User talk:SBS3602U - Revision history

Supernutorcrazy: Reverted edits by TIT1234T (talk) to last revision by SBS3602U

2017-07-11T02:05:40Z

Reverted edits by TIT1234T (talk) to last revision by SBS3602U

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:05, 11 July 2017
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\|\|'''[//sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS3602U&action=edit&section=new + Create a new topic]'''		\|\|'''[//sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS3602U&action=edit&section=new + Create a new topic]'''
	\|}		\|}

	~~== Enquiry ==~~

	~~[https://www.finansialku.com/5-contoh-soal-psikotes-dan-kiat-sukses-hadapi-tes-psikotes-saat-melamar-kerja/ Enquirë psikotes]~~

	~~20170710~~

TIT1234T: /* Enquiry */ new section

2017-07-10T15:42:59Z

Enquiry: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:42, 10 July 2017
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\|\|'''[//sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS3602U&action=edit&section=new + Create a new topic]'''		\|\|'''[//sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS3602U&action=edit&section=new + Create a new topic]'''
	\|}		\|}

			== Enquiry ==

			[https://www.finansialku.com/5-contoh-soal-psikotes-dan-kiat-sukses-hadapi-tes-psikotes-saat-melamar-kerja/ Enquirë psikotes]

			20170710

SBS3602U: Such a "coincidence" both edits are one minute apart huh? That's not the first time it has happened.

2017-06-25T12:12:31Z

Such a "coincidence" both edits are one minute apart huh? That's not the first time it has happened.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:12, 25 June 2017
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\|\|'''[//sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS3602U&action=edit&section=new + Create a new topic]'''		\|\|'''[//sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS3602U&action=edit&section=new + Create a new topic]'''
	\|}		\|}

	~~== Changing of Bus Image ==~~

	~~Hi,~~

	I would like to highlight to you, as I had done to user Apex-LW'21, that the images posted by the new users does not required image attribution etc. if they are taken by themselves and upload, in acknowledge that sgWiki had CC (Creative Common - Fair Use). However, with the images we used to upload in the past belongs to other community groups, if they had contact us for usage of their image, we, as an administrator, are obliged to delete the images as describe by them due to copyright reasons.

	I hope that this clear the misconception of images need to have "image attribution". But of course, proper naming of images is required as per normal and proper credits should be given if using of other users images.

	~~Regards~~

	~~{{AdminMsg\|Supernutorcrazy\|19 Mar 2017\|1921}}~~

	~~== TIB1021R & TIB1022M is only a 302 temporary perm replacing 1237K & 1238H ==~~

	~~Hi SBS3602U,~~

	I disagree with TIB1152X 190 edit and that's why I edit the page. I am SG5064X the forum user and people in the Forum say that 1021R & 1022M is only temporary replacing 1237K & 1238H and 1237 & 1238 came back and 1021 & 1022 is MIA after that. In BCM, 1 service will only have some perm bus and the rest are random fleets.
	~~User TIB1152X 190 holds multiple accounts. I only hold SG5064X and thanks.~~

SG5064X: /* TIB1021R & TIB1022M is only a 302 temporary perm replacing 1237K & 1238H */ new section

2017-06-25T09:48:40Z

TIB1021R & TIB1022M is only a 302 temporary perm replacing 1237K & 1238H: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:48, 25 June 2017
Line 19:		Line 19:

	{{AdminMsg\|Supernutorcrazy\|19 Mar 2017\|1921}}		{{AdminMsg\|Supernutorcrazy\|19 Mar 2017\|1921}}

			== TIB1021R & TIB1022M is only a 302 temporary perm replacing 1237K & 1238H ==

			Hi SBS3602U,

			I disagree with TIB1152X 190 edit and that's why I edit the page. I am SG5064X the forum user and people in the Forum say that 1021R & 1022M is only temporary replacing 1237K & 1238H and 1237 & 1238 came back and 1021 & 1022 is MIA after that. In BCM, 1 service will only have some perm bus and the rest are random fleets.
			User TIB1152X 190 holds multiple accounts. I only hold SG5064X and thanks.

