User talk:Supernutorcrazy - Revision history

CastJared: Undo revision 705860 by Gabrielchong (talk)

2025-09-16T01:47:25Z

Undo revision 705860 by Gabrielchong (talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:47, 16 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{Deletion\|User/Talk page of a banned user. Admin please ban this rouge user that anyhow ban people and disrupt to sgwiki.}}~~

Gabrielchong at 22:53, 15 September 2025

2025-09-15T22:53:12Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 06:53, 16 September 2025
Line 1:	Line 1:
		{{Deletion\|User/Talk page of a banned user. Admin please ban this rouge user that anyhow ban people and disrupt to sgwiki.}}

Alphabetlorefan1: Blanked the page

2025-09-15T05:19:20Z

Blanked the page

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:19, 15 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{Deletion\|This is a rouge user. He/she should be banned.}}~~

Gabrielchong at 05:04, 15 September 2025

2025-09-15T05:04:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:04, 15 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Deletion\|This is a rouge user}}		{{Deletion\|This is a rouge user. He/she should be banned.}}

Gabrielchong at 05:03, 15 September 2025

2025-09-15T05:03:32Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:03, 15 September 2025
Line 1:	Line 1:
		{{Deletion\|This is a rouge user}}

Supernutorcrazy: Nope I am done here and retrieve necessary things for migration. Goodbye!

2025-09-06T23:08:21Z

Nope I am done here and retrieve necessary things for migration. Goodbye!

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:08, 7 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~==Revert==~~
	~~Good day,~~

	~~Yes, I have reviewed your newly created wiki. All the best moving forward.~~

	~~I may need a bit more time to revert the pages, but I truly appreciate all the effort and input you and the other users have contributed so far.~~

	~~Regarding the bus templates, I will take some time to rethink on how to consolidate them into a unified template.~~

	~~Cheers.~~

	~~I Don't Want To Be New Once In SgWiki! I Want The Old Type!~~

	~~==Ban practice==~~
	~~Hi.~~

	~~Sorry for the late response. Overlooked your message.~~

	Given that the sgWiki Buses section is still reverting to the former format, it would be better if we were less harsh on the punishment for disruptive editing. Although I have blocked numerous accounts with an indefinite ban in the past, I believe we should follow the SgWiki:Guidebook/Ban that was mainly drafted by you, which I agreed to 5 years ago.

	It is also unfair for those editors who constantly have to help synchronise the edits repeatedly. However, given the wiki's inconsistent formatting across the pages, these individuals are trying to update the wiki despite not wanting to contribute to the format revert, which is their right and decision to do so. Thankful for you and the other few editors who made time and effort to revert the pages. It is a pity that I could not contribute as much as I did in the past. However, I will try my best to help out when time permits.

	Also, given the bad reputation of the wiki, these indefinite bans would only deter the small community of editors from contributing to the wiki. I am also aware that the wiki is quite inaccurate (at least for the bus deployments & advertisements section) since 2018. Some individuals are against our way of managing the wiki, especially you, since I was away for a specific period.

	~~You should consider promoting user Kimminju as an Admin. This user would make a great candidate to handle the administrative matters in the wiki in the coming years.~~

	~~Cheers.~~

	~~===Update===~~
	~~My bad. I was in the midst of writing the above and did not notice your latest message.~~

	~~I am actually satisfied with the proposal that you made in September 2020.~~

	~~Hope to reduce the reliance on indefinite bans since they have proved ineffective over the past few years.~~

	~~Thanks.~~

	~~== Ban Practice ==~~

	~~Dear admin,~~

	I am writing to express my concern regarding the recent ban placed on my account on multiple occasions. I believe this decision may have been made in error or without full consideration of the circumstances.

	I respectfully request clarification on the exact reason for this ban, including any specific evidence or incidents cited. From my perspective, I have not engaged in any actions that would warrant such a penalty, and the ban feels both unexpected and unfair.

