ~~Service 165 bus transfers out from~~ HGDEP ~~to BBDEP as it contradicts the point since it is a depot not mainly in charge of the~~ bus ~~package. It would only make sense~~ in this ~~case when a BBDEP Service 165 bus transfers~~ to ~~HGDEP control~~.		I think maybe SBS7679Y could be just replacing a HGDEP bus temporarily in this instance. But you have to really see its duty sheet to better understand.

	Hope that helps. Thank you for your concern.		Hope that helps. Thank you for your concern.

	Themystery		Themystery

Themystery: /* SBS8695T */ new section

2020-05-26T00:40:30Z

SBS8695T: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:40, 26 May 2020
Line 70:		Line 70:

	Hope it helps.		Hope it helps.

			Themystery

			== SBS8695T ==

			Hi SBS3004X,

			I understand that you have monitored that you have seen SBS8695T under BBDEP control. However, I would like to reassure you that this bus is still under HGDEP control as per SBST database.

			Furthermore, since Service 165 is under the Sengkang-Hougang Bus Package, it does not really make much sense if a Service 165 bus transfers out from HGDEP to BBDEP as it contradicts the point since it is a depot not mainly in charge of the bus package. It would only make sense in this case when a BBDEP Service 165 bus transfers to HGDEP control.

			Hope that helps. Thank you for your concern.

	Themystery		Themystery

Supernutorcrazy: Removal of Warning Point

2020-02-15T14:27:08Z

Removal of Warning Point

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:27, 15 February 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{Warning Point\|17 November 2019\|Harassment of other people talk page for your own observation.}}~~

	==Service 165==		==Service 165==

Supernutorcrazy at 03:18, 17 November 2019

2019-11-17T03:18:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:18, 17 November 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Warning Point\|17 November 2019\|Harassment of other people talk page for your own observation.}}

	==Service 165==		==Service 165==

Themystery: /* Services 74 and 147/A */

2019-11-14T00:06:19Z

Services 74 and 147/A

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:06, 14 November 2019
Line 67:		Line 67:
	These were as per what I last observed. Other than SBS3000G and SG5325T, I have not really checked on the other buses, in particular SBS7392Z which I have not observed in quite a while.		These were as per what I last observed. Other than SBS3000G and SG5325T, I have not really checked on the other buses, in particular SBS7392Z which I have not observed in quite a while.

	~~The SG584** series of A95s normally do perform QoS trips~~ on ~~Weekdays at around 12pm from Clementi. However, QoS trips should not be considered as crossover trips~~. ~~Thanks for your concern though. Also,~~ I have ~~seen SBS3674L going Off Service from Buona Vista at around 12pm today. Not sure if it is split shift~~.		So far I have seen SBS5229B on 116A in the earlier days and SBS8433H on 116A 2 months ago. I have not noticed 116A since.

	Hope it helps.		Hope it helps.

	Themystery		Themystery

Themystery: /* Services 74 and 147/A */

2019-11-13T12:28:38Z

Services 74 and 147/A

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:28, 13 November 2019
Line 67:		Line 67:
	These were as per what I last observed. Other than SBS3000G and SG5325T, I have not really checked on the other buses, in particular SBS7392Z which I have not observed in quite a while.		These were as per what I last observed. Other than SBS3000G and SG5325T, I have not really checked on the other buses, in particular SBS7392Z which I have not observed in quite a while.

	Thanks for ~~the info about Service 147 and SBS5219E~~. ~~But~~ I ~~do not actually know much about SBS5219E though~~. ~~I still think SBS5229B~~ is ~~doing 116A~~.		The SG584** series of A95s normally do perform QoS trips on Weekdays at around 12pm from Clementi. However, QoS trips should not be considered as crossover trips. Thanks for your concern though. Also, I have seen SBS3674L going Off Service from Buona Vista at around 12pm today. Not sure if it is split shift.

	Hope it helps.		Hope it helps.

	Themystery		Themystery

Themystery: /* Services 74 and 147/A */

2019-11-12T07:51:54Z

Services 74 and 147/A

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 12 November 2019
Line 66:		Line 66:

	These were as per what I last observed. Other than SBS3000G and SG5325T, I have not really checked on the other buses, in particular SBS7392Z which I have not observed in quite a while.		These were as per what I last observed. Other than SBS3000G and SG5325T, I have not really checked on the other buses, in particular SBS7392Z which I have not observed in quite a while.

			Thanks for the info about Service 147 and SBS5219E. But I do not actually know much about SBS5219E though. I still think SBS5229B is doing 116A.

	Hope it helps.		Hope it helps.

	Themystery		Themystery