ASA1234 at 02:40, 12 April 2017

2017-04-12T02:40:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:40, 12 April 2017
Line 19:		Line 19:

	{{AdminMsg\|Supernutorcrazy\|19 Mar 2017\|1921}}		{{AdminMsg\|Supernutorcrazy\|19 Mar 2017\|1921}}

	~~== Seeking clarification as to SMB5046X actual status. ==~~

	I am filing this application seeking a clarification with regards to the legitimate/appropriate status to be listed for SMB5046X in both the [[Alexander Dennis Enviro500]] and [[SMRT Non-Revenue Buses]] pages. Recently, it has been reported by several bus enthusiasts in Facebook that SMB5046X had been repaired and back on service with the following differences as reflected on the former page:

	~~a) The red SMRT logos are now gapless.~~
	~~b) The bus is back with a new 'IMOB' advertisement.~~
	~~c) The bus is now from AMDEP, and is currently listed as AMDEP SP in the Enviro 500 page.~~

	However, official checks revealed that SMB5046X is still under official lay up till 11 August 2017 as reflected in the One Motoring website. While the bus deployment pages may not have been congruous with the non-revenue buses (e.g. some of the buses as unknown statuses in the latter do not have a 'N/A' status in the former in the case of those not officially laid up), some of those bus enthusiasts failed to realise that SMB5046X had actually been officially laid up previously and is, as of now, still officially laid up.

	I have checked on past similar cases and the closest one is about 3 Wrights and 4 Citaros being reflected as laid up in OM from the period between 19 August 2011 and 23 February 2012, while in fact during this period, they have been spotted doing BNDEP services and there was no lay up status reflected in their deployment pages. Similarly, SMB5046X cannot be said to be a non-revenue bus (since it had been reported to have been on service recently), but since the system of reflecting deployments have been reviewed and is therefore different from that of 2011, I would therefore refer this matter for your advice as well as that of the administrators.

	~~Cheers.~~

	~~--[[User:ASA1234\|ASA1234]] ([[User talk:ASA1234\|talk]]) 01:30, 7 April 2017 (+08)~~

ASA1234: /* Seeking clarification as to SMB5046X actual status. */

2017-04-06T17:30:27Z

Seeking clarification as to SMB5046X actual status.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:30, 7 April 2017
Line 26:		Line 26:
	a) The red SMRT logos are now gapless.		a) The red SMRT logos are now gapless.
	b) The bus is back with a new 'IMOB' advertisement.		b) The bus is back with a new 'IMOB' advertisement.
	c) The bus is now from AMDEP, and is currently listed as AMDEP SP in the Enviro 500 ~~age~~.		c) The bus is now from AMDEP, and is currently listed as AMDEP SP in the Enviro 500 page.

	However, official checks revealed that SMB5046X is still under official lay up till 11 August 2017 as reflected in the One Motoring website. While the bus deployment pages may not have been congruous with the non-revenue buses (e.g. some of the buses as unknown statuses in the latter do not have a 'N/A' status in the former in the case of those not officially laid up), some of those bus enthusiasts failed to realise that SMB5046X had actually been officially laid up previously and is, as of now, still officially laid up.		However, official checks revealed that SMB5046X is still under official lay up till 11 August 2017 as reflected in the One Motoring website. While the bus deployment pages may not have been congruous with the non-revenue buses (e.g. some of the buses as unknown statuses in the latter do not have a 'N/A' status in the former in the case of those not officially laid up), some of those bus enthusiasts failed to realise that SMB5046X had actually been officially laid up previously and is, as of now, still officially laid up.

	I have checked on past similar cases and the closest one is about to 3 Wrights and 4 Citaros being reflected as laid up from the period between 19 August 2011 and 23 February 2012, while in fact during this period ~~when reflected as laid up~~, they have been spotted doing BNDEP services and there was no lay up status reflected in their deployment pages. Similarly, SMB5046X cannot be said to be a non-revenue bus (since it had been reported to have been on service recently), but since the system of reflecting deployments have been reviewed and is therefore different from that of 2011, I would therefore refer this matter for your advice as well as that of the administrators.		I have checked on past similar cases and the closest one is about 3 Wrights and 4 Citaros being reflected as laid up in OM from the period between 19 August 2011 and 23 February 2012, while in fact during this period, they have been spotted doing BNDEP services and there was no lay up status reflected in their deployment pages. Similarly, SMB5046X cannot be said to be a non-revenue bus (since it had been reported to have been on service recently), but since the system of reflecting deployments have been reviewed and is therefore different from that of 2011, I would therefore refer this matter for your advice as well as that of the administrators.

	Cheers.		Cheers.