	~~I would appreciate the opportunity to present my side of the situation and provide any context that may have been overlooked. I trust that upon review, you will find that a reinstatement is justified.~~

	~~Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.~~

	~~Sincerely,~~
	~~Haram~~

	~~== Regarding my ban ==~~

	I am writing this message to understand this. With the point you helped me sync for 3548C, just want to say it never permed 190 while 67 and 190 DDs are interchangeable. I am pretty sure I always saw this bus on 67 more than 100 times. And that, I forgot to add that summary where "it never perm 190" and "no former deployment" earlier before you block me. Now before you block other users regarding forner deployments, check their summary.

	~~RobloxXF~~

	~~== Deleting bus pages ==~~
	~~Hi, you have deleted several bus service pages that haven't revert to the old format. Can you restore them?~~

	~~Thanks.~~

Kimminju at 14:27, 5 September 2025

2025-09-05T14:27:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:27, 5 September 2025
Line 56:		Line 56:

	RobloxXF		RobloxXF

			== Deleting bus pages ==
			Hi, you have deleted several bus service pages that haven't revert to the old format. Can you restore them?

			Thanks.

SMB315C: Reverted edit by Kimminju is GOAT (talk) to last revision by RobloxXF

2025-09-04T14:19:50Z

Reverted edit by Kimminju is GOAT (talk) to last revision by RobloxXF

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 4 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{deletion\|banned~~ this ~~stupid admin!}}~~		==Revert==
			Good day,

			Yes, I have reviewed your newly created wiki. All the best moving forward.

			I may need a bit more time to revert the pages, but I truly appreciate all the effort and input you and the other users have contributed so far.

			Regarding the bus templates, I will take some time to rethink on how to consolidate them into a unified template.

			Cheers.

			I Don't Want To Be New Once In SgWiki! I Want The Old Type!

			==Ban practice==
			Hi.

			Sorry for the late response. Overlooked your message.

			Given that the sgWiki Buses section is still reverting to the former format, it would be better if we were less harsh on the punishment for disruptive editing. Although I have blocked numerous accounts with an indefinite ban in the past, I believe we should follow the SgWiki:Guidebook/Ban that was mainly drafted by you, which I agreed to 5 years ago.

			It is also unfair for those editors who constantly have to help synchronise the edits repeatedly. However, given the wiki's inconsistent formatting across the pages, these individuals are trying to update the wiki despite not wanting to contribute to the format revert, which is their right and decision to do so. Thankful for you and the other few editors who made time and effort to revert the pages. It is a pity that I could not contribute as much as I did in the past. However, I will try my best to help out when time permits.

			Also, given the bad reputation of the wiki, these indefinite bans would only deter the small community of editors from contributing to the wiki. I am also aware that the wiki is quite inaccurate (at least for the bus deployments & advertisements section) since 2018. Some individuals are against our way of managing the wiki, especially you, since I was away for a specific period.

			You should consider promoting user Kimminju as an Admin. This user would make a great candidate to handle the administrative matters in the wiki in the coming years.

			Cheers.

			===Update===
			My bad. I was in the midst of writing the above and did not notice your latest message.

			I am actually satisfied with the proposal that you made in September 2020.

			Hope to reduce the reliance on indefinite bans since they have proved ineffective over the past few years.

			Thanks.

			== Ban Practice ==

			Dear admin,

			I am writing to express my concern regarding the recent ban placed on my account on multiple occasions. I believe this decision may have been made in error or without full consideration of the circumstances.

			I respectfully request clarification on the exact reason for this ban, including any specific evidence or incidents cited. From my perspective, I have not engaged in any actions that would warrant such a penalty, and the ban feels both unexpected and unfair.

			I would appreciate the opportunity to present my side of the situation and provide any context that may have been overlooked. I trust that upon review, you will find that a reinstatement is justified.

			Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.

			Sincerely,
			Haram

			== Regarding my ban ==

			I am writing this message to understand this. With the point you helped me sync for 3548C, just want to say it never permed 190 while 67 and 190 DDs are interchangeable. I am pretty sure I always saw this bus on 67 more than 100 times. And that, I forgot to add that summary where "it never perm 190" and "no former deployment" earlier before you block me. Now before you block other users regarding forner deployments, check their summary.

