Difference between revisions of "User talk:8549H"
(→BNDEP Citaros: new section) |
(Typo) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
From what some of my friends observed in the wake of the redeployments, 6878X is now perming 293, and 1125E is perming 14. | From what some of my friends observed in the wake of the redeployments, 6878X is now perming 293, and 1125E is perming 14. | ||
As a result, is it possible to clarify why you believe the above deployments took place? | As a result, is it possible to clarify why you believe the above deployments did not took place? | ||
Thanks and regards | Thanks and regards | ||
AirFan19 | AirFan19 | ||
Revision as of 14:21, 8 July 2021
According to your logic, with so many pending changes and unknown details about CR151 and by creating that page, what about CJ151, C851E etc.? I purposefully deleted and remove those page because nothing had been finalized. Not even an actual train set had been manufactured. How can we be that sure? Just like how bus models page was created after the first vehicle come into registration, train model will follow the same, with page name (future) being listed instead of hyperlink or created.
BNDEP Citaros
Hi there,
Understand you technically reverted my edits on the redeployments on some of the BNDEP Citaros.
From what some of my friends observed in the wake of the redeployments, 6878X is now perming 293, and 1125E is perming 14.
As a result, is it possible to clarify why you believe the above deployments did not took place?
Thanks and regards
AirFan19