User talk:SG5064X - Revision history

SG5064X: /* Edit */

2026-05-10T12:34:47Z

Edit

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:34, 10 May 2026
Line 102:		Line 102:

	Alright thank you!		Alright thank you!

	~~== Edit ==~~

	~~Hi,~~

	~~It has been more than one occasion despite verfication you removed edit based on what you perceived it right.~~

	First instance: SG5947Z— has been on 922 and you kept removing when user X put. You emphasised of consulting facts, have you truly consulted the fact? Can you explain then why even till now when 5930X came back it is still on Feeder 922?

	Second instance: in February despite verifying with e-mail evidence from Sherine from SMRT management on 190 bendy arrangement, you still remove what is your intention? Did you again consult upper up for the fact or is it implied that Sherine from management is not speaking the truth?

	Third instance: in 2024/2025 when the LTA Christmas is meant for 190, you kept on removing despite LTA evident it through their social media, again what is your intention? Did you consult the deployment team on that?

	Fourth instance: SMRT 190 using E bus as a perm arrangement in mid-November with perm rego, you kept denying and insisting as cameo and so what is your take on this? Have you consult with the upper up on that? (Does not include admin/senior users)

	Fifth instance: SG5597A as far as I see and took on 190 on Saturdays in April (more than once), I am very skeptical about your edit on that. But fine since you think it is, I leave it. However, since end 2025, 190 B9TL operating on 983 on Saturdays is regular. Just because you didn’t take notice or disagree, dosen’t mean it is non-existent.

	As a senior user, I have always respected your edit but you have to respect what others edit especially when things are so evident. While I respect the agree to disagree, but not in the extent of denying edit. No one is always right even admins will also have misobs so I hope this come clear cut. Don’t make things difficult as it already is. I would love to hear your take and your action plans on '''all 5 instances'''. Thank you.

TIB1152X 190: /* Edit */

2026-05-10T12:14:13Z

Edit

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 10 May 2026
Line 111:		Line 111:
	First instance: SG5947Z— has been on 922 and you kept removing when user X put. You emphasised of consulting facts, have you truly consulted the fact? Can you explain then why even till now when 5930X came back it is still on Feeder 922?		First instance: SG5947Z— has been on 922 and you kept removing when user X put. You emphasised of consulting facts, have you truly consulted the fact? Can you explain then why even till now when 5930X came back it is still on Feeder 922?

	Second instance: in February despite verifying with e-mail evidence from Sherine from SMRT management on 190 bendy arrangement, you still remove what is your intention?		Second instance: in February despite verifying with e-mail evidence from Sherine from SMRT management on 190 bendy arrangement, you still remove what is your intention? Did you again consult upper up for the fact or is it implied that Sherine from management is not speaking the truth?

	Third instance: in 2024/2025 when the LTA Christmas is meant for 190, you kept on removing despite LTA evident it through their social media, again what is your intention?		Third instance: in 2024/2025 when the LTA Christmas is meant for 190, you kept on removing despite LTA evident it through their social media, again what is your intention? Did you consult the deployment team on that?

	Fourth instance: SMRT 190 using E bus as a perm arrangement in mid-November with perm rego, you kept denying and insisting as cameo and so what is your take on this?		Fourth instance: SMRT 190 using E bus as a perm arrangement in mid-November with perm rego, you kept denying and insisting as cameo and so what is your take on this? Have you consult with the upper up on that? (Does not include admin/senior users)

	Fifth instance: SG5597A as far as I see and took on 190 on Saturdays in April (more than once), I am very skeptical about your edit on that. But fine since you think it is, I leave it. However, since end 2025, 190 B9TL operating on 983 on Saturdays is regular. Just because you didn’t take notice or disagree, dosen’t mean it is non-existent.		Fifth instance: SG5597A as far as I see and took on 190 on Saturdays in April (more than once), I am very skeptical about your edit on that. But fine since you think it is, I leave it. However, since end 2025, 190 B9TL operating on 983 on Saturdays is regular. Just because you didn’t take notice or disagree, dosen’t mean it is non-existent.

