Difference between revisions of "User talk:Shinjuku184"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎CCK deployments: new section)
(→‎302A deployment: new section)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 103: Line 103:
Hi Shinjuku184,
Hi Shinjuku184,


Appreciate your observations and insights as a CCK-BP bus spotter myself. However, there had been several instances where your edit were merely based on one off appearance and hence it does not reflect the accurate information on the perm deployment arrangement. For instances, you have previously edited 5026D as a KJ 184 and 5037Y as KJ 190 perks when these buses only cameod on those routes a few times only. These buses have permed 190 and 67 since debut and are currently some of the most sticky DD perms on their respective routes.  
Appreciate your observations and insights as a CCK-BP bus spotter myself. However, there had been several instances where your edit were merely based on one off appearance and hence it does not reflect the accurate information on the perm deployment arrangement. For instances, you have previously edited 5026D as a KJ 184 and 5037Y as KJ 190 perms when these buses only cameod on those routes a few times only. These buses have permed 190 and 67 since debut and are currently some of the most sticky DD perms on their respective routes. Moreover, their current adverts were meant for 190 and 67 respectively as well.


Additionally for Feeder 302, appreciate your inputs on the various deployment observations. Your edit on 5959P and 5962D are definitely right as these buses have been doing 302 for quite a while on their regular slots. However from my observation, 5930X and 6110P only started appearing very recently, more so for 6110P which have been quite sticky to 172 throughout this year. 6110P only started appearing on non Bulim KJ svcs like 190 and 302 lately and as of this month, I do see it on 190 other than 302 quite a few times too. As for 5930X, can KIV for now but for 6110P I don’t think it’s not a 302 perm from various perspectives. Would be appreciated if the deployment edits aren’t as impulsive especially given the fact that bus deployments aren’t very permanent these days with BCM.
Additionally for Feeder 302, appreciate your inputs on the various deployment observations. Your edit on 5959P and 5962D are definitely right as these buses have been doing 302 for quite a while on their regular slots. However from my observation, 5930X and 6110P only started appearing very recently, more so for 6110P which have been quite sticky to 172 throughout this year. 6110P only started appearing on non Bulim KJ svcs like 190 and 302 lately and as of this month, I do see it on 190 other than 302 quite a few times too. As for 5930X, can KIV for now but for 6110P I don’t think it’s not a 302 perm from various perspectives. Would be appreciated if the deployment edits aren’t as impulsive especially given the fact that bus deployments aren’t very permanent these days with BCM.
Line 109: Line 109:
Thank You!
Thank You!


Cheers,
Cheers.
SG5064X
 
== 302A deployment  ==
 
Hi hi,
 
Just some heads up, what determine a crossover is not by the bus but by the duty as mentioned to you previously. Yea it is common place that 1637S is on 302A in morning, but as a matter of fact it is not in duty sheet. Also you indicate it as 302A perm, but that slot are commonly seen run by other buses like 1647M and other B3 A22. Also on days 1637S run on 302A, PM spilt the same BC would be driving the same bus on 190. According to DDU, it is 190-35.
 
Cheers.

Latest revision as of 00:00, 28 November 2024

6 SDs during Weekdays AM Off peak but during PM Peak, more SDs seen operated on the service. As of 5:55pm, 2 SDs spotted in CCKI, 1 SD at BP towards KBT, 1 SD at Stevens towards KBT, 1 at Bencoolen,2 SDs parking at KBT and 1 at Stevens towards CCKI, 1 x-over to 300 during PM peak

190 Saturday number of SDs[edit]

Based on observation, 190 number of SDs on Saturday all the while have been same quantity since 2021 as SDs still perform on their usual duty, including 2 SDs that does their respective interline. Whether is 4 SDs or not will KIV.

Re: 302x190 SG6244L[edit]

As a matter of fact, most of the time, yes.Occasionally is bendy. When I take the bus on that slot, DDU block number is a 302 block number. Highly suspect 6244L is a S shift. Since 15 Feb 2021, when the crossover was added; this slot has always been AM spilt on 302(till late morning/afternoon), then PM OS to KJD then about 4pm OS to CCKI and does 2 trips 190. Most of the time is 6244L.

Also, for 1574 or 1575 usually is 190x302A interline, cos i take these buses frequently on 190 on PM Peak and DDU block is 302-190-35; 302A PM Peak SDs I saw are quite random. Cos sometimes the same duty can swap bus also for AM/PM. But will KIV if it is interline from 300, 970 or 976 etc.

Re: Short Trip 302A[edit]

Thanks for the detailed info.976-302-XX do update me on what time it appear so that I can take note of it. As for 121U and 122S, will KIV if it does 302A cos most of the times I saw random A22 like 1648K or KJ Spare one. Didn’t see same BC with same bus performing other route during other past of the day.Meanwhile this evening for 188 SDs cross to 302 I saw is 1581T.

184x302/A crossover[edit]

Hi hi just asking if this crossover exist, what block number is it on?

184 and 302 bendy buses[edit]

Hi, do help to KIV if 184 and 302 bendy buses that are still interchangeable. Also I have seen some 176 perm buses running on 190 often/some days. Need help to observe if its still interchangeable thanks.

RobloxXF

Reply[edit]

Any updates on the observation of the bendies? Also, you were right about 176 & 190 buses, these buses from 190 are running on 176 while the opposite service runs on the same service as of the few days.

RobloxXF

Re:190x302A[edit]

I took the bus on that block number numerous times. Usually that slot doesn’t use 190 perm SDs. The way for us to determine if the crossover exist is through duty sheet with the help of DDU. Many times, this slot use random A22. When I take on 190 is also random A22 such as 1574P and 1637S etc.

