Difference between revisions of "User talk:CastJared"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Undo revision 659571 by ZBK Volgren (talk))
Tag: Undo
(→‎Talking to me?: new section)
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Opinion==
==Re:Elkie Tee==
Hi,
I had permenant ban the user for his inappropriate rage, and directed anger. Regarding his recent edit on ADL 3 Doors and SG6361G, please verify if what he claimed is true. The earlier undos that I made is fully because of failure to update former deployment. However in this case, the user did fully update on all part, which you had reverted with deny and an edit warring warning. I had no idea on the spotting, so I can't gave comment if that edit is consider vandalism/false information, hence no warning point is made.


Thank you for sharing your feedback on the proposed changes earlier. I am pleased to inform you that the bus spotting page has been launched, which I believe will assist editors in verifying deployment accuracy and enhancing the reliability of current deployment information.
== Replace an image thats not watermark on bus model pages ==


To address concerns regarding potential false entries on the spotting page, I trust in the integrity of our editors to avoid posting hypothetical or inaccurate information. Additionally, I have implemented features such as Date/Time stamps and Editor attribution to reinforce accountability.
Hi, good to see your edit replacing one of the image without LTG watermark on a bus model page, if you see more, replace ASAP, and also in the Bus Deployments page thanks.


Regarding the subpages, I have launched the following: [[Scania K230UB (Euro IV) (Batch 2)]]. Deployment details have been transferred to the respective subpages.
=== Another message ===


As a trial, I finalised the layout for the first subpage: [[Scania K230UB (Euro IV) (Batch 2)/1]], incorporating your valuable feedback.
Hi, do you mind to find an image of 16M, 33 and 84G without watermark? Feel free to reply


Please confirm if the following criteria are met:
Not sure how to get that image.
# Clear visibility and usability on mobile devices.
# Ease of information references.


If you have additional suggestions for improving the subpage layout, please do not hesitate to share your input. Thank you for your time and constructive feedback.
I will tell you how you can get it: I suggest you go outside, look out for the service that I mentioned and to take picture, but has to be at a perfect angle. Flickr images, I think crediting might be impossible idk


Regards, Supernutorcrazy
== Talking to me? ==


== Undo of Edits ==
I am confused as what you wrote [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Sgbusntrain&diff=673954&oldid=673953 here] because of the image uploaded in the talk page. You are talking to me, or Sgbusntrain that one guy who uploaded files without due notice. Just reply if I get into any mistaken notice
Hi,
 
I had undo your edit on [[Bus Deployments by Service]], as I do not want to be flamed by critics for implementing disorientation into this page for the following:
 
1. Feeder service
 
* Choa Chu Kang: {{Bus/300}} {{Bus/301}} {{Bus/302}} {{Bus/307}}
 
This make it looks like there is two seperate town called "Choa Chu Kang". That is the reason why it will only be reflected when ALL pages is converted in it.
 
2. Express service
 
* Express: {{Bus/10|a=e}} {{Bus/12|a=e}} {{Bus/14|a=e}} {{Bus/30|a=e}} {{Bus/43|a=e}} {{Bus/89|a=e}} {{Bus/97|a=e}} {{Bus/174|a=e}} {{Bus/188|a=e}} {{Bus/196|a=e}} {{Bus/502}} {{Bus/502|a=A}} {{Bus/851|a=e}} {{Bus/868|a=E}} {{Bus/951|a=E}} {{Bus/960|a=e}} {{Bus/982|a=E}}
* [[Express Services 502 - 982E#Express 506|Express Services 506 - 963e]]
 
This at a glance is nothing wrong, but person with OCD will criticised me for saying, why the service numbering is not in order.
 
I hope you understand the rationale behind my undo.
 
Regards
 
===Merging of Euro Emission & Batches===
Hi,
 
Do you think we should merge the Euro Emission and Batches as we moves to subpage. This make it easier to link from Deployment by service pages back to model, and bus community will find it easier to find/track a bus rather than remembering the batches.
 
So it will be like this:
 
{|class='wikitable sortable'
!style='{{CSS/BUS|xfc=|xbc=|bgop=a0}}' width=10%|Registration no.
!style='{{CSS/BUS|xfc=|xbc=|bgop=a0}}' width=10%|Deployment
!style='{{CSS/BUS|xfc=|xbc=|bgop=a0}}' width=10%|Batches (Optional Column)
!class=unsortable style='{{CSS/BUS|xfc=|xbc=|bgop=a0}}text-align:center' width=40%|Advertisement
!class=unsortable style='{{CSS/BUS|xfc=|xbc=|bgop=a0}}text-align:center' width=40%|Former Deployments
|}
 
Bodywork differences such as Volvo B9TL CDGE/WEG/Gemilang will not be affected, similiarily to 2D/3D variants.
 
== Advisory on Bus Services with missing route information boxes ==
 
Hi,
 
In consideration of the errors, discrepancies and inconsistencies that I myself and the editors make, I would like to advise not to certify a new service page as "complete" if there is a missing route information box.  
 
Hope to seek your understanding as we seek to implement quality control in this project.
 
Thanks and Regards
 
== Mandatory cleanup ==
 
I did cleanup Blanked pages by reverting it. But only those that got messed up are cleaning up the edits done by editors who commit Vandalism.

Latest revision as of 23:02, 21 March 2025

Re:Elkie Tee[edit]

I had permenant ban the user for his inappropriate rage, and directed anger. Regarding his recent edit on ADL 3 Doors and SG6361G, please verify if what he claimed is true. The earlier undos that I made is fully because of failure to update former deployment. However in this case, the user did fully update on all part, which you had reverted with deny and an edit warring warning. I had no idea on the spotting, so I can't gave comment if that edit is consider vandalism/false information, hence no warning point is made.

Replace an image thats not watermark on bus model pages[edit]

Hi, good to see your edit replacing one of the image without LTG watermark on a bus model page, if you see more, replace ASAP, and also in the Bus Deployments page thanks.

Another message[edit]

Hi, do you mind to find an image of 16M, 33 and 84G without watermark? Feel free to reply

Not sure how to get that image.

I will tell you how you can get it: I suggest you go outside, look out for the service that I mentioned and to take picture, but has to be at a perfect angle. Flickr images, I think crediting might be impossible idk

Talking to me?[edit]

I am confused as what you wrote here because of the image uploaded in the talk page. You are talking to me, or Sgbusntrain that one guy who uploaded files without due notice. Just reply if I get into any mistaken notice

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:CastJared&oldid=673962"