Difference between revisions of "User talk:SG5064X"

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== 979/M ==
-Hi
-I was thinking that it doesn't make sense to combine 979 & 979M together because they were introduced as 2 different svcs.. Fleet deployment may be like 859/A/B, but unlike svc 859A/B, 979M have its own number plate at bus stops..
-plus it will create mess aka confusion since we have to explicitly state whats 979 and 979M eg..
-* Service 979M will use any 2 979 MAN NL323F Buses Daily.
-* Duty 979AP08 & Duty 979AP09 for Weekday and Duty 979AP07 & Duty 979AP08 for Weekend run as 979M.
-What do you think? Cheers --[[User:SMB3163D|SMB3163D]] ([[User talk:SMB3163D|talk]]) 20:56, 4 June 2017 (+08)

Revision as of 11:02, 5 June 2017