	As a senior user, I have always respected your edit but you have to respect what others edit especially when things are so evident. While I respect the agree to disagree, but not in the extent of denying edit. No one is always right even admins will also have misobs so I hope this come clear cut. Don’t make things difficult as it already is. I would love to hear your take on '''all 5 instances'''. Thank you.		As a senior user, I have always respected your edit but you have to respect what others edit especially when things are so evident. While I respect the agree to disagree, but not in the extent of denying edit. No one is always right even admins will also have misobs so I hope this come clear cut. Don’t make things difficult as it already is. I would love to hear your take and your action plans on '''all 5 instances'''. Thank you.

TIB1152X 190: /* Edit */

2026-05-10T12:04:16Z

Edit

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:04, 10 May 2026
Line 109:		Line 109:
	It has been more than one occasion despite verfication you removed edit based on what you perceived it right.		It has been more than one occasion despite verfication you removed edit based on what you perceived it right.

	First instance: SG5947Z— has been on 922 and you kept removing when user X put.		First instance: SG5947Z— has been on 922 and you kept removing when user X put. You emphasised of consulting facts, have you truly consulted the fact? Can you explain then why even till now when 5930X came back it is still on Feeder 922?

	Second instance: in February despite verifying with e-mail evidence from Sherine from SMRT management on 190 bendy arrangement, you still remove what is your intention?		Second instance: in February despite verifying with e-mail evidence from Sherine from SMRT management on 190 bendy arrangement, you still remove what is your intention?
Line 119:		Line 119:
	Fifth instance: SG5597A as far as I see and took on 190 on Saturdays in April (more than once), I am very skeptical about your edit on that. But fine since you think it is, I leave it. However, since end 2025, 190 B9TL operating on 983 on Saturdays is regular. Just because you didn’t take notice or disagree, dosen’t mean it is non-existent.		Fifth instance: SG5597A as far as I see and took on 190 on Saturdays in April (more than once), I am very skeptical about your edit on that. But fine since you think it is, I leave it. However, since end 2025, 190 B9TL operating on 983 on Saturdays is regular. Just because you didn’t take notice or disagree, dosen’t mean it is non-existent.

	As a senior user, I have always respected your edit but you have to respect what others edit especially when things are so evident. While I respect the agree to disagree, but not in the extent of denying edit. No one is always right even admins will also have misobs so I hope this come clear cut. Don’t make things difficult as it already is.		As a senior user, I have always respected your edit but you have to respect what others edit especially when things are so evident. While I respect the agree to disagree, but not in the extent of denying edit. No one is always right even admins will also have misobs so I hope this come clear cut. Don’t make things difficult as it already is. I would love to hear your take on '''all 5 instances'''. Thank you.

TIB1152X 190: /* Edit */

2026-05-10T12:00:31Z

Edit

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 10 May 2026
Line 119:		Line 119:
	Fifth instance: SG5597A as far as I see and took on 190 on Saturdays in April (more than once), I am very skeptical about your edit on that. But fine since you think it is, I leave it. However, since end 2025, 190 B9TL operating on 983 on Saturdays is regular. Just because you didn’t take notice or disagree, dosen’t mean it is non-existent.		Fifth instance: SG5597A as far as I see and took on 190 on Saturdays in April (more than once), I am very skeptical about your edit on that. But fine since you think it is, I leave it. However, since end 2025, 190 B9TL operating on 983 on Saturdays is regular. Just because you didn’t take notice or disagree, dosen’t mean it is non-existent.

	As a senior user, I have always respected your edit but you have to respect what others edit especially when things are so evident. While I respect the agree to disagree, but not in the extent of denying edit. No one is always right even admins will also have misobs so I hope this come clear cut.		As a senior user, I have always respected your edit but you have to respect what others edit especially when things are so evident. While I respect the agree to disagree, but not in the extent of denying edit. No one is always right even admins will also have misobs so I hope this come clear cut. Don’t make things difficult as it already is.

