User talk:Alphabetlorefan1: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
Supernutorcrazy (talk | contribs)
37,676 edits
 
(145 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
#Do not type any nonsense messages
#Do not type any nonsense messages
#If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
#If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
#Don't troll me
Do take note that I will be deleting messages after 2 weeks.


Thanks
Thanks


==Opinion==
[[File:SG5023P 21.jpg|thumb|centre|250px]]
Hi,


I would like to seek your opinion on the following proposed changes:
==Bus Redeployments (TBC)==
Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments:  


1. Launch of sgWiki Bus Spotting Page
*SG5991U - UPDEP 51 > UPDEP 132
A new page will be created daily and automatically deleted a month later. For example, "Bus Spotting/1 February 2025" would be removed on 1 March 2025. This page is intended to allow editors to document bus registration numbers without the typical edit limitations, enabling infinite edits.
*SG6187T - UPDEP 132 > UPDEP 51
*SBS8619P - UPDEP 123 > UPDEP 123M (While 123 and 123M SDs are interchangeable, I have seen this bus doing 123M a lot)
*SG3261G - GBDEP 75 > GBDEP 927 (KIV whether SG3259P is redeployed to 927 or still perm 75)
*SG3311X & SG3312T - GBDEP SP > GBDEP 920 (Should be immediately perm 920 since debut)


The primary objective is to encourage collaboration among editors and to improve the accuracy of bus deployment data in relation to their permanent services. Many users have noted that the deployment page contains inaccurate and outdated information. By using these pages, we aim to track bus operations more effectively and allocate the correct permanent services, without requiring editors to board the buses to verify duty schedules.
==Disrupting sgWiki users==
Hi,


2. Use of Subpages for Bus Model Deployment
I had noticed the growing disruptive user editing in sgWiki, but unfortunately, I was given a "ban" by [[User:Kimminju|@Kimminju]] for saying I abusing my admin right to disrupt the editing and should focus on sgWiki @ Miraheze. I seek your understanding that I will not be able to
I have received considerable feedback, mostly criticism, regarding the separation and consolidation of bus advertisements across models. Most complaints focus on advertisement changes rather than deployment accuracy, which contributes to the aforementioned inaccuracies. As such, I propose reorganising the Bus Model deployment using subpages as follows:
# delete any sgwiki Buses Main Page (except for the pages due for migration)
# ban any user
# revert/edit/correct/sync deployments pages


Example: Volvo B9TL (WEG Batch 2) will be divided into four subpages:
Therefore, I will be focusing on proper data control and syncing to sgWiki @ Miraheze.
# Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 1 – (Low Entry, SBS7700T – SBS7729L)
# Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 2 – (Low Floor, SBS3000G – SBS3099Y)
# Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 3 – (Low Floor, SBS3100B – SBS3199S)
# Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 2)/Page 4 – (Low Floor, SBS3200X – SBS3238M & SBS3269Z)


A navigation bar will be added at the top and bottom of each page, linking the respective subpages. Each page will feature a single table listing up to 100 buses, organised in the following format:
Please wait for other admins to support your request.


Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Advertisement | Former Deployment
Thank you for your understanding.


This approach seeks to balance different perspectives, and to be more mobile friendly, as I am uncertain why some users are strongly opposed to these changes.
Regards


Alternative Table Layouts:
[[User:Supernutorcrazy|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy|talk]]) 20:58, 4 September 2025 (+08)
# Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Former Deployment (Maintain status quo)
# Batch | Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Former Deployment (Merging of Batches, numerical order, maintain status quo)
# Batch | Registration No/Livery | Operator/Current Deployment | Advertisement | Former Deployment (Merging of Batches, numerical order)


Please let me know your thoughts on these proposals. Thank you for your time and feedback.
== Growing number of advertising accounts with unsafe links ==


Regards, Supernutorcrazy
Hi,
 
==Concern regarding SBS6709B on routes 129 and 293==
 
I edited the page because someone informed me that he was in a Discord server where a user once claimed that SBS6709B was always seen on route 129 instead of route 293, and that they take route 129 everyday.


Please check again on your edits. Thanks. GyecheonSageori (aka Gye) ([[User Talk:GyecheonSageori|talk,]]) 14:15, 31 December 2024 (+08)
Do I just remove the unsafe link from the userpage or all the content like what you did?

Latest revision as of 00:32, 6 November 2025

About Me

Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond. But wait, before you leave a message here, read this first:

  1. No spamming
  2. Be respectful to me
  3. Do not type any nonsense messages
  4. If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
  5. Don't troll me

Do take note that I will be deleting messages after 2 weeks.

Thanks

Bus Redeployments (TBC)

Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments:

  • SG5991U - UPDEP 51 > UPDEP 132
  • SG6187T - UPDEP 132 > UPDEP 51
  • SBS8619P - UPDEP 123 > UPDEP 123M (While 123 and 123M SDs are interchangeable, I have seen this bus doing 123M a lot)
  • SG3261G - GBDEP 75 > GBDEP 927 (KIV whether SG3259P is redeployed to 927 or still perm 75)
  • SG3311X & SG3312T - GBDEP SP > GBDEP 920 (Should be immediately perm 920 since debut)

Disrupting sgWiki users

Hi,

I had noticed the growing disruptive user editing in sgWiki, but unfortunately, I was given a "ban" by @Kimminju for saying I abusing my admin right to disrupt the editing and should focus on sgWiki @ Miraheze. I seek your understanding that I will not be able to

  1. delete any sgwiki Buses Main Page (except for the pages due for migration)
  2. ban any user
  3. revert/edit/correct/sync deployments pages

Therefore, I will be focusing on proper data control and syncing to sgWiki @ Miraheze.

Please wait for other admins to support your request.

Thank you for your understanding.

Regards

Supernutorcrazy (talk) 20:58, 4 September 2025 (+08)

Growing number of advertising accounts with unsafe links

Hi,

Do I just remove the unsafe link from the userpage or all the content like what you did?

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Alphabetlorefan1&oldid=710563"