User talk:SBS6301T - Revision history

Jade at 13:03, 6 June 2025

2025-06-06T13:03:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 6 June 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Reply		== Reply ==

	For the 63xx services, did not spot them on 53 instead all citaros from 54 have been consistently covering them. 6011E appears more often on 54 even during Saturdays from both kampong Bahru and Bishan. It sticks on the same slot or does another slot. Same for 6095M, it has been sticking to one of the slots on 54.		For the 63xx services, did not spot them on 53 instead all citaros from 54 have been consistently covering them. 6011E appears more often on 54 even during Saturdays from both kampong Bahru and Bishan. It sticks on the same slot or does another slot. Same for 6095M, it has been sticking to one of the slots on 54.

2022-12-20T10:56:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:56, 20 December 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Reply		==Reply

	~~Will monitor the crossovers further, did not spot the E shift on 410w from Bishan int.~~

	For the 63xx services, did not spot them on 53 instead all citaros from 54 have been consistently covering them. 6011E appears more often on 54 even during Saturdays from both kampong Bahru and Bishan. It sticks on the same slot or does another slot. Same for 6095M, it has been sticking to one of the slots on 54.		For the 63xx services, did not spot them on 53 instead all citaros from 54 have been consistently covering them. 6011E appears more often on 54 even during Saturdays from both kampong Bahru and Bishan. It sticks on the same slot or does another slot. Same for 6095M, it has been sticking to one of the slots on 54.

	There is definitely a shift of citaros to 53 and the old buses doing 54. Svc 54 uses either these ex53 citaros or pullover am service bus to do the other 3rd of the citaro that went over. Hope this helps.		There is definitely a shift of citaros to 53 and the old buses doing 54. Svc 54 uses either these ex53 citaros or pullover am service bus to do the other 3rd of the citaro that went over. Hope this helps.

			Today 6011E and 6095M is not on A or P shift on 53. 6751C is on 53 today. 54 not using the 66/67xx citaros

2022-12-19T17:30:03Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:30, 20 December 2022
Line 1:	Line 1:
		==Reply

		Will monitor the crossovers further, did not spot the E shift on 410w from Bishan int.

		For the 63xx services, did not spot them on 53 instead all citaros from 54 have been consistently covering them. 6011E appears more often on 54 even during Saturdays from both kampong Bahru and Bishan. It sticks on the same slot or does another slot. Same for 6095M, it has been sticking to one of the slots on 54.

		There is definitely a shift of citaros to 53 and the old buses doing 54. Svc 54 uses either these ex53 citaros or pullover am service bus to do the other 3rd of the citaro that went over. Hope this helps.

2016-07-06T09:43:38Z

Blanked the page

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:43, 6 July 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~== "Fake" deployments ==~~

	~~Hi SBS6301T.<br>~~

	~~As you have mentioned on your summary:<br>~~

	~~:''u dont even know what u r editing.... removing 1112 from 851 and adding 1147 to 854? all are fake in the first place''<br>~~

	My bad for editing those deployments wrongly, and yes. Those re-deployments were mentioned by a bus enthusiast, and assured me that it was 100% true. Count me unlucky to believe those false information.<br>

	~~[[User talk:SMB1341U\|SMB1341U]] 19/04/2015 18:11PM (SGT)~~

	~~:One more thing, please undo the edits properly..~~

	~~:[[User talk:SMB1341U\|SMB1341U]] 19/04/2015 18:12PM (SGT)~~

2015-04-19T10:11:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 19 April 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:

	[[User talk:SMB1341U\|SMB1341U]] 19/04/2015 18:11PM (SGT)		[[User talk:SMB1341U\|SMB1341U]] 19/04/2015 18:11PM (SGT)

			:One more thing, please undo the edits properly..

			:[[User talk:SMB1341U\|SMB1341U]] 19/04/2015 18:12PM (SGT)

2015-04-19T10:10:31Z

"Fake" deployments: new section

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:10, 19 April 2015
Line 1:	Line 1:
		== "Fake" deployments ==

		Hi SBS6301T.<br>

		As you have mentioned on your summary:<br>

		:''u dont even know what u r editing.... removing 1112 from 851 and adding 1147 to 854? all are fake in the first place''<br>

		My bad for editing those deployments wrongly, and yes. Those re-deployments were mentioned by a bus enthusiast, and assured me that it was 100% true. Count me unlucky to believe those false information.<br>

		[[User talk:SMB1341U\|SMB1341U]] 19/04/2015 18:11PM (SGT)

2014-08-11T13:33:22Z

solved

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:33, 11 August 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~== es ==~~

	Hi there. You must be wondering why is there a need to include the "es" on the [[MAN NL323F (Batch 3)]] page. I shall explain on behalf of User SBS3107H, since he doesn't explain to yoh the reason.<br>
	So basically, there's a need to add in the "es" is because as you know, some WLDEP spare buses may be redeployed to a WLBP service. That's why there's a need to add in the "buses" on new buses deployment pages, similarly to the upcoming [[Alexander Dennis Enviro500]] pages. Thank you.<br>
	~~[[User:SMB1341U\|SMB1341U]] ([[User talk:SMB1341U\|talk]]) 16:10 11/08/2014 (SGT)~~

	~~Oh okay thanks for explaining to me~~
	~~[[User:SBS6301T\|SBS6301T]] ([[User talk:SBS6301T\|talk]]) 20:10 11/08/2014 (SGT)~~

2014-08-11T12:10:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:10, 11 August 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:
	So basically, there's a need to add in the "es" is because as you know, some WLDEP spare buses may be redeployed to a WLBP service. That's why there's a need to add in the "buses" on new buses deployment pages, similarly to the upcoming [[Alexander Dennis Enviro500]] pages. Thank you.<br>		So basically, there's a need to add in the "es" is because as you know, some WLDEP spare buses may be redeployed to a WLBP service. That's why there's a need to add in the "buses" on new buses deployment pages, similarly to the upcoming [[Alexander Dennis Enviro500]] pages. Thank you.<br>
	[[User:SMB1341U\|SMB1341U]] ([[User talk:SMB1341U\|talk]]) 16:10 11/08/2014 (SGT)		[[User:SMB1341U\|SMB1341U]] ([[User talk:SMB1341U\|talk]]) 16:10 11/08/2014 (SGT)

			Oh okay thanks for explaining to me
			[[User:SBS6301T\|SBS6301T]] ([[User talk:SBS6301T\|talk]]) 20:10 11/08/2014 (SGT)

2014-08-11T08:09:58Z

es: new section

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:09, 11 August 2014
Line 1:	Line 1:
		== es ==

		Hi there. You must be wondering why is there a need to include the "es" on the [[MAN NL323F (Batch 3)]] page. I shall explain on behalf of User SBS3107H, since he doesn't explain to yoh the reason.<br>
		So basically, there's a need to add in the "es" is because as you know, some WLDEP spare buses may be redeployed to a WLBP service. That's why there's a need to add in the "buses" on new buses deployment pages, similarly to the upcoming [[Alexander Dennis Enviro500]] pages. Thank you.<br>
		[[User:SMB1341U\|SMB1341U]] ([[User talk:SMB1341U\|talk]]) 16:10 11/08/2014 (SGT)

2014-07-17T14:06:36Z

Blanked the page

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:06, 17 July 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Please do not remove any content from this page.~~