User talk:Gjxl1303: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Kay (talk | contribs)
Kay (talk | contribs)
Line 85: Line 85:
*SG5140J, it was a typo error
*SG5140J, it was a typo error


==2 May==
===2 May===
*SG5573T: Did you really see SG5573T running on 7 at about 1pm today? Because that's an SMRT bus and you mention it running on an SBST service. You probably mixed it up with SG5570B or SBS7573T
*SG5573T: Did you really see SG5573T running on 7 at about 1pm today? Because that's an SMRT bus and you mention it running on an SBST service. You probably mixed it up with SG5570B or SBS7573T



Revision as of 15:56, 2 May 2025

Adding links to Bus Deployments by Package

ok pls do so, will definitely be rlly usedul.

Solution for Downroute Trips

I have made a solution found in Bus Service 173 what changes do you want to be mase before I put this table in every page that has a special departures and for future pages with Special Departures.

Special Departures

  • Template:BS42099Template:BS43009
    • Weekdays: 05:30 & 05:44
    • Saturdays: 05:35
      • Remarks:
        SBS298J & SMB3001M (All Duty Unkown) depart on Weekdays 0530 & 0544 hrs respectively.
        SMB3001M (Duty Unkown) departs on Saturdays 0535 hrs.
  • Template:BS42159Template:BS43009
    • Weekdays: 05:40, 05:49 & 05:58
      • Remarks:
        3 Service 173 Buses (All Duty Unkown) depart on Weekdays.
  • Template:BS17009Template:BS43009
    • Weekdays & Sundays/Public Holidays: 06:00, 06:15 & 06:30
      • Remarks:
        3 Service 173 Buses (All Duty Unkown) depart on Weekdays & Sundays/Public Holidays

proposed solution taken from Bus Service 173 if you know the duty just fill it in like so above. this is not actual information. Do make changes if you want to. Table method would be better instead of it being in one line

Thanks for solution. -Gjxl1303

Opinion

Hi,

Thank you for sharing your feedback on the proposed changes earlier. I am pleased to inform you that the bus spotting page has been launched, which I believe will assist editors in verifying deployment accuracy and enhancing the reliability of current deployment information.

To address concerns regarding potential false entries on the spotting page, I trust in the integrity of our editors to avoid posting hypothetical or inaccurate information. Additionally, I have implemented features such as Date/Time stamps and Editor attribution to reinforce accountability.

Regarding the subpages, I have launched the following: Scania K230UB (Euro IV) (Batch 2). Deployment details have been transferred to the respective subpages.

As a trial, I finalised the layout for the first subpage: Scania K230UB (Euro IV) (Batch 2)/1, incorporating your valuable feedback.

Please confirm if the following criteria are met:

  1. Clear visibility and usability on mobile devices.
  2. Ease of information references.

If you have additional suggestions for improving the subpage layout, please do not hesitate to share your input. Thank you for your time and constructive feedback.

Regards, Supernutorcrazy

Reply

Hi,

Thank you for your feedback. The purpose of the subpages is to minimise the need for extensive scrolling, as highlighted by many editors, particularly on mobile devices.

I will give serious consideration to your proposal for including direct links to the respective subpages from the main deployment page, as this could impact the presentation of the specification table.

The legends within the subpages are currently referenced from the main page (like a template). I am evaluating whether we should adopt a unified, simplified template for legends to be used across all deployment by model pages.

Regards, Supernutorcrazy

Merging of Euro Emission & Batches

Hi,

Do you think we should merge the Euro Emission and Batches as we moves to subpage. This make it easier to link from Deployment by service pages back to model, and bus community will find it easier to find/track a bus rather than remembering the batches.

So it will be like this:

Registration no. Deployment Batches (Optional Column) Advertisement Former Deployments

Bodywork differences such as Volvo B9TL CDGE/WEG/Gemilang will not be affected, similiarily to 2D/3D variants.

Bus Spotting Errors

23 Mar 2025

  • SBS8242Y: SBS8240Y or SBS8242S? Both are under HGDEP
  • SG6102P: What bus is that on 851?

20 April

  • SBS3047C: SBS3045C or SBS3047Y? SBS3045C is from BBDEP and SBS3047Y is from SWDEP and 147 is dual depot controlled as BBDEP & SWDEP
  • SBS6422G: SBS6412G or SBS6422C?
  • SBS8906E: You meant SBS8908E isit?
  • SG5140K: What rego do you mean? Reply so you know

Reply

  • Meant SBS3045C
  • SBS6412G, the G looked a bit similar to the C in my head, sorry
  • Yeah, Visualisation error ig
  • SG5140J, it was a typo error

2 May

  • SG5573T: Did you really see SG5573T running on 7 at about 1pm today? Because that's an SMRT bus and you mention it running on an SBST service. You probably mixed it up with SG5570B or SBS7573T

Stop removing people's spottings

Hi Gjxl1303, it has come to my attention that you are removing people's spotting list, especially my one. I will say this again don't remove people's spotting list. You actually removed one of my spotting and replace it with your own. Also your fellow BusFan74 had reminded not to remove the spotting list as mentioned here but you still keep doing it. Listen to what they say: Do not remove. Please remember this in the future or I will make a complain to the admin. Reply if you see this and apologize to whoever spottings you removed

Thanks

Alphabetlorefan1 (talk) 22 April 2025, 17:37

Reply

I am sure you saw my message but you still doing it: https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=SgWiki:Bus_Spotting/24_April_2025&curid=49931&diff=685501&oldid=685422