Difference between revisions of "User talk:Alphabetlorefan1"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


==About Me==
==About Me==
Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond.
Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond. But wait, before you leave a message here, read this first:


== 858 DDs ==
#No spamming
#Be respectful to me
#Do not type any nonsense messages
#If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy


To correct you regarding your message on Haram's talk page, they are not cameos. There are indeed downroute DD slots from around Khatib & Sembawang stations that are performed by crossover buses with effect from this Monday.
Thanks


AirFan19
==Bus Service Pages==
 
== 190 SDs count ==
 
Based on my observation count on Sunday/PH, excluding interline/crossover buses from other routes(very likely for 190), SD count on Sun/PH seemingly tally up to 11 or near 11 during Peak hours. About 1-2 SD only perform PM. Thanks for helping to observe.
 
== Observation for Short Trip 975B ==
Hi, not sure do help to observe whether DDs on 975B on Sundays/PH is it from 975 or it run individually because based on observation, it seem to be their own bus. On PH I saw SMB3549A, SMB3614U and SMB5014M. Didn’t see them on 975 in the earlier part for the day at all.
 
Cheers!
 
==Re: Picture==
Hi,
Hi,


I solved it for you by converting it to png.
Just to inform you the following:
 
== Re:Important ==
 
Hi,
 
Just saw your message on my talk page. I would like to apologise for the harsh tone I spoke with.
 
However, I would also like to point out that I **CANNOT** update former deployments for deployments that are untrue. This is a count of vandalism and as you know yourself, sgWiki has some people who intentionally vandalise the page with untrue deployments.
 
Take SBS3921Z for an example, the bus has never been on the 117 roster and it was edited by an editor who never had reliable credibility. Hence, it brings out a question mark if the deployment was ever true. SBS3921Z has always been on 114 previously, but went into an MIA state, where it never left Hougang Depot. However, it is still rostered under 114 even when it was no longer seen on 114, hence, I did not make the change from 117. Because if I were to declare it on another service or a spare bus, it would be incorrect too, because on the timetable schedule, SBS3921Z is still under 114, but in reality, HGDEP deploys a random DD on that slot, mainly SBS3826R.
 
I would also like to point out that I also do update former deployments for buses that are only true and rostered by the affected bus operator, please see the edit below for proof:
 
https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Former_Deployments_of_Volvo_B9TL_(Wright_Eclipse_Gemini_2)_(Batch_1)&diff=prev&oldid=619602
 
You undid many edits of mine in the past, mostly due to former deployments. There is a reason why it was not followed, if not the liability would be on me, as I am the one who made the most recent change. I do also notice you tend to speak in a bossy tone, which I took offence to but merely kept quiet. I also would like to clear some information based on the remarks of this edit:
 
https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=MAN_NL323F_(Euro_VI)&diff=prev&oldid=604294
 
I don’t owe you a living nor do you need to stroke your boss-like ego by saying “I'm not accepting this edit until you have updated the former deployments”. I don’t answer to you, you’re not anyone close to me, you’re just a random stranger on the internet.
 
Also, if you want to take this up to the admins, I have nothing to say. But I hope that admins can also see my point of view here.
 
Thanks for reading.
 
Regards,
Haram


== Re: User:SMN4840M ==
{| class='wikitable' style='text-align:center;'
|+
!style='{{CSS/BUS|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Depot
!style='{{CSS/BUS|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Fleet Size
!colspan=3 style='{{CSS/BUS|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Fleet
|-
!rowspan=2 style='{{CSS/BUS|bgop=c0|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Depot
|rowspan=2|''The fleet size''
!''(Number of Single Deckers buses based on fleet size)'' Single Deckers
!''(Number of Double Deckers buses based on fleet size)'' Double Deckers
!''(Number of Articulated buses based on fleet size)'' Articulated
|-
|
''List of all perm bus and possible models for flexi deployment/random''
|
''List of all perm bus and possible models for flexi deployment/random''
|
''List of all perm bus and possible models for flexi deployment/random''
|}


Thanks for updating me on this. It is quite clearly not my account as I have only ever used this account and I do not even edit such things which are okay in the first place. Furthermore, the admin has already banned these accounts made by the same person so it should be fine now.
As such, it was no longer a need to count or update the bus count numbering anymore, just need to ensure the fleet size adds up to the total fleet size. I hope this changes will make it easier for editor to update.


Thanks,<br>
Secondly, for the template <nowiki>{{Bus/xx|a=y}}</nowiki> is the same as <nowiki>{{Bus/xx|a=y|l=xxy}}</nowiki> if xxy is a supplementry or express service (Only use the l= parameters for SWT).
LTA Bus Irrationalisation


== 184 and 302 bendy buses ==
==Concern regarding SBS6709B on routes 129 and 293==


Hi, do help to KIV if 184 and 302 bendy buses that are still interchangeable. Also I have seen some 176 perm buses running on 190 often/some days. Need help to observe if its still interchangeable thanks.
I edited the page because someone informed me that he was in a Discord server where a user once claimed that SBS6709B was always seen on route 129 instead of route 293, and that they take route 129 everyday.


RobloxXF
Please check again on your edits. Thanks. GyecheonSageori (aka Gye) ([[User Talk:GyecheonSageori|talk,]]) 14:15, 31 December 2024 (+08)

Latest revision as of 14:15, 31 December 2024

!
 Warning Point (19 April 2024)
!
You have committed the follow offense that may warrant an immediate ban: False Information (Cameo into Service 167)

Including the clause that states Any "Double Decker" Bus to Service 167 where DD is Cameo and not perm.

About Me[edit]

Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond. But wait, before you leave a message here, read this first:

  1. No spamming
  2. Be respectful to me
  3. Do not type any nonsense messages
  4. If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy

Thanks

Bus Service Pages[edit]

Hi,

Just to inform you the following:

Depot Fleet Size Fleet
Depot The fleet size (Number of Single Deckers buses based on fleet size) Single Deckers (Number of Double Deckers buses based on fleet size) Double Deckers (Number of Articulated buses based on fleet size) Articulated

List of all perm bus and possible models for flexi deployment/random

List of all perm bus and possible models for flexi deployment/random

List of all perm bus and possible models for flexi deployment/random

As such, it was no longer a need to count or update the bus count numbering anymore, just need to ensure the fleet size adds up to the total fleet size. I hope this changes will make it easier for editor to update.

Secondly, for the template {{Bus/xx|a=y}} is the same as {{Bus/xx|a=y|l=xxy}} if xxy is a supplementry or express service (Only use the l= parameters for SWT).

Concern regarding SBS6709B on routes 129 and 293[edit]

I edited the page because someone informed me that he was in a Discord server where a user once claimed that SBS6709B was always seen on route 129 instead of route 293, and that they take route 129 everyday.

Please check again on your edits. Thanks. GyecheonSageori (aka Gye) (talk,) 14:15, 31 December 2024 (+08)

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Alphabetlorefan1&oldid=648663"