User talk:23ispolo: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{|class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" | {|class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" | ||
!colspan="3"|Click to expand/collapse | !colspan="3"|Click to expand/collapse | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="2"|'''BNDEP''' | |colspan="2"|'''BNDEP''' | ||
| Line 23: | Line 16: | ||
'''SG6178U SG6185Z'''<br>MAN ND323F<br> | '''SG6178U SG6185Z'''<br>MAN ND323F<br> | ||
'''SBS3118B SBS3697X SBS7665L SG5144Z'''<br>Volvo B9TL<br> | '''SBS3118B SBS3697X SBS7665L SG5144Z'''<br>Volvo B9TL<br> | ||
|- | |||
|colspan="2"|'''HGDEP''' | |||
| | |||
'''SBS6158R'''<br>Mercedes-Benz O530 Citaro<br> | |||
'''SBS5038K SBS8181J SBS8293U SBS8788J SBS8826H SBS8865U SBS8970Z'''<br>Scania K230UB<br> | |||
'''SG5841U SG5957U SG5958S SG5991U SG5992S SG5993P'''<br>MAN ND323F<br> | |||
'''SBS3658J SBS3814A SBS7662U'''<br>Volvo B9TL<br> | |||
|- | |- | ||
|rowspan="2"|'''UPDEP''' | |rowspan="2"|'''UPDEP''' | ||
Revision as of 02:49, 18 February 2025
UPD decals
UPD stickers are gradually coming back. You mind listing what you see here then
Reply (23ispolo):
This table presents buses with UPD stickers based on cross-checking the regos with my memory, other than some unconfirmed buses from 145 (i.e. SBS5030G, SBS6222M & SBS8297J). There may still be buses that are not 145 perm anymore, but still have the white UPD sticker. Moreover, some UPDEP buses do not have either blue or white UPD stickers (e.g. SBS8770J & SG5544C), or have a plain blue sticker (which I did not include here). Otherwise, this should be accurate unless I missed out regos by accident.
Buses with "UPD" windscreen sticker
| Click to expand/collapse | ||
|---|---|---|
| BNDEP |
SBS6075X SBS6121X SBS6139X SBS6192R SBS6193M SG1227U | |
| HGDEP |
SBS6158R | |
| UPDEP | UPD
|
SMB3038H SMB3040A SMB3042U SMB3043S SMB3052R SG1705G SG1709X SG1710R SG1711M SG1714E SG1715E SG1716A SG1721J SG1722G SG1749E SG1857B SG1859X SG1860R SG1862K SG1863H SG1864E SG1865C SG1866A SG1867Y SG1868U SG1882C SG1883A |
UPD
|
SBS6033S SBS6034P SBS6043M SBS6044K SBS6049Y SBS6050S SBS6072D SBS6091Z SBS6099C SBS6136D SBS6224H SBS6271X SBS6387X SBS6633K SBS6644D SBS6654A SBS6668K SBS6669H SBS6693L SBS6700A SBS6719Y SBS6734C SBS6736Y SBS6744Z SBS6762X SBS6781R SBS6838L SBS6863M SG1166L | |
SMRT bus duties, 176
How can I add in a box for individual SMRT bus duties of dual-depot services, like 176? --23ispolo (talk) 22:23, 31 May 2014 (SGT)
I have added two tables under Service 176 section. Do add in the duty codes too. Thank you.
SMB1341U (talk) 14:20 31/05/2014 (SGT)
Thank you. However, I need to confirm some of the slots of the buses, like SMB1400H - SMB1402C and TIB544E. So, I will leave their duties under 'TBC', before I confirm their actual slots. But great thanks for your help! :)--23ispolo (talk) 22:32, 1 June 2014 (SGT)
Hi 23ispolo, do note that when you add in new box under a service, do check to see if the box fits well like utilising the space if needed to put into two rows rather than putting it all into one single box. As some buses have many slots, the shifts gets rather confusing with the bus under the slot. Leaving a huge colspan dash - for the saturdays and sundays is rather not necessary.
And also check to see if the box is okay if you do happen to use a mobile to access the particular service you have created a box for. As for some of the edits Ive done, Ive ensured that the box does not overflow out of the sgwiki page for that service as I was told from wikipedia. Cheers and good day!
UPDEP 80 DDs
Hi 23ispolo,
It would be great if we had a way to mark standby buses in the roster, as currently now SBST and SMRT adopted this strategy of keeping a spare fleet, by using extra buses from other services. Whether my edits are true or not, my edits are according to the buses being marked in the schedule, as well as the fleet assigned to them.
