Difference between revisions of "User talk:SBS3107H"
(→Latest 184/858 deployments: new section) |
|||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Thanks and have a nice day | Thanks and have a nice day | ||
Never mind, it is okay. Well, all those deployments are confirmed by weeks. I will not anyhow edit unless all are confirmed. | |||
Revision as of 19:52, 8 August 2012
Good Evening,
That user SBS6078M that you had mentioned might have made a typo error. Supposingly, SBS7592M was redeployed over to 'SLBP 97', but he typed out as 'SLBP 9' as he is supposed to meant SLBP 97.
Anyways, do keep monitoring on his recent edits.
Apex-LW'21 20:45, 25 July 2012 (SGT)
Good Evening
Dear Admin SBS3107H,
Are you from the SGForum SBS3107H,it's me SBS6078M. Btw,the reason I've edited 'SLBP 9' is because I used my phone to edit that,and I was unable to add a '7' behind.Thus,I edited 'SLBP 9' , so that the people would change to 'SLBP 97'. As for the WABs,I did not edit all. I did all I can =)
Delivery of the 450 Citaro commenced today,SBS6300X spotted at C&C. By:SBS6078M
Latest 184/858 deployments
Hi, TIB772M user here.
Just to aware that SMB271U is currently 184 AP07 permer, which is redeployed from 858. Whereas SMB258J is no more doing 187 anymore, currently a SP bus. (In fact 258J only sch holiday permer for 187)
Hopefully this can clear the air.
Thanks and have a nice day
Never mind, it is okay. Well, all those deployments are confirmed by weeks. I will not anyhow edit unless all are confirmed.