Difference between revisions of "User talk:SBS3720L"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Service 27==
== Reply: 161 Deployments ==
Hi.


Hi,
Thanks for taking your time to synchronise all of your edits. Really appreciate it.
1) For Service 115 - there's actually 3 buses. But more like 2 full-day & 1 extra during Peak Hours (= 3 buses).  
Because if you actually track each trip on the timetable, during AM Peak if there's only 2 buses, so means 1st 3rd 5th timing from 1st stop Kovan Hub = 1 bus, and 2nd 4th 6th timing = the other 2nd perm,


The 0757hrs bus that dep Kovan Hub needs to reach back Kovan Hub after 1 full-trip by 0822hrs. But yet the 6th timing on schedule from Kovan Hub (which I said in the line earlier, we assume it's the 2nd perm if there's only 2 buses in the fleet), departs at 0823hrs.  
However I have reverted all edits made for services 80 89 102 161 163 as user '962' has added several false redeployments, like full A95 fleet for 161 which is obviously not true.


I think it's quite impossible for SBST to deploy any BC and make him have only a 1-min break (which is more like 15secs by the time all the pax alight & empty from previous trip). There's a few other of such timings throughout the day during the Peak Hours, so logically it means that during Peak Hours, at the very least there is 3 buses definitely. But beyond Peak Hours, there's only 2
I believe they want to clock the A95 mileage on 161 and redeploy those high mileage buses to the other services.


I can help reinstate all of your edits, assuming that they are true.


2) Then going back to (1), 6802P is still HG 115 all along. Guess some of us miscalculated the intervals earlier in the year & thought that bus was out (when it was still perm 115 all along). 6870S on the other hand should be for HG 27 (that means it joins 6726B but 113's fleet numbers don't tally)
You may go ahead and change the deployments accordingly as well if you'd like to.


3) HG is indeed covering some of the gaps on Sv 27 with their existing SP buses. So for stuffs like 6616K 6706J (which are SPs by right), KIV them first
Thanks.


== Sharebus ==


Regards,
Hi, are you aware that SBST has introduced a sharebus system? that 6046E should be a sharebus rather than a crossover looking at the post
SBS9631X
 
-------------------------------
== HGDEP buses parking in Sengkang West Depot ==


Hi SBS3720L,
Hi SBS3720L,


The purpose of moving the A95 pages into different batches is to reduce/better editing with fewer buses.
23ispolo here. I have noticed recently that you picked up on HGDEP pasting red circle stickers on some of their buses recently, specifically those parking in Sengkang West Depot (SWDEP) according to you.
 
I had also taken into consideration of how pages links, and relink most pages accordingly, to the point that one could easily find the new link at [[Bus Deployments]].


With that in place, I had already ensured that it can be traced and guided to unless you are using other linkage that you are using.
I would like to add on some other buses I noticed having the sticker:


If you are refering to revision history, please note that excessive history will be cleared regularly.
'''SBS3053D (HGDEP 74)'''<br>
'''SBS3694D (HGDEP 74)'''<br>
'''SG5325T (HGDEP 147)'''<br>


Please take not that you are liable for a ban due to '''Creating unneccessary/redundant page'''. Please feel free to use my talk page for any clarification.
As you can probably tell, other Hougang Ctrl Int services (even those not from SKG-HG package) will be or are already parking in SKDEP at the moment.


Thanks&Regards
Iirc '''SBS8675B (HGDEP SP)''' and '''SBS3704J & SBS3761T (HGDEP 153)''' also have the sticker, but I will confirm and update if I see those buses again anytime soon. Pardon my bad memory over certain things like such small details.


{{AdminMsg|Supernutorcrazy|21 Sept 2017|0639}}
That said, let me know about any concerns you may have over this information or message, and if you are okay with me (and potentially other users) responsibly editing your user page to add on to your current compilation of HGDEP buses with the red sticker.


==September 2017==
Thanks and cheers!
Hi SBS3720L,


The recent edits you have made today has some matters that I need to take concern which is not updating the Buses in depots section of Scania K230UB (Batch 2 Euro IV) and Former Deployments of Scania K230UB (Batch 2 Euro IV). Please remind yourself in the future to do so.
Regards,<br>
23ispolo


Thanks.
===Reply to your message===


[[User:(SBS3107H)|<b><font color="red" size="3px">SBS</font><font color="purple" size="2px">3107H</font></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:SBS3107H|<font face="Comic Sans MS"><font color="orange" size="2px">talk</font></font>]]</sup> 18:15, 25 September 2017 (+08)
Hi SBS3720L,


Hi SBS3107H, i totally forgot about that while editing. Its been a busy day today due to the mass re-deployment of buses between hougang and amk(25 sep 2017). For some i didnt edit because it was subjected to be confirmed as first day cant seem to confirm everything. But for confirmed ones, that slipped out of my mind.  
Thanks for your prompt reply to my first message above. I just read it after finishing editing a few Scania K230UB pages.
(New to the talk feature so idk how to use it.)


