User talk:Wekelwrady - Revision history

Wekelwrady: Blanked the page

2025-07-01T06:46:45Z

Blanked the page

Supernutorcrazy: /* Update */

2025-06-11T23:18:55Z

Update

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:18, 12 June 2025
Line 382:		Line 382:
	Regards<br>		Regards<br>
	[[User:Supernutorcrazy\|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy\|talk]]) 20:46, 11 June 2025 (+08)		[[User:Supernutorcrazy\|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy\|talk]]) 20:46, 11 June 2025 (+08)

			===Reply===
			Hi,

			I am planning to do the NSL till Bishan, then do the TEL from Woodlands North to Caldecott, before returning back for NSL between Bishan to MSP.

			As for the colour of the train cars, I am planning it to allow user for a quick glance on the carriage position, like front = red, mid = green for NSEWL. For NEL since all car have the same, I am thinking of using the NSEWL colour coding over for quick positioning. The rest of the lines can use the respective train colour scheme (whether to flip or not doesn't matter).

			Regards

			[[User:Supernutorcrazy\|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy\|talk]]) 07:18, 12 June 2025 (+08)

Supernutorcrazy: /* Reply */

2025-06-11T12:46:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:46, 11 June 2025
Line 338:		Line 338:

	Regarding the circle with arrow, you meant it like this right?		Regarding the circle with arrow, you meant it like this right?
			{\|
	{{StnLayout/Platform\|C\|TEL\|0\|<div>{{Stn/Bayshore}}</div>\|		{{StnLayout/Platform\|C\|TEL\|0\|<div>{{Stn/Bayshore}}</div>\|
	{{StnLayout/Stn\|align=right\|angle=45\|width=8em\|lines=<div style='position:absolute;top:9.5em;left:7em;width:101em;border-bottom:0.6em solid;{{CSS/TEL\|xbg=\|xfc=}}'></div>\|bg=#000\|codes={{Code/S\|TE2\|TEL\|bs=solid solid none}}{{Code/S\|NS9\|NSL\|bs=none solid solid}}\|name={{Stn\|Woodlands\|c=#fff}}}}		{{StnLayout/Stn\|align=right\|angle=45\|width=8em\|lines=<div style='position:absolute;top:9.5em;left:7em;width:101em;border-bottom:0.6em solid;{{CSS/TEL\|xbg=\|xfc=}}'></div>\|bg=#000\|codes={{Code/S\|TE2\|TEL\|bs=solid solid none}}{{Code/S\|NS9\|NSL\|bs=none solid solid}}\|name={{Stn\|Woodlands\|c=#fff}}}}
Line 367:		Line 368:
	{{StnLayout/Stn\|align=right\|angle=45\|codes={{Code/S\|TE29\|TEL}}<small>(65 mins)</small>\|name={{Stn\|Bayshore\|c=#000}}}}		{{StnLayout/Stn\|align=right\|angle=45\|codes={{Code/S\|TE29\|TEL}}<small>(65 mins)</small>\|name={{Stn\|Bayshore\|c=#000}}}}
	\|width=89rem}}		\|width=89rem}}
			\|}

	If this is the case, I think is doable and could further clearly show the loop nature for CCL6, and the LRT, if it was a circular route diagram.		If this is the case, I think is doable and could further clearly show the loop nature for CCL6, and the LRT, if it was a circular route diagram.
Line 372:		Line 374:
	Regarding the train formation, using the various sizes box is great, but I will still need some time to think on how to align the box and the layout, as this would involve lots of colspan and rowspan or equivilant in coming out with the proper sizing. I am not too concern for TEL to NSEWL conversion, because I could easier use your method to pad left or right, but the JRL to NSEWL conversion would be a key concern. A 3 car JRL train would only be about 2.5 car NSEWL tain length in average.		Regarding the train formation, using the various sizes box is great, but I will still need some time to think on how to align the box and the layout, as this would involve lots of colspan and rowspan or equivilant in coming out with the proper sizing. I am not too concern for TEL to NSEWL conversion, because I could easier use your method to pad left or right, but the JRL to NSEWL conversion would be a key concern. A 3 car JRL train would only be about 2.5 car NSEWL tain length in average.

	Regards		Regards<br>
	[[User:Supernutorcrazy\|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy\|talk]]) 08:13, 7 June 2025 (+08)		[[User:Supernutorcrazy\|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy\|talk]]) 08:13, 7 June 2025 (+08)

			==Update==
			I had trial your proposal platform method at {{Stn\|Woodlands}}, please have a look and let me know your opinion so we can rolled it out to the rest.