Of course day to day deployments will vary everyday, I highly suspect that some SBST depots might be moving into the TTS deployment strategy, where the roster is not followed at all and any buses can be deployed. (AMDEP I’m looking at you)
Overall, just trying to help the community with the insider information I have. Of course some fanboys of a particular service (cough cough Service 190) can’t take the changes and just undid my edits. :(
Thanks for reading.
Regards,
Haram
BRBP Bus schedules
Hi 23ispolo
Where do you find duty table for Service 31? What about other services?
Regards,
BOG
RE: HGDEP buses parking in Sengkang West Depot
Hi there, SBS3720L here.
Understood there are buses like SBS3053D, SG5325T with RED stickers but from Services that are non sengkang-hougang.
As far as I heard, re-deployment of buses are expected.
Based on what I see thus far, seems to support the re-deployment theory, as:
- 6079K (64 bus) - On 159
- 6090B, 6147Y, 6237X (109/315 buses) - Spotted 2 consequetive days on 27
- 8119R (315 bus) - On 151
Will have to see in the coming Weekdays if that holds true, as the stickers were first spotted Saturday morning on various hougang int services (21 Dec)
Update: - Seems like clementi package buses are also being moved to Sengkang west, as seen with 6190X (156) and 3057T (147) currently. Although they are currently a mixture of red and non red tags. - 27 & possibly 329 moved to full sengkang west w.e.f tdy, as all deployed buses carries red tag. Only can confirm 30 of the 35 buses currently. Can only be denoted when extremely sure there are non red tag buses deployed on them. - Services like 102, 107, 112, 153, 161, 165, 325 are still doing dual deployment.
Cheers!
190 deployment
Hi hi,
Those E500 you mention are still on 190 on a regular basis. In fact, 190 and 176 DDs are interchangeable and 184 nowadays run flexi so it is common in place for random E500 cameo 184.
5026D was assign to a perm slot and part of 190 roster saw for 4 continuous day this week; 5032K rotate 190 and 176.
As for the SDs, yup indeed 1638P unperm 190 since 18 December 2024. 84T should be still 190 perm as very commonplace for 176 and 190 OCs to run 985. As for the GB sticker you mention, not sure but recently buses that cameo 190 have a lot, in particular SMB234C have been on same slot so could be a swap over.
Opinion
Hi,
I would like to seek your opinion on the following proposed changes:
1. Launch of sgWiki Bus Spotting Page A new page will be created daily and automatically deleted a month later. For example, "Bus Spotting/1 February 2025" would be removed on 1 March 2025. This page is intended to allow editors to document bus registration numbers without the typical edit limitations, enabling infinite edits.
The primary objective is to encourage collaboration among editors and to improve the accuracy of bus deployment data in relation to their permanent services. Many users have noted that the deployment page contains inaccurate and outdated information. By using these pages, we aim to track bus operations more effectively and allocate the correct permanent services, without requiring editors to board the buses to verify duty schedules.
2. Use of Subpages for Bus Model Deployment I have received considerable feedback, mostly criticism, regarding the separation and consolidation of bus advertisements across models. Most complaints focus on advertisement changes rather than deployment accuracy, which contributes to the aforementioned inaccuracies. As such, I propose reorganising the Bus Model deployment using subpages as follows:
Example: Volvo B9TL (WEG Batch 2) will be divided into four subpages:
- Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 1 – (Low Entry, SBS7700T – SBS7729L)
- Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 2 – (Low Floor, SBS3000G – SBS3099Y)
- Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 3 – (Low Floor, SBS3100B – SBS3199S)
- Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 4 – (Low Floor, SBS3200X – SBS3238M & SBS3269Z)
A navigation bar will be added at the top and bottom of each page, linking the respective subpages. Each page will feature a single table listing up to 100 buses, organised in the following format:
Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Advertisement | Former Deployment
This approach seeks to balance different perspectives, and to be more mobile friendly, as I am uncertain why some users are strongly opposed to these changes.
Alternative Table Layouts:
- Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Former Deployment (Maintain status quo)
- Batch | Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Former Deployment (Merging of Batches, numerical order, maintain status quo)
- Batch | Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Advertisement | Former Deployment (Merging of Batches, numerical order)
Please let me know your thoughts on these proposals. Thank you for your time and feedback.
Regards, Supernutorcrazy