Difference between revisions of "User talk:Erwinlee95"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→SBS3645X deployment: new section) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Hello Erwinlee95, | Hello Erwinlee95, | ||
I understand that you reverted my edits that SBS3645X is a perm of BRBP 90,and changed the deployment back to BRBP 157, however I still spot it quite frequently on 90. May I have some evidence that SBS3645X still perms BRBP 157 only, and why | I understand that you reverted my edits that SBS3645X is a perm of BRBP 90,and changed the deployment back to BRBP 157, however I still spot it quite frequently on 90. May I have some evidence that SBS3645X still perms BRBP 157 only, and why you believe the bus is not a perm of 90? | ||
Thanks and regards, | Thanks and regards, | ||
AirFan19 | AirFan19 | ||
Revision as of 16:55, 24 March 2021
Welcome to Erwinlee95 user talk page, SBS6604U, SG5745P, SMB43L & TIB1073R are the buses that I rep which each of them are in different prefix for PTOs, feel free to post up clarifications here. Thanks.
SBS3645X deployment
Hello Erwinlee95,
I understand that you reverted my edits that SBS3645X is a perm of BRBP 90,and changed the deployment back to BRBP 157, however I still spot it quite frequently on 90. May I have some evidence that SBS3645X still perms BRBP 157 only, and why you believe the bus is not a perm of 90?
Thanks and regards,
AirFan19