Difference between revisions of "User talk:SBS3107H"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The page to clarify any enquiries.
(reply) |
(Reply :)) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: It will be tedious to do it which probably better to leave it aside. For future bus fleet, the usage of <nowiki><sup>E</sup></nowiki> is unneeded. [[User:(SBS3107H)|<b><font color="red" size="3px">SBS</font><font color="purple" size="2px">3107H</font></b>]] ([[User talk:SBS3107H|<font face="Courier"><font color="green" size="2px">talk</font></font>]]) 21:54, 11 November 2013 (SGT) | : It will be tedious to do it which probably better to leave it aside. For future bus fleet, the usage of <nowiki><sup>E</sup></nowiki> is unneeded. [[User:(SBS3107H)|<b><font color="red" size="3px">SBS</font><font color="purple" size="2px">3107H</font></b>]] ([[User talk:SBS3107H|<font face="Courier"><font color="green" size="2px">talk</font></font>]]) 21:54, 11 November 2013 (SGT) | ||
-So can I start with SBST Citaro and SMRT MAN A22 pages? | |||
[[User:SMB1341U|SMB1341U]] ([[User talk:SMB1341U|talk]]) 22:44, 11 November 2013 (SGT) | |||
Revision as of 22:45, 11 November 2013
Just to ask, can "Buses with new EZ-Link card readers" be removed from some pages? Because nowadays most buses have the new ones, and if there's any old EZ-Link card readers out there, how about using # as an indication? I don't mind if you don't agree with me :D
SMB1341U (talk) 20:20, 11 November 2013 (SGT)
- It will be tedious to do it which probably better to leave it aside. For future bus fleet, the usage of <sup>E</sup> is unneeded. SBS3107H (talk) 21:54, 11 November 2013 (SGT)
-So can I start with SBST Citaro and SMRT MAN A22 pages? SMB1341U (talk) 22:44, 11 November 2013 (SGT)