Difference between revisions of "SgWiki:Reorganising of Bus Service Deployment by Service (Poll/Discussion)"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{| style="margin:0 auto 10px;min-width:300px;" cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 width=80%
__NOTOC__
!width=70 height=50 bgcolor=#FEE rowspan=2|<div class="triangle" style="background-color:#F00;color:#FFF;">!</div>
{| class="warning_red" style="margin:0 auto 10px;width:60%" cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0
!colspan=5 bgcolor=#FEE style="font-size:150%;"|<u>VOTING INSTRUCTIONS</u>
!width=70 height=50 bgcolor=#FEE rowspan=2|<div class="triangle">!</div>
!width=70 height=50 bgcolor=#FEE rowspan=2|<div class="triangle" style="background-color:#F00;color:#FFF;">!</div>
!style="font-size:150%;"|<u>POLL ENDED</u>
!width=70 height=50 bgcolor=#FEE rowspan=2|<div class="triangle">!</div>
|-
|-
|bgcolor=#FEE|<big>
|style="text-align:center"|<big>The poll had been closed.</big>
*Please enter your opinion below the heading '''Your Opinion Below'''
*'''For your vote to be qualified, please insert your vote (option text or number) beside or after your name in clear implication.''' The list of voting options are:
**1 - Group by Service Number (No Change)
**2 - Group by Depot
**3 - Group by Package
**4 - Abstain / To be discuss at a later date.
*You may refer to the '''Option Elaboration''' for a detail description of options.
*'''Do note that you may cast your vote for only 1 option.''' This is due to the fact that each options are unique.
</big>
|}
|}


==Poll Result==
==Result==
{{SgWiki talk:Reorganising of Bus Service Deployment by Service (Poll/Discussion)}}
Thank you for voting. The bus service deployment by service will remain as it is.
 
==Option Elaboration (Example only / Not Finalised Heading)==
*1 - Group by Service Number (No Change)
**Prefer to group service number in ascending order according to operator only.
**Page rename exercise will occur if transfer of services to other operators took place under Government Contracting Model.
**'''Services 61 - 110:''' 61, 67, 75, 110
**'''Services 167 - 190:''' 167, 169, 171, 172, 176, 178, 180, 184, 187, 188, 190
*2 - Group by Depot
**Prefer to group service number in ascending order according to operator and depot.
**Page rename exercise will occur if transfer of services to other operators took place under Government Contracting Model.
**'''Services 61 - 75:''' 61, 67, 75 (Kranji Depot)
**'''Services 110 - 171:''' 110, 167, 169, 171 (Ang Mo Kio Depot)
**'''Services 172 - 190:''' 172, 176, 180, 184, 188, 190 (Kranji Depot)
**'''Services 178 - 187:''' 178, 187 (Woodlands Depot)
*3 - Group by Package
**Prefer to group service number in ascending order according to bus package only.
**Page rename exercise will not occur if transfer of services to other operators took place under Government Contracting Model.
**'''Services 61 - 75:''' 61, 67, 75 (Choa Chu Kang – Bukit Panjang)
**'''Services 110:''' 110 (Sengkang – Hougang)
**'''Services 167 - 171:''' 167, 169, 171 (Sembawang – Yishun)
**'''Services 172 - 190:''' 172, 176, 180, 184, 188, 190 (Choa Chu Kang – Bukit Panjang)
**'''Services 178 - 187:''' 178, 187 (Woodlands)


==Starter Post==
==Starter Post==

Latest revision as of 20:23, 14 April 2020

!
 POLL ENDED
!
The poll had been closed.

Result

Thank you for voting. The bus service deployment by service will remain as it is.

Starter Post

While we're at this renaming exercise, may I also suggest creating a vote to regroup the services page from service numbers to depots? (Eg. SMRT AMDEP 110,167,169,171,853,853M,854) This is to facilitate easier editing especially for those people who are editing mostly from the same depot.

~ SimonLim88

  • 2 - Group by Depot

Your Opinion Below

Opinion 1

While I think this is not a bad idea to faciliate better edits knowing that AMDEP buses practice random deployments most of the time, I feel that it should remain as it is so as to not neglect the other services from other depots. It would be best to standardise it with those of other operators and depots as well. It would also be weird to categorise it by depot as seen in the example as Kranji Depot would appear twice which is unusual.

Hence, I will fully support Option 1.

~ Themystery

  • 1 - Group by Service Number (No Change)

Opinion 2

Option 1.

~ SMB315C

  • 1 - Group by Service Number (No Change)

Opinion 3

Leave all as it is

TIB965Z

  • 1 - Group by Service Number (No Change)

Opinion 4

Leave all as it is

lemon1974

  • 1 - Group by Service Number (No Change)

Opinion 5

Leave all as it is.

GoAheadAmbassador

  • 1 - Group by Service Number (No Change)

Opinion 6

Leave all as it is.

Erwinlee95

  • 1 - Group by Service Number (No Change)

Opinion 7

Leave all as it is.

Ian Lim

  • 1 - Group by Service Number (No Change)
Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=SgWiki:Reorganising_of_Bus_Service_Deployment_by_Service_(Poll/Discussion)&oldid=476694"