SG6073M[edit]

Just want to enquire what time does 6073M OS after doing last trip of 302???

302/302A deployment re-confirmation[edit]

Hi, like to check if the bus DDU block number or confirm their duty number before the edit. Because crossovers such as 300x302 seemingly cease for years . 300 duty sheet has never change and that I see no 300 BCs with same bus interline 302 before.

Also, to confirm, the 188x302A is it based on DDU block number and/or duty sheet confirmation?

Btw, the other day I took 1578D on 190 with the block number 302-190-35 and that duty since July 2022 schedule change is to crossover to 302A in the morning.

Re: 302/302A deployment[edit]

Thanks for the detailed reply. Yup based on observation today, it is confirm that 300 duty does perform crossover trip to 302.

But for the so called 1 SD according to DDU should be 302-190-35 because there are duty sheet to prove that crossover exist. That duty of 190 do not use perm SD but a random A22 and at times, OC500LE.

As for the 188 one, would be glad if you can help to observe the duty sheet or DDU block number so as to double confirm because based on previous bus spotting on Service like 975B it can be tricky because certain bus seem like always 67 Weekend perm DD but upon verifying the duty and DDU, is a 975B individual duty. But I would choose to stick to the idea of 188x302A exist from the bus spotting pattern you observe.

The most accurate way by default is always a duty sheet with DDU block number as a support or back up but it can be tricky because certain 190 interline slot like 190x67 on Sundays have block number written as 190-190-XX and 903x902 as 903-903-XX.

Cheers and have a good day.

CCK bus deployment[edit]

Hi hi,

Yup 6244L is indeed 301 perm. I think for now 6025C function as a standby perm.

5871H likely a crossover for 190x979; has been suspecting for long time. Have been doing 979 AM peak but seemingly on 190 in the afternoon/evening peak. Likely a S shift interline duty for 190.

5014M and 5042G also likely a standby perm. KIV 1501A a standby perm as well these days. Only perform when any of the SDs like OC perm is down.

3572G I think still 176 perm but interchangeable which is why you see on 190. KIV 5061B perm 190 instead. Sunday also KIV does 190x67 crossover during night time.

Also, with the schedule change for 302, it is likely 8 AM - PM and 3 S1. Cos the 302x190 is a S shift duty. Morning till noon at 302 while evening peak 2 trips is 190.

Cheers TIB1152X 190

Re: CCK deployment

302x190 does 2 trips the 1616 hours and 1748 hours. Nowadays is cameo as 6073M nowadays on 190. KIV that bus as a 190 standby perm. As 190 has nearly 10 standby DD perm, it is not surprise to see E500 running around. As for 5769X is a 190 perm as I saw recently with the new Ad. 5019,5032 also 190 perm. 190-39 is a S shift perm formally a block for 190x971 interline till that service withdrawn. 302 x 190 is 302-302-XX.

SMB84T perm status[edit]

Hi hi,

SMB84T is a 190 perm bus ever since the new Citylife ad. It has been consistently doing 190 S shift and sometimes on AP . Rotate on same slot with SMB104U.


Re:SMB84T[edit]

Thanks for the input and your effort. But 84T was on 190 AP slot this week on 190-20 on Tuesday. The cases of 84T on 972 this week is like 1489C on 302 or 1402C on 300, few days streak cameo. 190 3 OC perm are seen rotating shift for now(84T, 104U, 107L)

As for 3613, it should be a spare bus cos it is seen on 67,985,184,176 etc.

Perm bus[edit]

5026D still saw on 190. As someone taking 184 everyday, I can safely say that 5026D almost didn’t appear. It only cameo a few day streak last month in October. It is commonplace for 190 DD to perform on 184.

Also, maybe to reiterate the definition of perm bus—appear for a fixed period of time, 3613Y appear on and off for past days. This bus so far from observation, it is not part of the roster.

Cheers.

CCK deployments[edit]

Hi Shinjuku184,

Appreciate your observations and insights as a CCK-BP bus spotter myself. However, there had been several instances where your edit were merely based on one off appearance and hence it does not reflect the accurate information on the perm deployment arrangement. For instances, you have previously edited 5026D as a KJ 184 and 5037Y as KJ 190 perms when these buses only cameod on those routes a few times only. These buses have permed 190 and 67 since debut and are currently some of the most sticky DD perms on their respective routes. Moreover, their current adverts were meant for 190 and 67 respectively as well.

Additionally for Feeder 302, appreciate your inputs on the various deployment observations. Your edit on 5959P and 5962D are definitely right as these buses have been doing 302 for quite a while on their regular slots. However from my observation, 5930X and 6110P only started appearing very recently, more so for 6110P which have been quite sticky to 172 throughout this year. 6110P only started appearing on non Bulim KJ svcs like 190 and 302 lately and as of this month, I do see it on 190 other than 302 quite a few times too. As for 5930X, can KIV for now but for 6110P I don’t think it’s not a 302 perm from various perspectives. Would be appreciated if the deployment edits aren’t as impulsive especially given the fact that bus deployments aren’t very permanent these days with BCM.

Thank You!

Cheers.

302A deployment[edit]

Hi hi,

Just some heads up, what determine a crossover is not by the bus but by the duty as mentioned to you previously. Yea it is common place that 1637S is on 302A in morning, but as a matter of fact it is not in duty sheet. Also you indicate it as 302A perm, but that slot are commonly seen run by other buses like 1647M and other B3 A22. Also on days 1637S run on 302A, PM spilt the same BC would be driving the same bus on 190. According to DDU, it is 190-35.

Cheers.