User talk:Alphabetlorefan1

About Me

Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond. But wait, before you leave a message here, read this first:

1. No spamming
2. Be respectful to me
3. Do not type any nonsense messages
4. If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
5. Don't troll me

Thanks

Notice of Free to use Sgwiki images for svc 10x series

Hi,

To support and help speed up your work, the following images are free for your use.

File:SBS8650Y 100.jpg
File:SBS8162P 101.jpg
File:SG5956Y 102.jpg
File:SBS8680K 103.jpg
File:SG3023C 105.jpg (permission sorted out and asked from owner)
File:SG3105A 107.jpg
File:SG6356Y 107M.jpg
File:SBS7608C 109.jpg

This is to increase productivity for work on the new bus service pages and decreases the time needed to search for other images online.

I will also work on speeding up the upgrade of bus stop templates.

One more thing to add on, images should have destinations displayed, not just numbers or greetings.

Thanks and Regards

Update

Hi, this is to fully confirm that you can start work on 100, 105, 107/M and 109. Thanks and Regards

Reply

Hi,

Thanks for the heads up. If you have time to spare, would appreciate your assistance in upgrading other bus service pages.

Thanks and Regards

Stop undoing edits to my talk page.

I have read your edits to my talk page, can you please stop undoing them FFS? I get really annoyed if you revert edits to my talk page and I have already mentioned in the edit summary that I have read and understood them.

Controversial edit on Alexander Dennis Enviro500 3-Door

Please do not introduce controversial material into articles without first discussing it on the article's talk page. Your edits may appear to some to be vandalism and disruptive, and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

Regards,

Edit warring

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

CastJared, add in something about edit war.

See there:

An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions. Editors engaged in a dispute should reach consensus or pursue dispute resolution rather than edit war. Edit warring is unconstructive, creates animosity between editors, makes consensus harder to reach, and causes confusion for readers. Users who engage in edit warring risk being blocked or even banned. An editor who repeatedly restores their preferred version is edit warring, regardless of whether those edits are justifiable. Claiming "My edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is not a valid defense.

There is a bright line known as the three-revert rule (3RR). To revert is to undo the action of another editor. The three-revert rule states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material, on a single page within a 24-hour period. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside of the 24-hour slot will usually be considered edit warring. There are certain exemptions to the three-revert rule, such as reverting vandalism or clear violations of the policy on biographies of living persons; see below for details. The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly; it is not a definition of "edit warring", and it is absolutely possible to engage in edit warring without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so.