Difference between revisions of "User talk:CastJared"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Undo revision 672371 by CastJared (talk) VERY FUCKING LUO LI LUO SUO)
m
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Stop undoing edits to my talk page. ==
==Amended vs Extended==
Hi,


I have read your edits to my talk page, can you please stop undoing them FFS? I get really annoyed if you revert edits to my talk page and I have already mentioned in the edit summary that I have read and understood them.
You’re right that "extended" is generally preferable to "amended", as it provides clearer context—such as in the case of Service 110, where the extension to Compassvale in Sengkang makes sense and reflects the move towards Buangkok.


== Controversial edit on Alexander Dennis Enviro500 3-Door ==
However, for Service 114, I believe "amended" is the more appropriate term. The previous starting point was Buangkok MRT, which is located just outside Buangkok ITH. So, while there is technically an extension, the route itself hasn’t changed significantly—the overall profile remains the same. Hence, "amended" better captures the nature of the change in this instance.


Please do not introduce controversial material into articles without first discussing it on the article's talk page. Your edits may appear to some to be vandalism and disruptive, and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.
If you had noticed, I've begun updating the history by using "amended" for relocations to the same xxx Temp/ITH/Int, to better reflect that it's still the same interchange—since the bus stop code hasn't changed. This is in contrast to the previous phrasing, which used "amended to xxx Temp Int/Int/ITH" and implied a change of interchange, which isn’t actually the case.


Regards,
Regards


== Edit warring ==
[[User:Supernutorcrazy|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy|talk]]) 10:19, 18 April 2025 (+08)
 
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
 
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
 
CastJared, add in something about edit war.
 
See there:
 
An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions. Editors engaged in a dispute should reach consensus or pursue dispute resolution rather than edit war. Edit warring is unconstructive, creates animosity between editors, makes consensus harder to reach, and causes confusion for readers. Users who engage in edit warring risk being blocked or even banned. An editor who repeatedly restores their preferred version is edit warring, regardless of whether those edits are justifiable. Claiming "My edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is not a valid defense.
 
There is a bright line known as the three-revert rule (3RR). To revert is to undo the action of another editor. The three-revert rule states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material, on a single page within a 24-hour period. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside of the 24-hour slot will usually be considered edit warring. There are certain exemptions to the three-revert rule, such as reverting vandalism or clear violations of the policy on biographies of living persons; see below for details. The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly; it is not a definition of "edit warring", and it is absolutely possible to engage in edit warring without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so.

Latest revision as of 10:19, 18 April 2025

Amended vs Extended[edit]

Hi,

You’re right that "extended" is generally preferable to "amended", as it provides clearer context—such as in the case of Service 110, where the extension to Compassvale in Sengkang makes sense and reflects the move towards Buangkok.

However, for Service 114, I believe "amended" is the more appropriate term. The previous starting point was Buangkok MRT, which is located just outside Buangkok ITH. So, while there is technically an extension, the route itself hasn’t changed significantly—the overall profile remains the same. Hence, "amended" better captures the nature of the change in this instance.

If you had noticed, I've begun updating the history by using "amended" for relocations to the same xxx Temp/ITH/Int, to better reflect that it's still the same interchange—since the bus stop code hasn't changed. This is in contrast to the previous phrasing, which used "amended to xxx Temp Int/Int/ITH" and implied a change of interchange, which isn’t actually the case.

Regards

Supernutorcrazy (talk) 10:19, 18 April 2025 (+08)

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:CastJared&oldid=683371"