Difference between revisions of "User talk:ASA1234"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(27 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
Thank you.
Thank you.


==July 2014==
With effect 10 June 2014, all users will have to follow the following guidelines pertaining to the editing of pages in sgWiki.


As per guideline 1.4 —<br>
== Do not remove rego ranges where it exists ==
"1.4. When updating de-registered buses, they are to be updated after 2359 hours of the actual de-registration date of the bus. They are not allowed to be updated before the timing as the list will be reverted back if it is updated too early or before the stipulated time. '''For buses that are awaiting de-registration prior to de-registration, only reflect the status as "Awaiting de-registration" when there's confirmation based on the physical evidence."'''


This is due to your edit on 14 July 2014 for 5 deregistering buses of [[Mercedes-Benz O405G (Hispano MK1)]] which doesn't provide any reason via edit summary.
Hi ASA1234,


[[User:(SBS3107H)|<b><font color="red" size="3px">SBS</font><font color="purple" size="2px">3107H</font></b>]] ([[User talk:SBS3107H|<font face="Comic Sans MS"><font color="orange" size="2px">talk</font></font>]]) 21:48, 15 July 2014 (SGT)
It would be appreciated if you do not remove the rego ranges for the pages. These are there to provide a quick reference for the users, and also as a standardization across all companies.


Noted. But do take note that some of our senior bus fans such as 'lemon1974' in Sgforums have a better clearer view.. For my case of not indicating reasons, I would bear in mind. I did not personally went down to WLBP to see the 5 bendy buses there, while 'lemon1974' is the one who has spotted TIB502B TIB503Z TIB508K TIB849B TIB850X TIB851T TIB852R TIB853M being laid up in the respective bus parking spots days before de-registration dates. - ASA1234
--Scania 17:10, 3 September 2016 (SGT)
 
Saw your reply on my talk page, I still don't think that is a great idea as editors and users alike are already used to the rego ranges. Also, keep it separate from the company names as it will be untidy to put brackets in the company headings (the rego range sub-headings were there for this)
 
--Scania 19:38, 3 September 2016 (SGT)
 
==Re: 4 years' lifespan extension for certain Volvo B10M Mark IIs?==
Hello.
 
Thank you for letting me know about this matter. I have unlocked the requested page ([[Volvo B10M Mark II]]). Do update me when done!

Latest revision as of 21:24, 29 July 2019

Please do not remove this talk page without my permission.[edit]

I would wish to clarify that nothing is to be removed from my personal talk page, including the page itself by others without my permission. It is a wrongdoing as such as shown on [1]. If anyone is shown doing such things again I will have to deal with it according to guidelines.

Thank you.


Do not remove rego ranges where it exists[edit]

Hi ASA1234,

It would be appreciated if you do not remove the rego ranges for the pages. These are there to provide a quick reference for the users, and also as a standardization across all companies.

--Scania 17:10, 3 September 2016 (SGT)

Saw your reply on my talk page, I still don't think that is a great idea as editors and users alike are already used to the rego ranges. Also, keep it separate from the company names as it will be untidy to put brackets in the company headings (the rego range sub-headings were there for this)

--Scania 19:38, 3 September 2016 (SGT)

Re: 4 years' lifespan extension for certain Volvo B10M Mark IIs?[edit]

Hello.

Thank you for letting me know about this matter. I have unlocked the requested page (Volvo B10M Mark II). Do update me when done!