Difference between revisions of "User talk:Alphabetlorefan1"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Re: User:SMN4840M: new section)
(52 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Warning Point|19 April 2024|False Information (Cameo into Service 167)
Including the clause that states Any "Double Decker" Bus to Service 167 where DD is Cameo and not perm.}}
==About Me==
==About Me==
Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond.
Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond. But wait, before you leave a message here, read this first:
 
== 858 DDs ==
 
To correct you regarding your message on Haram's talk page, they are not cameos. There are indeed downroute DD slots from around Khatib & Sembawang stations that are performed by crossover buses with effect from this Monday.
 
AirFan19
 
== 190 SDs count ==


Based on my observation count on Sunday/PH, excluding interline/crossover buses from other routes(very likely for 190), SD count on Sun/PH seemingly tally up to 11 or near 11 during Peak hours. About 1-2 SD only perform PM. Thanks for helping to observe.
#No spamming
#Be respectful to me
#Do not type any nonsense messages
#If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
#Don't troll me


== Observation for Short Trip 975B ==
Thanks
Hi, not sure do help to observe whether DDs on 975B on Sundays/PH is it from 975 or it run individually because based on observation, it seem to be their own bus. On PH I saw SMB3549A, SMB3614U and SMB5014M. Didn’t see them on 975 in the earlier part for the day at all.


Cheers!
== Re: Evaluation on 117/M ==


==Re: Picture==
Hi Alphabetlorefan1,
Hi,


I solved it for you by converting it to png.
Would like to approach you for an evaluation on the possibility of creating 117/M under one single page, as you have expressed interest in completing 117/M.


== Re:Important ==
As 117A is running during 117M operating hours but counted as a short-trip service under 117, there may be an instance of confusion, given that 117 starts later on paper. Furthermore, 117 and 117M's only difference is in Seletar, in which both routes may not see any long-term amendments other than Seletar. Hence, the table below attempts to address the difference with alternate operating hours by the parent route and route variant under one combined page.


Hi,
I am currently also waiting for admin's response before I proceed to create other services that fall under the same example with 117/M. Do share your opinions and thoughts on the idea. Thanks.


Just saw your message on my talk page. I would like to apologise for the harsh tone I spoke with.
{| class='wikitable' style='text-align:center;'
!Departure Period<br>(Weekdays)
!Service Available
!Passing through
|-
|<font size=3>05:30 – 08:00</font>
|<font size=5>'''117M'''</font>
|style='text-align:left;'|
* West Camp Road
* '''Seletar Aerospace Crescent'''
* '''Seletar Aerospace Link'''
* Seletar Aerospace Drive
|-
|<font size=3>08:15 – 16:50</font>
|<font size=5>'''117'''</font>
|style='text-align:left;'|
* West Camp Road
* Seletar Aerospace Drive
|-
|<font size=3>17:00 – 19:00</font>
|<font size=5>'''117M'''</font>
|style='text-align:left;'|
* West Camp Road
* '''Seletar Aerospace Crescent '''
* '''Seletar Aerospace Link'''
* Seletar Aerospace Drive
|-
|<font size=3>19:15 – 23:30</font>
|<font size=5>'''117'''</font>
|style='text-align:left;'|
* West Camp Road
* Seletar Aerospace Drive
|}


However, I would also like to point out that I **CANNOT** update former deployments for deployments that are untrue. This is a count of vandalism and as you know yourself, sgWiki has some people who intentionally vandalise the page with untrue deployments.
<div class="mw-collapsible">
<p class='exc'>[Show/Hide Full Route Details]</p>
{| class="wikitable"
!rowspan=2 style='{{CSS/BUS|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Bus Stops
!rowspan=2 style='{{CSS/BUS|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Point of Interest
!colspan=2 style='{{CSS/BUS|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Weekdays
!colspan=2 style='{{CSS/BUS|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Saturdays
!colspan=2 style='{{CSS/BUS|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Suns / PHs
|-
!style='{{CSS/LTA|xfc=|xbc=}}'|First bus!!style='{{CSS/LTA|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Last bus
!style='{{CSS/LTA|xfc=|xbc=}}'|First bus!!style='{{CSS/LTA|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Last bus
!style='{{CSS/LTA|xfc=|xbc=}}'|First bus!!style='{{CSS/LTA|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Last bus
|-
|{{BS68181|swt=<br><font size=3>'''<center>({{Bus/117|a=M}} only)</center>'''</font>}}
{{Bus/FBLB|05:50/08:23<br>(117M)|17:24/19:23<br>(117M)|sa=|su=|fr=}}
|colspan=4 {{N/A}}
|}


Take SBS3921Z for an example, the bus has never been on the 117 roster and it was edited by an editor who never had reliable credibility. Hence, it brings out a question mark if the deployment was ever true. SBS3921Z has always been on 114 previously, but went into an MIA state, where it never left Hougang Depot. However, it is still rostered under 114 even when it was no longer seen on 114, hence, I did not make the change from 117. Because if I were to declare it on another service or a spare bus, it would be incorrect too, because on the timetable schedule, SBS3921Z is still under 114, but in reality, HGDEP deploys a random DD on that slot, mainly SBS3826R.
===Update===
Good afternoon Alphabetlorefan1,


I would also like to point out that I also do update former deployments for buses that are only true and rostered by the affected bus operator, please see the edit below for proof:
The admin has given his reply that it is possible to create 117/M under one single page. The 117/M page creation will be yours as usual. If you wish to discuss this further, do let me know.


https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Former_Deployments_of_Volvo_B9TL_(Wright_Eclipse_Gemini_2)_(Batch_1)&diff=prev&oldid=619602
Thank you.