			RobloxXF

Kimminju is GOAT: Replaced content with "{{deletion|banned this stupid admin!}}"

2025-09-04T13:44:13Z

Replaced content with "{{deletion|banned this stupid admin!}}"

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:44, 4 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~==Revert==~~		{{deletion\|banned this stupid admin!}}
	~~Good day,~~

	~~Yes, I have reviewed your newly created wiki. All the best moving forward.~~

	~~I may need a bit more time to revert the pages, but I truly appreciate all the effort and input you and the other users have contributed so far.~~

	~~Regarding the bus templates, I will take some time to rethink on how to consolidate them into a unified template.~~

	~~Cheers.~~

	~~I Don't Want To Be New Once In SgWiki~~! ~~I Want The Old Type!~~

	~~==Ban practice==~~
	~~Hi.~~

	~~Sorry for the late response. Overlooked your message.~~

	Given that the sgWiki Buses section is still reverting to the former format, it would be better if we were less harsh on the punishment for disruptive editing. Although I have blocked numerous accounts with an indefinite ban in the past, I believe we should follow the SgWiki:Guidebook/Ban that was mainly drafted by you, which I agreed to 5 years ago.

	It is also unfair for those editors who constantly have to help synchronise the edits repeatedly. However, given the wiki's inconsistent formatting across the pages, these individuals are trying to update the wiki despite not wanting to contribute to the format revert, which is their right and decision to do so. Thankful for you and the other few editors who made time and effort to revert the pages. It is a pity that I could not contribute as much as I did in the past. However, I will try my best to help out when time permits.

	Also, given the bad reputation of the wiki, these indefinite bans would only deter the small community of editors from contributing to the wiki. I am also aware that the wiki is quite inaccurate (at least for the bus deployments & advertisements section) since 2018. Some individuals are against our way of managing the wiki, especially you, since I was away for a specific period.

	~~You should consider promoting user Kimminju as an Admin. This user would make a great candidate to handle the administrative matters in the wiki in the coming years.~~

	~~Cheers.~~

	~~===Update===~~
	~~My bad. I was in the midst of writing the above and did not notice your latest message.~~

	~~I am actually satisfied with the proposal that you made in September 2020.~~

	~~Hope to reduce the reliance on indefinite bans since they have proved ineffective over the past few years.~~

	~~Thanks.~~

	~~== Ban Practice ==~~

	~~Dear admin,~~

	I am writing to express my concern regarding the recent ban placed on my account on multiple occasions. I believe this decision may have been made in error or without full consideration of the circumstances.

	I respectfully request clarification on the exact reason for this ban, including any specific evidence or incidents cited. From my perspective, I have not engaged in any actions that would warrant such a penalty, and the ban feels both unexpected and unfair.

	~~I would appreciate the opportunity to present my side of the situation and provide any context that may have been overlooked. I trust that upon review, you will find that a reinstatement is justified.~~

	~~Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response.~~

	~~Sincerely,~~
	~~Haram~~

	~~== Regarding my ban ==~~

	I am writing this message to understand this. With the point you helped me sync for 3548C, just want to say it never permed 190 while 67 and 190 DDs are interchangeable. I am pretty sure I always saw this bus on 67 more than 100 times. And that, I forgot to add that summary where "it never perm 190" and "no former deployment" earlier before you block me. Now before you block other users regarding forner deployments, check their summary.

	~~RobloxXF~~

RobloxXF: /* Regarding my ban */ new section

2025-08-15T09:22:24Z

Regarding my ban: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:22, 15 August 2025
Line 50:		Line 50:
	Sincerely,		Sincerely,
	Haram		Haram

			== Regarding my ban ==

			I am writing this message to understand this. With the point you helped me sync for 3548C, just want to say it never permed 190 while 67 and 190 DDs are interchangeable. I am pretty sure I always saw this bus on 67 more than 100 times. And that, I forgot to add that summary where "it never perm 190" and "no former deployment" earlier before you block me. Now before you block other users regarding forner deployments, check their summary.

			RobloxXF