Difference between revisions of "User talk:962"
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I don't see why user 'TIB832Z' deserve such remarks when you were the one who missed out the former deployments. | I don't see why user 'TIB832Z' deserve such remarks when you were the one who missed out the former deployments. | ||
Thanks & regards | |||
== Former deployments == | |||
Hi. | |||
This is not the first time you missed out editing former deployments. Don’t make other users edit former deployments when you’re supposed to sync and do it yourself. This is part of sgwiki guidelines. And don’t think you can anyhow throw offensive remarks to whoever undo your edit because you are the one who is in the wrong. This is no place to fool around. Anymore childish behaviour from you I will report to admin. | |||
Thanks & regards | Thanks & regards |
Revision as of 08:56, 23 July 2022
Regards to SG5605K and SG6268T
Hi there,
I don't usually observe route 25 on a regular basis as I don't live along this route. Maybe you can observe further and/or check with other bus spotters living along the route of bus 25? Anyways, the CDGEs that permed 25 are not due for early retirement for now unless there are reliable sources to validate this.
Regards,
Razerboii.
Reminder
Hi.
Please be mindful of your words when editing.
I don't see why user 'TIB832Z' deserve such remarks when you were the one who missed out the former deployments.
Thanks & regards
Former deployments
Hi.
This is not the first time you missed out editing former deployments. Don’t make other users edit former deployments when you’re supposed to sync and do it yourself. This is part of sgwiki guidelines. And don’t think you can anyhow throw offensive remarks to whoever undo your edit because you are the one who is in the wrong. This is no place to fool around. Anymore childish behaviour from you I will report to admin.
Thanks & regards