Difference between revisions of "User talk:Haram"
(→Important: new section) |
|||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Alphabetlorefan1 | Alphabetlorefan1 | ||
== Important == | |||
Hi Haram, I know you are editing based on your observations but in fact you missed out the former deployments. It is very important to update these former deployments but you refuse to do that and thats why I had to keep reverting your edit. Please dont make me do it again when you are told to update former deployments. Also why are you giving me unfriendly offensive words when you undo my edit just now? Its not funny so dont do that again. One more unfriendly offensive words to me and I will report you to an admin. Please understand what I am saying. | |||
Thanks, | |||
[[User:Alphabetlorefan1|Alphabetlorefan1]] ([[User talk:Alphabetlorefan1|talk]]) 17 July 2024, 15:29 |
Revision as of 15:29, 17 July 2024
!
|
Warning Point (19 April 2024) | !
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
You have committed the follow offense that may warrant an immediate ban: False Information (Cameo into Service 167)
Including the clause that states Any "Double Decker" Bus to Service 167 where DD is Cameo and not perm. |
Re:
Hi,
Regarding your claim, as I am in charge of the Rail section, you may need to ask the other administrator for their advices. As far as I can see, the image proof that you had shown to me was insufficient to justify a ban as
- (1) I can't see the registration plate on the instagram picture, anyone can post a random #hashtag to justify its claim
I had a fair share of mis-identifying the train car (and hence trainset) when glacing from afar, so I would not accept the picture proof.
Regards
Recent Edits
Hi refer to the SG6241U, the previous user is saying that SG6241U is sharebus duty with 51 and 161. SBS Transit has introduced a sharebus system.
DDs on 858
Hi just to clarify that that bus 858 DDs are cameo.
Regards,
Alphabetlorefan1
Important
Hi Haram, I know you are editing based on your observations but in fact you missed out the former deployments. It is very important to update these former deployments but you refuse to do that and thats why I had to keep reverting your edit. Please dont make me do it again when you are told to update former deployments. Also why are you giving me unfriendly offensive words when you undo my edit just now? Its not funny so dont do that again. One more unfriendly offensive words to me and I will report you to an admin. Please understand what I am saying.
Thanks, Alphabetlorefan1 (talk) 17 July 2024, 15:29