User talk:Xenon - Revision history

Xenon at 10:59, 16 August 2013

2013-08-16T10:59:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 16 August 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[User:Xenon\|Xenon]]		[[User:Xenon\|Xenon]]

	~~==Askale==~~
	What 'Askale' said is that SBS6314G was once a AMDEP 53 permer and he had seen it personally, though it only appeared on certain fixed BSEP timings allocated for Sv 53. It was later been appearing as cameo, though it was a stagnant permer of 53 under BSEP (it however, did not return to 53 quite often, as you mentioned).<BR>

	~~SBS6320M is a 29 permer.<br>~~

	~~--[[User:Apex-LW'21\|Apex-LW'21]] 19:02, 14 June 2013 (SGT)~~

	~~Thanks for the clarification of the last part in the first paragraph. However, he's still undoing those edits constantly and keep saying that SBS6320M isn't a former BNDEP(not CGBP) 29 permer.~~

	~~[[User:Xenon\|Xenon]] 01:09, 15 June 2013 (SGT)~~

Xenon at 17:10, 14 June 2013

2013-06-14T17:10:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:10, 15 June 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[User:Xenon\|Xenon]]		[[User:Xenon\|Xenon]]


	==Askale==		==Askale==

Xenon at 17:09, 14 June 2013

2013-06-14T17:09:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:09, 15 June 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:


			==Askale==
	What 'Askale' said is that SBS6314G was once a AMDEP 53 permer and he had seen it personally, though it only appeared on certain fixed BSEP timings allocated for Sv 53. It was later been appearing as cameo, though it was a stagnant permer of 53 under BSEP (it however, did not return to 53 quite often, as you mentioned).<BR>		What 'Askale' said is that SBS6314G was once a AMDEP 53 permer and he had seen it personally, though it only appeared on certain fixed BSEP timings allocated for Sv 53. It was later been appearing as cameo, though it was a stagnant permer of 53 under BSEP (it however, did not return to 53 quite often, as you mentioned).<BR>

Xenon at 17:09, 14 June 2013

2013-06-14T17:09:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:09, 15 June 2013
Line 10:		Line 10:

	--[[User:Apex-LW'21\|Apex-LW'21]] 19:02, 14 June 2013 (SGT)		--[[User:Apex-LW'21\|Apex-LW'21]] 19:02, 14 June 2013 (SGT)

			Thanks for the clarification of the last part in the first paragraph. However, he's still undoing those edits constantly and keep saying that SBS6320M isn't a former BNDEP(not CGBP) 29 permer.

			[[User:Xenon\|Xenon]] 01:09, 15 June 2013 (SGT)

Apex-LW'21 at 11:02, 14 June 2013

2013-06-14T11:02:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 14 June 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[User:Xenon\|Xenon]]		[[User:Xenon\|Xenon]]



			What 'Askale' said is that SBS6314G was once a AMDEP 53 permer and he had seen it personally, though it only appeared on certain fixed BSEP timings allocated for Sv 53. It was later been appearing as cameo, though it was a stagnant permer of 53 under BSEP (it however, did not return to 53 quite often, as you mentioned).<BR>

			SBS6320M is a 29 permer.<br>

			--[[User:Apex-LW'21\|Apex-LW'21]] 19:02, 14 June 2013 (SGT)

Xenon: 6320M had depot change from BNDEP 29 to CGBP 29. And SBS6314G has never been perm AMDEP 53. Invalid crap will be removed from my user talk page as stated above

2013-06-11T02:44:57Z

6320M had depot change from BNDEP 29 to CGBP 29. And SBS6314G has never been perm AMDEP 53. Invalid crap will be removed from my user talk page as stated above

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:44, 11 June 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[User:Xenon\|Xenon]]		[[User:Xenon\|Xenon]]

	~~U never seen ur write. SBS 6320 M had still be sv 29...Pls see it...~~

	~~SBS 6314 G AMDEP 53---CGBP 20..Pls see it. U must be check yourself........~~

Askale at 14:55, 10 June 2013

2013-06-10T14:55:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:55, 10 June 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:

	U never seen ur write. SBS 6320 M had still be sv 29...Pls see it...		U never seen ur write. SBS 6320 M had still be sv 29...Pls see it...

			SBS 6314 G AMDEP 53---CGBP 20..Pls see it. U must be check yourself........

Askale at 14:50, 10 June 2013

2013-06-10T14:50:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:50, 10 June 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[User:Xenon\|Xenon]]		[[User:Xenon\|Xenon]]

			U never seen ur write. SBS 6320 M had still be sv 29...Pls see it...

Xenon at 11:14, 31 May 2013

2013-05-31T11:14:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:14, 31 May 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[User:Xenon\|Xenon]]		[[User:Xenon\|Xenon]]

	~~==SBS2687G==~~
	SBS2687G has a perm marking when I boarded it on Service 166. Boarded it on 30 April 2013 when I took the photo of it. Refer to: [[http://sgwiki.com/wiki/File:2687_perm_marking.JPG]] for evidence. Also, based on my spottings, even if SBS2687G does not perm BBDEP 166, it will also run around on other services such as Service 57, it is very rare to see JB-Striders on Service 160 and 170, though indeed true that they are JB-registered. Usually, DM3500s will be on the JB services instead, not Striders, though there are certain circumstances when all 4 of them appear on JB services.

	~~Hence, my thought is that SBS2687G is either BBDEP 166, or otherwise BBDEP SP. However, I can confirm that it does not perm BBDEP 170.~~

	~~[[User:Arthurjie\|Arthurjie]] 10:08, 12 May 2013 (SGT)~~

Arthurjie: /* SBS2687G */

2013-05-12T02:11:05Z

SBS2687G

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:11, 12 May 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:
	SBS2687G has a perm marking when I boarded it on Service 166. Boarded it on 30 April 2013 when I took the photo of it. Refer to: [[http://sgwiki.com/wiki/File:2687_perm_marking.JPG]] for evidence. Also, based on my spottings, even if SBS2687G does not perm BBDEP 166, it will also run around on other services such as Service 57, it is very rare to see JB-Striders on Service 160 and 170, though indeed true that they are JB-registered. Usually, DM3500s will be on the JB services instead, not Striders, though there are certain circumstances when all 4 of them appear on JB services.		SBS2687G has a perm marking when I boarded it on Service 166. Boarded it on 30 April 2013 when I took the photo of it. Refer to: [[http://sgwiki.com/wiki/File:2687_perm_marking.JPG]] for evidence. Also, based on my spottings, even if SBS2687G does not perm BBDEP 166, it will also run around on other services such as Service 57, it is very rare to see JB-Striders on Service 160 and 170, though indeed true that they are JB-registered. Usually, DM3500s will be on the JB services instead, not Striders, though there are certain circumstances when all 4 of them appear on JB services.

	Hence, my thought is that SBS2687G is BBDEP 166, otherwise BBDEP SP. However, I can confirm that it does not perm BBDEP 170.		Hence, my thought is that SBS2687G is either BBDEP 166, or otherwise BBDEP SP. However, I can confirm that it does not perm BBDEP 170.

	[[User:Arthurjie\|Arthurjie]] 10:08, 12 May 2013 (SGT)		[[User:Arthurjie\|Arthurjie]] 10:08, 12 May 2013 (SGT)