User talk:Alphabetlorefan1
!
|
Warning Point (19 April 2024) | !
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| You have committed the follow offense that may warrant an immediate ban: False Information (Cameo into Service 167)
Including the clause that states Any "Double Decker" Bus to Service 167 where DD is Cameo and not perm. | ||||||
About Me
Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond.
Re: Picture
Hi,
I solved it for you by converting it to png.
Re:Important
Hi,
Just saw your message on my talk page. I would like to apologise for the harsh tone I spoke with.
However, I would also like to point out that I **CANNOT** update former deployments for deployments that are untrue. This is a count of vandalism and as you know yourself, sgWiki has some people who intentionally vandalise the page with untrue deployments.
Take SBS3921Z for an example, the bus has never been on the 117 roster and it was edited by an editor who never had reliable credibility. Hence, it brings out a question mark if the deployment was ever true. SBS3921Z has always been on 114 previously, but went into an MIA state, where it never left Hougang Depot. However, it is still rostered under 114 even when it was no longer seen on 114, hence, I did not make the change from 117. Because if I were to declare it on another service or a spare bus, it would be incorrect too, because on the timetable schedule, SBS3921Z is still under 114, but in reality, HGDEP deploys a random DD on that slot, mainly SBS3826R.
I would also like to point out that I also do update former deployments for buses that are only true and rostered by the affected bus operator, please see the edit below for proof:
You undid many edits of mine in the past, mostly due to former deployments. There is a reason why it was not followed, if not the liability would be on me, as I am the one who made the most recent change. I do also notice you tend to speak in a bossy tone, which I took offence to but merely kept quiet. I also would like to clear some information based on the remarks of this edit:
https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=MAN_NL323F_(Euro_VI)&diff=prev&oldid=604294
I don’t owe you a living nor do you need to stroke your boss-like ego by saying “I'm not accepting this edit until you have updated the former deployments”. I don’t answer to you, you’re not anyone close to me, you’re just a random stranger on the internet.
Also, if you want to take this up to the admins, I have nothing to say. But I hope that admins can also see my point of view here.
Thanks for reading.
Regards, Haram
Re: User:SMN4840M
Thanks for updating me on this. It is quite clearly not my account as I have only ever used this account and I do not even edit such things which are okay in the first place. Furthermore, the admin has already banned these accounts made by the same person so it should be fine now.
Thanks,
LTA Bus Irrationalisation
184 and 302 bendy buses
Hi, do help to KIV if 184 and 302 bendy buses that are still interchangeable. Also I have seen some 176 perm buses running on 190 often/some days. Need help to observe if its still interchangeable thanks.
RobloxXF