User talk:CastJared: Difference between revisions
Archiving. |
→Bus spotting: Fixed format again |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
|SBS0000B | |SBS0000B | ||
|168 @ 05:15 | |168 @ 05:15 | ||
| | |[[User:CastJared]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 08:48, 24 May 2025
Reply
Dude why do you have to accuse me of edit war? I did nothing not even edit warring. I was just replacing an image to make it look better. Little did you know that Flickr images have the All Rights Reserved on it? This means that those images must have permission to upload and Facebook images are fine because thats why. Do you have intentions? Do use the google lens to identify the images I uploaded and ensure where it come from
RobloxXF
You need to use a credit when you upload a image from a Website. Here's an example of this image:
There is a summary there: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2213245405363609 @ Little Red Dot Buses on Facebook
How come your photo hae low quality? Anyways about edit warring, you keep accusing me of this? You think I am doing edit war? You see, a lot of people in SgWiki helped in uploading images and replacing them with specific reasons. Also for LTG images, the website stated that all non-commercial use of our photos are welcome. But with you finding a non-watermark images might not look good and have trash quality. In fact, I search for some images they have higher quality. Please withdraw your remarks to me on my talk page. It was not supposed to happen this way
RobloxXF
Side note: Do you need Wekelwrady to speak to you about what you wrote on my talk page? He can explain to you more about edit warring in fact I didnt do anything. He will say something to you
No.
Bus spotting
Hi, since you always create bus spotting pages, why not go out and bus spot? The format should be followed like this:
| Registration Plate | Bus Service & Time | Spotter |
|---|---|---|
| SBS0000B | 168 @ 05:15 | User:CastJared |
Jade is trying to start an edit war on his talk page
You know what to do CastJared.
At least if it reaches the three-revert rule.
"There is a bright line known as the three-revert rule (3RR). To revert is to undo the action of another editor. The three-revert rule states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material, on a single page within a 24-hour period. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside of the 24-hour slot will usually be considered edit warring. There are certain exemptions to the three-revert rule, such as reverting vandalism or clear violations of the policy on biographies of living persons; see below for details. The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly; it is not a definition of "edit warring", and it is absolutely possible to engage in edit warring without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so."
Reply
Anyways about edit warring. I clearly didn't state that. Please don't blame me on edit warring in which I never did such a thing. Refer to [1], I have never made any edit war. I think you want to sue SgWiki but I don't know either. Please, it's not supposed to happened that way
RobloxXF