	--[[User:ASA1234\|ASA1234]] ([[User talk:ASA1234\|talk]]) 01:25, 7 April 2017 (+08)		--[[User:ASA1234\|ASA1234]] ([[User talk:ASA1234\|talk]]) 01:30, 7 April 2017 (+08)

ASA1234: /* Seeking clarification as to SMB5046X actual status. */ new section

2017-04-06T17:25:06Z

Seeking clarification as to SMB5046X actual status.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:25, 7 April 2017
Line 19:		Line 19:

	{{AdminMsg\|Supernutorcrazy\|19 Mar 2017\|1921}}		{{AdminMsg\|Supernutorcrazy\|19 Mar 2017\|1921}}

			== Seeking clarification as to SMB5046X actual status. ==

			I am filing this application seeking a clarification with regards to the legitimate/appropriate status to be listed for SMB5046X in both the [[Alexander Dennis Enviro500]] and [[SMRT Non-Revenue Buses]] pages. Recently, it has been reported by several bus enthusiasts in Facebook that SMB5046X had been repaired and back on service with the following differences as reflected on the former page:

			a) The red SMRT logos are now gapless.
			b) The bus is back with a new 'IMOB' advertisement.
			c) The bus is now from AMDEP, and is currently listed as AMDEP SP in the Enviro 500 age.

			However, official checks revealed that SMB5046X is still under official lay up till 11 August 2017 as reflected in the One Motoring website. While the bus deployment pages may not have been congruous with the non-revenue buses (e.g. some of the buses as unknown statuses in the latter do not have a 'N/A' status in the former in the case of those not officially laid up), some of those bus enthusiasts failed to realise that SMB5046X had actually been officially laid up previously and is, as of now, still officially laid up.

			I have checked on past similar cases and the closest one is about to 3 Wrights and 4 Citaros being reflected as laid up from the period between 19 August 2011 and 23 February 2012, while in fact during this period when reflected as laid up, they have been spotted doing BNDEP services and there was no lay up status reflected in their deployment pages. Similarly, SMB5046X cannot be said to be a non-revenue bus (since it had been reported to have been on service recently), but since the system of reflecting deployments have been reviewed and is therefore different from that of 2011, I would therefore refer this matter for your advice as well as that of the administrators.

			Cheers.

			--[[User:ASA1234\|ASA1234]] ([[User talk:ASA1234\|talk]]) 01:25, 7 April 2017 (+08)

Supernutorcrazy: /* Changing of Bus Image */ new section

2017-03-19T11:21:00Z

Changing of Bus Image: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:21, 19 March 2017
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\|\|'''[//sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS3602U&action=edit&section=new + Create a new topic]'''		\|\|'''[//sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS3602U&action=edit&section=new + Create a new topic]'''
	\|}		\|}

			== Changing of Bus Image ==

			Hi,

			I would like to highlight to you, as I had done to user Apex-LW'21, that the images posted by the new users does not required image attribution etc. if they are taken by themselves and upload, in acknowledge that sgWiki had CC (Creative Common - Fair Use). However, with the images we used to upload in the past belongs to other community groups, if they had contact us for usage of their image, we, as an administrator, are obliged to delete the images as describe by them due to copyright reasons.

			I hope that this clear the misconception of images need to have "image attribution". But of course, proper naming of images is required as per normal and proper credits should be given if using of other users images.

			Regards

			{{AdminMsg\|Supernutorcrazy\|19 Mar 2017\|1921}}

SBS3602U at 11:04, 28 February 2017

2017-02-28T11:04:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:04, 28 February 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{\| class="toccolours" width="100%" style="margin-bottom:1em"		{\| class="toccolours" width="100%" style="margin-bottom:1em; text-align:center; font-family:'Comic Sans MS';"
	\|-		\|-
	!~~style=text-align:center\|~~Welcome to my talk page.		!Welcome to my talk page.
	\|-		\|-
	\|Feel free to clarify anything regarding my edits here~~. I will try to respond ASAP (if there is a need to)~~. 👍		\|Feel free to clarify anything regarding my edits here. 👍
	\|-		\|-
	\|~~style=text-align:center~~\|'''[//sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS3602U&action=edit&section=new + Create a new topic]'''		\|\|'''[//sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS3602U&action=edit&section=new + Create a new topic]'''
	\|}		\|}

	~~== 5897G ==~~

	~~5897G is not 985 perm yet. Only done a few days does not mean it is a perm.~~
	~~:Hi, you might want to refer to this [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Services_969_-_985&diff=prev&oldid=374412 link]. @ SMB315C~~

SBS3602U: Okay then.

2017-02-06T17:19:03Z

Okay then.

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 |style=text-align:center|'''[//sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS3602U&action=edit&section=new + Create a new topic]'''
 |}
 == 5897G ==