Difference between revisions of "User talk:SBS3107H"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎B5LH: new section)
Line 41: Line 41:
may i know why this B5LH page is locked? any reasons?
may i know why this B5LH page is locked? any reasons?
i tot there is already a policy to ban users who anyhow edit? so why still need to lock the page?
i tot there is already a policy to ban users who anyhow edit? so why still need to lock the page?
== Bukit Merah Package ==
Dude, for your information, those services  that are dual depot are still dual depot as of today, despite the hand over of Bukit Merah Package

Revision as of 15:13, 18 November 2018

Service 258

Good Afternoon SBS3107H,

Please note that Service 258, which was introduced under the BSEP serving within Jurong West estate is not classfied under the Jurong Industrial Services. Only Services 246 - 257 are under the Jurong Industrial Services.

Inform the users editing sgWiki to not merge Service 258 deployment & history information over to Jurong Industrial Services classfication.

Thanks.

--Apex-LW'21 (talk) 17:29, 22 November 2015 (SGT)

reverting 807 and 860

may i know what's your purpose of reverting my edit and changing it back again?

With regards to the use of en dashes when indicating multiple consecutive regos

Greetings.

I do not know if you have come by my talk page back in August 2016 [1], but I would like to say that it has already been a settled rule that hyphens instead of en dashes are to be used when classifying consecutive bus regos. The simple reason is that putting them in proper usage, there should be no spacings before and after the said en dash. This would result in confusion even with the spacings. Strictly speaking, there is no reason to depart from the established rule. So I would like to ask if you may wish to change them back to hyphens, or consult the adminstrator and seek a declaration to depart from the established rule. Thank you.

--ASA1234 (talk) 11:55, 28 December 2017 (+08)

Clarification on reason of ban of user

Hello

It had come to my attention that you had banned User Alan 9220 for vandalism of BPJ feeder pages. May I know, although the information is correct, why is there a need to revert it?

I believe you do not know this, but this guy has information on the duties. Hence, I don't see the need to ban this user. Also, with the locking of pages, it is already getting extremely difficult to edit information for us ordinary users. I've already given up on editing several pages since they've been locked. Some information are also outdated. It's already good enough if someone kind who have information help to update the pages.

My apologies if I make you feel bad, especially with all the rules and ban here ban there since no choice ever since the period of time when vandalism kept happening. Hope you will reconsider the ban for that user, and thank you for keeping sgwiki tidy as an admin

Have a good day --TIB965Z (talk) 10:46, 16 June 2018 (+08)

B5LH

hi

may i know why this B5LH page is locked? any reasons? i tot there is already a policy to ban users who anyhow edit? so why still need to lock the page?

Bukit Merah Package

Dude, for your information, those services that are dual depot are still dual depot as of today, despite the hand over of Bukit Merah Package