User talk:Alphabetlorefan1: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (15 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments: | Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments: | ||
* | *SMB1376U - GBDEP 188 > GBDEP 61 (SMB1376U was spotted 4 times on a same slot since 26 March, spotted it again yesterday, but its still suspected) | ||
*SG3357P - GBDEP 970 > GBDEP 188 (KIV other SG335x BYDs are out of 970. Some of these buses also redeployed to 188 or another svc, like SG3353A) | |||
===Others=== | |||
* '''Suspected crossover from 35 to 7 (35x7 Crossover)''': Can someone help me check if the 35x7 crossover exist? Because today I saw one bus of the same rego on 35 and 7. Likely, SG6169X, I spotted the bus on 35 around 1pm at Bedok Interchange and later when I was at Dhoby Ghaut at 7pm, SG6169X is now on 7 heading towards Bedok. I know this bus rego perms 168, to replace one of the 35 perm, but help me verify if this crossover exists. It's highly suspected | |||
==Disrupting sgWiki users== | ==Disrupting sgWiki users== | ||
| Line 42: | Line 45: | ||
Do I just remove the unsafe link from the userpage or all the content like what you did? | Do I just remove the unsafe link from the userpage or all the content like what you did? | ||
== 1013 ad == | |||
Someone posted online on 18 April that the bus had the CT Gold ad, and the ad was taken down as of 2 May. | |||
Latest revision as of 01:21, 6 May 2026
About Me
Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond. But wait, before you leave a message here, read this first:
- No spamming
- Be respectful to me
- Do not type any nonsense messages
- If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
- Don't troll me
Do take note that I will be deleting messages after 2 weeks.
Thanks

Bus Redeployments (TBC)
Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments:
- SMB1376U - GBDEP 188 > GBDEP 61 (SMB1376U was spotted 4 times on a same slot since 26 March, spotted it again yesterday, but its still suspected)
- SG3357P - GBDEP 970 > GBDEP 188 (KIV other SG335x BYDs are out of 970. Some of these buses also redeployed to 188 or another svc, like SG3353A)
Others
- Suspected crossover from 35 to 7 (35x7 Crossover): Can someone help me check if the 35x7 crossover exist? Because today I saw one bus of the same rego on 35 and 7. Likely, SG6169X, I spotted the bus on 35 around 1pm at Bedok Interchange and later when I was at Dhoby Ghaut at 7pm, SG6169X is now on 7 heading towards Bedok. I know this bus rego perms 168, to replace one of the 35 perm, but help me verify if this crossover exists. It's highly suspected
Disrupting sgWiki users
Hi,
I had noticed the growing disruptive user editing in sgWiki, but unfortunately, I was given a "ban" by @Kimminju for saying I abusing my admin right to disrupt the editing and should focus on sgWiki @ Miraheze. I seek your understanding that I will not be able to
- delete any sgwiki Buses Main Page (except for the pages due for migration)
- ban any user
- revert/edit/correct/sync deployments pages
Therefore, I will be focusing on proper data control and syncing to sgWiki @ Miraheze.
Please wait for other admins to support your request.
Thank you for your understanding.
Regards
Supernutorcrazy (talk) 20:58, 4 September 2025 (+08)
Growing number of advertising accounts with unsafe links
Hi,
Do I just remove the unsafe link from the userpage or all the content like what you did?
1013 ad
Someone posted online on 18 April that the bus had the CT Gold ad, and the ad was taken down as of 2 May.