==Google Search Result==
You are right that redeployments should be expected from HGDEP. In fact, like your observations of HGDEP buses show, HGDEP is already currently redeploying buses based on their assigned packages (e.g. SKG-HG, SER-EUN).
Hi,


Now with the clarification, I understand your feeling when Google Search went completely out. You may wish to feedback to Google directly. However, as with page transfering/distribution, some link from Google will remain broke till up to 1 months as the Bot from Google need to crawl and collect the correct link information and data.
That is why you see buses like SBS6090B, SBS6147Y & SBS6237X, which all permed SKG-HG services before 109/315, are now all on 27 (which is under SKG-HG package). Another example of a recent redeployment following packages is the swap between SBS6133L (to HG 140) & SBS6623P (to HG 112), which now places them on services belonging to their originally assigned packages (SER-EUN and SKG-HG respectively).


This is beyond our point of control. Please channel your feedback to Google directly.
I believe we will see more of the red stickers, and even more redeployments happening right before our eyes in the coming weeks. Of course, with so many redeployments and transfers happening now, only time will tell what will finally go to SWDEP, and what SBST's north-east deployments will look like in the near future.


Thanks&Regards
Cheers, and thanks for reading! Merry Christmas in advance to you, your family and friends!


{{AdminMsg|Supernutorcrazy|26 September 2017|0632}}
Regards,<br>
23ispolo

Latest revision as of 01:19, 23 December 2024

Reply: 161 Deployments[edit]

Hi.

Thanks for taking your time to synchronise all of your edits. Really appreciate it.

However I have reverted all edits made for services 80 89 102 161 163 as user '962' has added several false redeployments, like full A95 fleet for 161 which is obviously not true.

I believe they want to clock the A95 mileage on 161 and redeploy those high mileage buses to the other services.

I can help reinstate all of your edits, assuming that they are true.

You may go ahead and change the deployments accordingly as well if you'd like to.

Thanks.

Sharebus[edit]

Hi, are you aware that SBST has introduced a sharebus system? that 6046E should be a sharebus rather than a crossover looking at the post

HGDEP buses parking in Sengkang West Depot[edit]

Hi SBS3720L,

23ispolo here. I have noticed recently that you picked up on HGDEP pasting red circle stickers on some of their buses recently, specifically those parking in Sengkang West Depot (SWDEP) according to you.

I would like to add on some other buses I noticed having the sticker:

SBS3053D (HGDEP 74)
SBS3694D (HGDEP 74)
SG5325T (HGDEP 147)

As you can probably tell, other Hougang Ctrl Int services (even those not from SKG-HG package) will be or are already parking in SKDEP at the moment.

Iirc SBS8675B (HGDEP SP) and SBS3704J & SBS3761T (HGDEP 153) also have the sticker, but I will confirm and update if I see those buses again anytime soon. Pardon my bad memory over certain things like such small details.

That said, let me know about any concerns you may have over this information or message, and if you are okay with me (and potentially other users) responsibly editing your user page to add on to your current compilation of HGDEP buses with the red sticker.

Thanks and cheers!

Regards,
23ispolo

Reply to your message[edit]

Hi SBS3720L,

Thanks for your prompt reply to my first message above. I just read it after finishing editing a few Scania K230UB pages.

You are right that redeployments should be expected from HGDEP. In fact, like your observations of HGDEP buses show, HGDEP is already currently redeploying buses based on their assigned packages (e.g. SKG-HG, SER-EUN).

That is why you see buses like SBS6090B, SBS6147Y & SBS6237X, which all permed SKG-HG services before 109/315, are now all on 27 (which is under SKG-HG package). Another example of a recent redeployment following packages is the swap between SBS6133L (to HG 140) & SBS6623P (to HG 112), which now places them on services belonging to their originally assigned packages (SER-EUN and SKG-HG respectively).

I believe we will see more of the red stickers, and even more redeployments happening right before our eyes in the coming weeks. Of course, with so many redeployments and transfers happening now, only time will tell what will finally go to SWDEP, and what SBST's north-east deployments will look like in the near future.

Cheers, and thanks for reading! Merry Christmas in advance to you, your family and friends!

Regards,
23ispolo

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS3720L&oldid=645692"