User talk:TTEDC

Reply

Hi TTEDC,

Noted on your concern. I will think of another solution. If you have better solution, please do not hesitate to voice out. As the trial is to reduce the number of columns to make it less clutter, and yet maintain fleet registration still in numerical order, regardless of operators. One such initiative is the implementation of liveries within the registration number column.

RE: SWD or SKD

Hi there, I currently do not have any confirmation of said info. SKD was used because it was changed to SKD by someone else when I put as SWD, back when overnight parking started at Sengkang West in 2024.

For a more accurate info, I suggest u check the onboard DDU of buses from Sengkang West.

In any instance if it is SWD, there should be a function to change all at once. If there isn't, can copy and paste into Google docs before finding.

Hope this helps.

Thanks.

Opinion

Hi,

Thank you for sharing your feedback on the proposed changes earlier. I am pleased to inform you that the bus spotting page has been launched, which I believe will assist editors in verifying deployment accuracy and enhancing the reliability of current deployment information.

To address concerns regarding potential false entries on the spotting page, I trust in the integrity of our editors to avoid posting hypothetical or inaccurate information. Additionally, I have implemented features such as Date/Time stamps and Editor attribution to reinforce accountability.

Regarding the subpages, I have launched the following: Scania K230UB (Euro IV) (Batch 2). Deployment details have been transferred to the respective subpages.

As a trial, I finalised the layout for the first subpage: Scania K230UB (Euro IV) (Batch 2)/1, incorporating your valuable feedback.

Please confirm if the following criteria are met:

1. Clear visibility and usability on mobile devices.
2. Ease of information references.

If you have additional suggestions for improving the subpage layout, please do not hesitate to share your input. Thank you for your time and constructive feedback.

Regards, Supernutorcrazy

129A/B as part of BCEP

Hi,

I noticed you removed 129A and 129B from the BCEP list. According to this LTA press release (https://www.lta.gov.sg/content/ltagov/en/newsroom/2024/12/news-releases/growing-singapore-s-bus-network-with-the-bus-connectivity-enhanc.html), 129A and B are indeed part of the BCEP. Hence, I apologise but will have to revert your edit. I hope you understand and will not take offence. :)

Regards, svc135bsoe

Regarding images with watermark

Hi, since you mentioned in the talk page of the Buses page that LTG welcomes non-commercial use of photos, it affects the infobox, which can be involved in the Google search results.

And Flickr images does not have a fine line, even when uploading with credit mentioned in the link and adding an author next to a link might have a fine line of that.

You can look here as if the file had a credited link:

I have no words to say, but if you can reply feel free

Disrupting sgWiki users

Hi,

I had noticed the growing disruptive user editing in sgWiki, but unfortunately, I was given a "ban" by @Kimminju for saying I abusing my admin right to disrupt the editing and should focus on sgWiki @ Miraheze. I seek your understanding that I will not be able to

1. delete any sgwiki Buses Main Page (except for the pages due for migration)
2. ban any user
3. revert/edit/correct/sync deployments pages

Therefore, I will be focusing on proper data control and syncing to sgWiki @ Miraheze.

Please wait for other admins to support your request.

Thank you for your understanding.

Regards

Supernutorcrazy (talk) 20:57, 4 September 2025 (+08)