User talk:CastJared

Opinion

Hi,

Thank you for sharing your feedback on the proposed changes earlier. I am pleased to inform you that the bus spotting page has been launched, which I believe will assist editors in verifying deployment accuracy and enhancing the reliability of current deployment information.

To address concerns regarding potential false entries on the spotting page, I trust in the integrity of our editors to avoid posting hypothetical or inaccurate information. Additionally, I have implemented features such as Date/Time stamps and Editor attribution to reinforce accountability.

Regarding the subpages, I have launched the following: Scania K230UB (Euro IV) (Batch 2). Deployment details have been transferred to the respective subpages.

As a trial, I finalised the layout for the first subpage: Scania K230UB (Euro IV) (Batch 2)/1, incorporating your valuable feedback.

Please confirm if the following criteria are met:

1. Clear visibility and usability on mobile devices.
2. Ease of information references.

If you have additional suggestions for improving the subpage layout, please do not hesitate to share your input. Thank you for your time and constructive feedback.

Regards, Supernutorcrazy

Undo of Edits

Hi,

I had undo your edit on Bus Deployments by Service, as I do not want to be flamed by critics for implementing disorientation into this page for the following:

1. Feeder service

• Choa Chu Kang: Template:Bus/300 Template:Bus/301 Template:Bus/302 Template:Bus/307

This make it looks like there is two seperate town called "Choa Chu Kang". That is the reason why it will only be reflected when ALL pages is converted in it.

2. Express service

• Express: 10e 12e 14e Template:Bus/30 43e 89e Template:Bus/97 Template:Bus/174 188e Template:Bus/196 502 502A 851e 854e 868E Template:Bus/951 960e 963e Template:Bus/982
• Express Services 506 - 518A

This at a glance is nothing wrong, but person with OCD will criticised me for saying, why the service numbering is not in order.

I hope you understand the rationale behind my undo.

Regards

Merging of Euro Emission & Batches

Hi,

Do you think we should merge the Euro Emission and Batches as we moves to subpage. This make it easier to link from Deployment by service pages back to model, and bus community will find it easier to find/track a bus rather than remembering the batches.

So it will be like this:

Registration no.	Deployment	Batches (Optional Column)	Advertisement	Former Deployments

Bodywork differences such as Volvo B9TL CDGE/WEG/Gemilang will not be affected, similiarily to 2D/3D variants.

Images

Hi,

As explained before, my words have been taken out of context and severely misunderstood. I took some time off and spent time explaining to Alphabetlorefan on my precise stance on the issue.

Thanks and Regards