You undid many edits of mine in the past, mostly due to former deployments. There is a reason why it was not followed, if not the liability would be on me, as I am the one who made the most recent change. I do also notice you tend to speak in a bossy tone, which I took offence to but merely kept quiet. I also would like to clear some information based on the remarks of this edit:
== Lets sum this up ==


https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=MAN_NL323F_(Euro_VI)&diff=prev&oldid=604294
Good to see you having a batch of images you uploaded. But due to some reasons, you have to be aware of something because one of them told me everything in my talk page.


I don’t owe you a living nor do you need to stroke your boss-like ego by saying “I'm not accepting this edit until you have updated the former deployments”. I don’t answer to you, you’re not anyone close to me, you’re just a random stranger on the internet.
With this, we recommend you to read this: https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/CA2021 and https://support.google.com/legal/answer/3463239?hl=en


Also, if you want to take this up to the admins, I have nothing to say. But I hope that admins can also see my point of view here.
Before you can proceed off, ah my brain feels relaxed


Thanks for reading.
== Re: Bus Service Page creation ==


Regards,
Good evening Alphabetlorefan1,
Haram


== Re: User:SMN4840M ==
Noted your remarks, I can understand where you are coming from. I will proceed with 179/A when I feel the time is right.


Thanks for updating me on this. It is quite clearly not my account as I have only ever used this account and I do not even edit such things which are okay in the first place. Furthermore, the admin has already banned these accounts made by the same person so it should be fine now.
In addition, I also plan to take on some of the remaining services that you have announced that you will take over, I now have lesser free time, I feel that it is time to speed up the processes and focus more on page maintenance thereafter. Will that be fine with you as well?


Thanks,<br>
Thanks
LTA Bus Irrationalisation

Revision as of 18:49, 30 March 2025

About Me

Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond. But wait, before you leave a message here, read this first:

  1. No spamming
  2. Be respectful to me
  3. Do not type any nonsense messages
  4. If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
  5. Don't troll me

Thanks

Re: Evaluation on 117/M

Hi Alphabetlorefan1,

Would like to approach you for an evaluation on the possibility of creating 117/M under one single page, as you have expressed interest in completing 117/M.

As 117A is running during 117M operating hours but counted as a short-trip service under 117, there may be an instance of confusion, given that 117 starts later on paper. Furthermore, 117 and 117M's only difference is in Seletar, in which both routes may not see any long-term amendments other than Seletar. Hence, the table below attempts to address the difference with alternate operating hours by the parent route and route variant under one combined page.

I am currently also waiting for admin's response before I proceed to create other services that fall under the same example with 117/M. Do share your opinions and thoughts on the idea. Thanks.

Departure Period
(Weekdays) 		Service Available Passing through
05:30 – 08:00 117M
  • West Camp Road
  • Seletar Aerospace Crescent
  • Seletar Aerospace Link
  • Seletar Aerospace Drive
08:15 – 16:50 117
  • West Camp Road
  • Seletar Aerospace Drive
17:00 – 19:00 117M
  • West Camp Road
  • Seletar Aerospace Crescent
  • Seletar Aerospace Link
  • Seletar Aerospace Drive
19:15 – 23:30 117
  • West Camp Road
  • Seletar Aerospace Drive
Collapse

[Show/Hide Full Route Details]

Bus Stops Point of Interest Weekdays Saturdays Suns / PHs
First bus Last bus First bus Last bus First bus Last bus
icon
68181
Bef JTC Aerospace
Seletar A'space Lk

(117M only)
 05:50/08:23
(117M)		17:24/19:23
(117M)		 N/A

Update

Good afternoon Alphabetlorefan1,

The admin has given his reply that it is possible to create 117/M under one single page. The 117/M page creation will be yours as usual. If you wish to discuss this further, do let me know.

Thank you.

Lets sum this up

Good to see you having a batch of images you uploaded. But due to some reasons, you have to be aware of something because one of them told me everything in my talk page.

With this, we recommend you to read this: https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/CA2021 and https://support.google.com/legal/answer/3463239?hl=en

Before you can proceed off, ah my brain feels relaxed

Re: Bus Service Page creation

Good evening Alphabetlorefan1,

Noted your remarks, I can understand where you are coming from. I will proceed with 179/A when I feel the time is right.

In addition, I also plan to take on some of the remaining services that you have announced that you will take over, I now have lesser free time, I feel that it is time to speed up the processes and focus more on page maintenance thereafter. Will that be fine with you as well?

Thanks

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Alphabetlorefan1&oldid=676299"