Difference between revisions of "User talk:Themystery"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Re : Notes Section: new section)
(12 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Hi! If I have made any mistakes in any edit, please pardon me for my errors. I am open to any clarification for any matter if required.
Hi! If I have made any mistakes in any edit, please pardon me for my errors. I am open to any clarification for any matter if required.


==SBS8695T and Service 165==
== Re : Notes Section ==
Thanks for clarifying. So, any idea if it was really in BBDEP for a few months?
Also, I just saw SBS7679Y on a HG slot (16A, SBS7632G). Could you also help to look out for any changes in 165 buses’ depot control?


== Updep 198 deployments ==
Hi Themystery,


So far I spotted all updep 198 fleets.. all 6 buses r seen.. 7450 were out
Thank you for pointing out the error that I have made. Unfortunately I was sleepy and had forgotten to check through the notes that I have made.  


Based on my own observation, all 6 buses are seen.. only 7450 kena kicked out under new ett..
I have made the necessary steps to ensure this does not happen again and have made the changes accordingly.


And according to cfms.. SLBP side is only from sw307 onwards,, so last upd duty on wkdays is sw306.. hope u get the answer
Thank you.  


But for e n s parts.. i will check wit my bcf again
Regards,


Thks
SimonLim88
 
== Rwply updep 198 deployments part 2 ==
 
Hmm.. so far I do see all 6 buses in based on my own observation for past 2 wks. And all doing their respective perm slots..
 
Orginally was 7 den now 6 under new ett and 7450 was taken out.
 
Old ett was 6s and 1e
 
And now new ett is 4s and 2e???
Yes i did take note of ur reply.. but i will double check wit my bcf again.. thks
 
== Reply: SBS8939R ==
Hi.
 
Thanks for flagging this.
 
It is unsure whether these 5 KUBs are going to be operated by Strides as the converted bus retained the SBST colours instead of repainting to the COMET MAXI livery.
 
8939R is probably not for revenue use, hence stating it is appropriate to present its status on the non-revenue page although it retained its original registration number as of today.
 
We shall keep this in view for now.
 
Thank you.

Revision as of 22:56, 7 August 2020

Hi! If I have made any mistakes in any edit, please pardon me for my errors. I am open to any clarification for any matter if required.

Re : Notes Section

Hi Themystery,

Thank you for pointing out the error that I have made. Unfortunately I was sleepy and had forgotten to check through the notes that I have made.

I have made the necessary steps to ensure this does not happen again and have made the changes accordingly.

Thank you.

Regards,

SimonLim88