Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"
Wekelwrady (talk | contribs) |
m (Remove Message requesting ban for false deployment (bus) <-- Please find alternative admins Thanks) |
||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
As discussed before, I agree that there is indeed a need for a file sharing system, especially for icons. Thanks and Regards | As discussed before, I agree that there is indeed a need for a file sharing system, especially for icons. Thanks and Regards | ||
Revision as of 16:07, 16 April 2024
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
- Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
- Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
- Please do not ask for permission to do something.
- Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
- When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
- Affected sections code
- Advertisement in full
- Affected parts to change in details.
- Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
- Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
- I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.
Leave your message below
Rail Wiki Expansion
Hi Supernutorcrazy,
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.
Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades
Hi,
I think in the long run, it is still best to display the entire line as the degree of disruption may vary nonetheless.
As for an entire line breakdown, sections with parallel bus services make dispersal and waiting time less complicated.
However, it is rather strange that going between South & North, between East & West it's faster and easier to get alternatives due to the availability of TEL and NSL respectively (I am not sure how many FBBs Pasir Ris to Boon Lay one has to go for a whole line breakdown), while it's much harder and haywire finding alternatives for origin/destinations within the same area in the West and North sections.
For eg. due to the changes within Canberra town, the route to the next station Sembawang is only faster by FBB than by 117/M. Another example would be how travelling West from Tiong Bahru is only available via 33 and 122 which barely touches the next few stations westward.
I suggest that we can add footnotes for the above aforementioned stations that FBB is faster.
Would also like to request to delete the older revisions of File:W2T CityHall-Esplanade.png and File:JurongEast_LocalDirectory as I managed to figure out on editing and resolution sizing, thanks!
Wiki plans
On a side note, I welcome the changes to add tourism elements to the wiki. Prior to that I also had listed down getting pictures for public amenities in the Planning Areas page, when I have the free time, I will revamp again.
Reply: Fleet Size of 912
Hi.
I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.
Concourse and exit layout WIP
Bedok draft has been sketched from Photoshop, and I am on my way to collect more icons, and will make a visit to Admiralty probably next week to trial a similar layout.
Current elevator dimension is 160x160 on a side note.
As discussed before, I agree that there is indeed a need for a file sharing system, especially for icons. Thanks and Regards