Difference between revisions of "User talk:Wekelwrady"
Wekelwrady (talk | contribs) |
Wekelwrady (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
1. Two different routes, not one. | 1. Two different routes, not one. | ||
2. Not to be confused with the feeder services, which do 1 loop. | 2. Not to be confused with the feeder services, which do 1 loop. | ||
3. for 2 loops, two rows must be stated clearly. | 3. for 2 loops, two rows must be stated clearly. | ||
4. thus removing the template form. | 4. thus removing the template form. | ||
5. But I have NO INTENTION of offending the editor, and apologise to him for the inconvenience caused. | 5. But I have NO INTENTION of offending the editor, and apologise to him for the inconvenience caused. | ||
6. However, please stick to one row for each loop, NOT one row for all loops. Thank you. | 6. However, please stick to one row for each loop, NOT one row for all loops. Thank you. | ||
Revision as of 21:18, 29 October 2017
Just discuss below.
Reply
Hi,
The rule are there for the reason. As things got messed out by those disruptive users with pages fully locked, there are two possible solutions to go about.
1. Consolidate the information and request the administrator to do for it in one shot (Once per day as stated in the rule Chapter 5 Paragraph 2). Tge exemption is there for the reason.
2. Use the respective talk page to share what suppose to be changed.
However, overtime, the pages will revert back to its original permission status. So rest assured, its just a temporary situation all other editors facing.
With this inplace, we had noted fewer abuser and disruptive editors in sgWiki but it still far to conclude the effectiveness in such curbing now.
I hope that I had provide you answer regarding your questions. Please feel free to ask me any other question you have regarding the rules.
Regards
Thanks & Regards
--Supernutorcrazy (talk, administrator) 16 Oct 2017 18:31 SGT
Reply read on 16 Oct 2017, 20:04 SGT, in response to question to Supernutorcrazy on 16 Oct 2017, 17:34 SGT
A note to a person on why i undo the template for townlinks
1. Two different routes, not one.
2. Not to be confused with the feeder services, which do 1 loop.
3. for 2 loops, two rows must be stated clearly.
4. thus removing the template form.
5. But I have NO INTENTION of offending the editor, and apologise to him for the inconvenience caused.
6. However, please stick to one row for each loop, NOT one row for all loops. Thank you.