User talk:SBS3107H/Archive

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Batch 2 Citaros

Firstly, I want to say that I capitalise the words because I'm just kinda frustrated / pissed off that the newer bus fans have misunderstood the system to label statuses on Wiki, on more than one occasion. So if I have to add, I'm sorry for being too straightforward, but hope you see my point to just stick with the system.

Secondly, if you want a more detailed interpretation of the system, I posted in the page of Citaros in SGF. You'll know what I'm talking about after reading that post, and just don't read too much into my capitalised words, had to find a way to emphasise my point to not just you, but the countless other "newer" fans there cause they keep making the same mistake. Not shooting you directly too. My words can get very direct when trying to get my point across, hope you see what I'm talking about first.

I have to emphasise that this system of editing bus statuses on Wiki is to let others know which bus is out for revenue service on its first day of revenue service, not a matter of whether that bus is driven on the roads or not. Cause very simply, the bus has to be driven on the roads anyway for it to travel from C&C to the respective depots. But it will be weeks to even months before they're deployed on revenue service, either BSEP or non-BSEP.

Thirdly, nopes, the 66xx series as pointed out by 'service_238', is not under BSEP. The new BSEP ones will still be reg-ed under 63xx for now till it runs out I guess. Hope that clears the confusion. Peace & cheers. Hope you get what I'm talking about. Let me know through PM here or in SGF if you still need more clarification. I'll be glad to help, you just need to ask & you will be answered. Cheers.

7300P

Bro, can you elaborate why SBS7300P is Year 2002?

CDGEs were ordered in 28 Dec 2004. TIB1112L 27 Jan 2013, 15:43 (SGT)

Thanks for the explanation.

TIB1112L 27 Jan 2013, 19:18 (SGT)

SBS7485P

Sorry to bother you, help me clean it up. I will roll back the edits to where TIB1112L removed jumpbus to. I will deal with the cleaning up another time. What's your sgforums ID, PM me from there as well. Thanks.

SBS6342A - SBS6359C

As 6342A to 6359C are Batch 2 Citaros, why are they still listed under Batch 1?

SBS6301T 1 Feb 2013, 20:33 (SGT)

Read, thanks for clearing my doubts. SBS6301T 08:26, 2 Feb 2013 (SGT)

SBS3237R

Why should 3237R still be put as SP? There is already perm stix in the bus.SBS6301T 18:49, 6 Feb 2013 (SGT)

"3237 is still spare. It's been on 28 and 31 this week even though it keeps doing 88 replacing DD buses. It is still spare for now. It may enter 88 I future but please leave it as spare when it is spare now." - SBS9888Y aka SBS7485P on SGF. Link - http://sgforums.com/users/265154/posts#post_10779619 SBS3107H 20:15, 6 February 2013 (SGT)

The time when that was mentioned perm stix had not been seen yet. If its still SP what is perm stix there for? SBS6301T 21:47, 6 Feb 2013 (SGT)

SBS7485P 3237 is meant for 9166 , SV28 but still no sticker so I can't confirm, you must understand 88 had no other fleet addition recently other than 3210. Buses goes in only when there is outgoing buses.

SBS2656X I suggest we all just stop and observe as BRBP receives more DDs. The deployment for 88 is still too messy to sort out, with SBS3227U got 157 perm stix BUT still on 88 almost everyday, and SBS3186D, SBS3226Y, SBS3228S, SBS7500D, SBS7505E even if their ads are on or not, they all do 88. Just wait and observe.

Deployment Lists

Please also feel free to do a makeover for the rest of the deployment list of certain buses into table form, as some of the deployment list such as the Scania K230UB & the Mercedes-Benz O530 Citaro buses had not been changed yet.

--Apex-LW'21 23:11, 12 February 2013 (SGT)

MAN NL323F (BSEP Batch 2)

Greetings.

I would hope that you will understand that the latest MANs registered under the BSEP scheme (from SMB3035R onwards) should be classified under the Batch 2 consisting of 100 buses purchased by SMRT, as Batch 1 consists of only 200 buses. Please make the necessary edits when you see this topic.

Thank you.

Service 178

Can you explain to me why 178 fleet have 16 buses,not 15?

Jong Han 20:20, 28 March 2013 (SGT)

User Mdkbmi

I have reported this user to Apex Lw'21.

Jong Han 16:02, 12 April 2013 (SGT)

Noted. SBS3107H 16:06, 12 April 2013 (SGT)

TIB746P

Spotted on 188 ytd, and not under emergency pullover. So back to KJDEP.

TIB433S 09:42, 23 April 2013 (SGT)

Noted. SBS3107H 09:56, 23 April 2013 (SGT)

About 'maintenance' on pages

I don't really understand about your point of 'maintenance' when you make the edits on the two pages listing the de-registrations of buses, as I don't really see any difference in adding a space between. I would hope if you may elaborate on it. Thank you.

It was an automatic edit made by a Wikipedia script. The script / editing tool will do whatever maintenance / cleanup it need such as a space between the asterisk and the apostrophe. SBS3107H 20:31, 4 May 2013 (SGT)

TIB915T

So far TIB915T has been verified as a perm of 980/859* which replaces former perm TIB1002X. That is based on my observations in addition to other sources. Arthurjie 07:47, 7 May 2013 (SGT)

Noted. SBS3107H 08:09, 7 May 2013 (SGT)

WLBP

Both CGBP and WLBP are bus parks and have the same facilities but why are deployments put as CGBP 18 and WLDEP/WLBP 858? Shouldnt it be WLBP 858? SBS6301T 13:30, 12 May 2013

I have thought it before and if I changed it, some SMRT bus fans might not agree with it. So I will reconsider again. SBS3107H 14:34, 12 May 2013 (SGT)

ok thanks. to me WLBP without the WLDEP is more appropriate. SBS6301T 13:10 14 May 2013 (SGT)

Seems agreeable to me. SBS3107H 13:52, 14 May 2013 (SGT)

So can you change the deployment? SBS6301T 20:31, 16 May 2013 (SGT)

To be done soon by this month as the changeout is time-consuming. SBS3107H

Service 141

Hi, I think Service 141 should be in the category 141 - 160 instead of 123 - 140? Paramedic 14:13, 29 May 2013 (SGT)

Noted. SBS3107H 15:03, 29 May 2013 (SGT)

Former deployment of SMB275J (MAN A22 NL323F)

SMB275J was SP last time. I remembered very clearly.

Former deployment of SMB257L (MAN A22 NL323F)

SMB257L was SP last time, I remembered clearly and when I edit it in former deployments, someone keep removing it. Erwinlee95 18:56, 1 June 2013 (SGT)

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.