			Regards<br>
			[[User:Supernutorcrazy\|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy\|talk]]) 20:46, 11 June 2025 (+08)

Wekelwrady: /* Remark */

2025-06-07T06:10:58Z

Remark

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:10, 7 June 2025
Line 374:		Line 374:
	Regards		Regards
	[[User:Supernutorcrazy\|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy\|talk]]) 08:13, 7 June 2025 (+08)		[[User:Supernutorcrazy\|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy\|talk]]) 08:13, 7 June 2025 (+08)

	~~===Remark===~~
	~~I think I have one more question. Is there a way this can be made as wide as the current arrangement?~~

Supernutorcrazy at 00:13, 7 June 2025

2025-06-07T00:13:27Z

@@ Line 276: / Line 276: @@
 {{StnLayout/Platform|C|TEL|0|<div>{{Stn/Bayshore}}</div>|
 	{{StnLayout/Stn|align=right|angle=45|width=8em|lines=<div style='position:absolute;top:9.5em;left:7em;width:99em;border-bottom:0.6em solid;{{CSS/TEL|xbg=|xfc=}}'></div>|bg=#000|codes={{Code/S|TE2|TEL|bs=solid solid none}}{{Code/S|NS9|NSL|bs=none solid solid}}|name={{Stn|Woodlands|c=#fff}}}}
 	{{StnLayout/Stn|align=right|angle=45|codes={{Code/S|TE3|TEL}}<small>(2 mins)</small>|name={{Stn|Woodlands South|c=#000}}}}
 	{{StnLayout/Stn|align=right|angle=45|codes={{Code/S|TE4|TEL}}<small>(7 mins)</small>|name={{Stn|Springleaf|c=#000}}}}
@@ Line 332: / Line 333: @@
 [[User:Supernutorcrazy|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy|talk]]) 21:41, 20 May 2025 (+08)
 ===Remark===
 I think I have one more question. Is there a way this can be made as wide as the current arrangement?

Alphabetlorefan1: /* Combine Service xxG/xxW into one single page */ Thanks as well, you had worked hard. Keep it up

2025-05-24T09:27:54Z

Combine Service xxG/xxW into one single page: Thanks as well, you had worked hard. Keep it up

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:27, 24 May 2025
Line 17:		Line 17:

	[[User:Supernutorcrazy\|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy\|talk]]) 17:26, 5 April 2025 (+08)		[[User:Supernutorcrazy\|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy\|talk]]) 17:26, 5 April 2025 (+08)

	~~== Combine Service xxG/xxW into one single page ==~~

	~~Hi Wekelwrady, good suggestion if I can see your table put onto your userpage, for Bus Service 84. Maybe we can use that? Leave message to the admin, so that the admin will allow.~~

	~~Thanks~~

	~~[[User:Alphabetlorefan1\|Alphabetlorefan1]] ([[User talk:Alphabetlorefan1\|talk]]) 7 April 2025, 11:32~~

	==Re: Point about G/W directional==		==Re: Point about G/W directional==

Supernutorcrazy: /* MRT Station Exits & Layout */

2025-05-20T13:41:35Z

MRT Station Exits & Layout

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:41, 20 May 2025
Line 329:		Line 329:
	\|Transfer Linkway between TEL Concourse & WBI		\|Transfer Linkway between TEL Concourse & WBI
	\|}		\|}

			===Reply===
			I look forward your trial for schematic track diagram. I had a hard time doing the = border for route diagram replacement.

			Regarding the platform and train layout for CCK, JUR and TNM, I had not much of news on how the alignment will be and we shall know in 2028. How the parallel alignment to the front or back or middle of the platform is still a mystery. But nevertheless, we shall plan ahead for such planning if not we may need another overhaul coming 2028...

			I had put the trial on Marsiling station for the layout.

			Regards

			[[User:Supernutorcrazy\|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy\|talk]]) 21:41, 20 May 2025 (+08)

	===Remark===		===Remark===
	I think I have one more question. Is there a way this can be made as wide as the current arrangement?		I think I have one more question. Is there a way this can be made as wide as the current arrangement?

Supernutorcrazy: /* MRT Station Exits & Layout */

2025-05-19T13:42:17Z

MRT Station Exits & Layout

Show changes

Wekelwrady: thanks!

2025-05-19T09:42:16Z

thanks!

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 19 May 2025
Line 271:		Line 271:
	===Remark===		===Remark===
	I think I have one more question. Is there a way this can be made as wide as the current arrangement?		I think I have one more question. Is there a way this can be made as wide as the current arrangement?

	~~== Autoblock ID #31923 ==~~

	~~Requesting admin assistance~~

Wekelwrady: /* Autoblock ID #31923 */ new section

2025-05-19T03:51:54Z

Autoblock ID #31923: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:51, 19 May 2025
Line 271:		Line 271:
	===Remark===		===Remark===
	I think I have one more question. Is there a way this can be made as wide as the current arrangement?		I think I have one more question. Is there a way this can be made as wide as the current arrangement?

			== Autoblock ID #31923 ==

			Requesting admin assistance