User talk:ASA1234

From SgWiki
Revision as of 12:38, 15 May 2014 by ASA1234 (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Please do not remove this talk page without my permission.

I would wish to clarify that nothing is to be removed from my personal talk page, including the page itself by others without my permission. It is a wrongdoing as such as shown on [1]. If anyone is shown doing such things again I will have to deal with it according to guidelines.

Thank you.


Hi, I just seen with interest that you have updated the Service Guide List with 52(31 Oct 2013), 5, 48, 57(all three 23 March 2014) and 142 (27 Apr 2014). I will like you to show me the photos of these five service guides that I have mention.

Lastly, there is a facebook group of Service Guides Lovers where collectors will post photos of new guides whenever they are found. I am not so sure if you have join or not of this facebook group. If you have join you can post the photos there.

Thanks

Janang1982

===========

Reply to Janang1982:

Greetings. Actually, I am 'Gus.chong' from Sgforums, and most of the true information are edited by me over the last two years. Previously I had borrowed a Facebook account by the name of 'Hexue Kerk’ which is the account you added into the group. However, some of the online friends of the original owner had been fed up and he informed me that I will have to stop using that account. Thereafter, I used another self-created account with a Chinese name (which has since changed to an English name Wind Kerk) to send you a request message to add me into the group, and indicated my identity as stated in the first line, but you did not do anything despite indications that you had read that message. If you add that account into the group, it would be easier for me to show the pictures.

I understand that there are misunderstandings because I placed the '138' in 31 July 2013 section of guides, in fact which is never existent at all. I would wish to clarify that that is a second-hand information I had gotten and nobody had corrected it before, thus resulting in the misunderstanding. But other than that, most other information I have edited are purely first-hand information.

Cheers.