TIB1152X 190: /* Edit */ new section

2026-05-10T11:58:23Z

Edit: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 10 May 2026
Line 102:		Line 102:

	Alright thank you!		Alright thank you!

			== Edit ==

			Hi,

			It has been more than one occasion despite verfication you removed edit based on what you perceived it right.

			First instance: SG5947Z— has been on 922 and you kept removing when user X put.

			Second instance: in February despite verifying with e-mail evidence from Sherine from SMRT management on 190 bendy arrangement, you still remove what is your intention?

			Third instance: in 2024/2025 when the LTA Christmas is meant for 190, you kept on removing despite LTA evident it through their social media, again what is your intention?

			Fourth instance: SMRT 190 using E bus as a perm arrangement in mid-November with perm rego, you kept denying and insisting as cameo and so what is your take on this?

			Fifth instance: SG5597A as far as I see and took on 190 on Saturdays in April (more than once), I am very skeptical about your edit on that. But fine since you think it is, I leave it. However, since end 2025, 190 B9TL operating on 983 on Saturdays is regular. Just because you didn’t take notice or disagree, dosen’t mean it is non-existent.

			As a senior user, I have always respected your edit but you have to respect what others edit especially when things are so evident. While I respect the agree to disagree, but not in the extent of denying edit. No one is always right even admins will also have misobs so I hope this come clear cut.

SG5064X: /* GBDEP Zhongtong N12 buses MIA */

2026-01-29T12:51:23Z

GBDEP Zhongtong N12 buses MIA

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:51, 29 January 2026
Line 102:		Line 102:

	Alright thank you!		Alright thank you!

	~~== GBDEP Zhongtong N12 buses MIA ==~~

	~~Where have the GBDEP ZT buses went? Spotted none on 280126. Would appreciate any insights about it thanks!~~




	~~=== Reply: ===~~

	~~Alright, noted on this. Thanks for the helpful clarification!~~

	~~Cheers,~~
	~~SG5064X~~

TIB832Z: /* GBDEP Zhongtong N12 buses MIA */

2026-01-29T12:34:17Z

GBDEP Zhongtong N12 buses MIA

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:34, 29 January 2026
Line 107:		Line 107:
	Where have the GBDEP ZT buses went? Spotted none on 280126. Would appreciate any insights about it thanks!		Where have the GBDEP ZT buses went? Spotted none on 280126. Would appreciate any insights about it thanks!

	~~== GBDEP Zhongtong N12 buses MIA ==~~

	~~Hi SG5064X,~~

	Just to let you know all GB ZT N12s are grounded in depot today and none of them are running, probably due to a design/software flaw as an incident occurred recently where safety of pax was compromised. Hence staff are still looking to resolve this issue. Hope this helps!

	~~Cheers,~~
	~~TIB832Z~~

SG5064X: /* GBDEP Zhongtong N12 buses MIA */

2026-01-28T14:41:08Z

GBDEP Zhongtong N12 buses MIA

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:41, 28 January 2026
Line 117:		Line 117:


	Reply:		=== Reply: ===

	Alright, noted on this. Thanks for the helpful clarification!		Alright, noted on this. Thanks for the helpful clarification!

SG5064X: /* GBDEP Zhongtong N12 buses MIA */

2026-01-28T14:19:35Z

GBDEP Zhongtong N12 buses MIA

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 28 January 2026
Line 118:		Line 118:

	Reply:		Reply:

	Alright, noted on this. Thanks for the helpful clarification!		Alright, noted on this. Thanks for the helpful clarification!

	Cheers,		Cheers,
	SG5064X		SG5064X

SG5064X: /* GBDEP Zhongtong N12 buses MIA */

2026-01-28T14:19:22Z

GBDEP Zhongtong N12 buses MIA

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 28 January 2026
Line 115:		Line 115:
	Cheers,		Cheers,
	TIB832Z		TIB832Z


			Reply:
			Alright, noted on this. Thanks for the helpful clarification!

			Cheers,
			SG5064X