Difference between revisions of "User talk:SBS3720L"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Sharebus: new section)
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Hi SBS3720L,
== Reply: 161 Deployments ==
Hi.


The purpose of moving the A95 pages into different batches is to reduce/better editing with fewer buses.
Thanks for taking your time to synchronise all of your edits. Really appreciate it.


I had also taken into consideration of how pages links, and relink most pages accordingly, to the point that one could easily find the new link at [[Bus Deployments]].
However I have reverted all edits made for services 80 89 102 161 163 as user '962' has added several false redeployments, like full A95 fleet for 161 which is obviously not true.


With that in place, I had already ensured that it can be traced and guided to unless you are using other linkage that you are using.
I believe they want to clock the A95 mileage on 161 and redeploy those high mileage buses to the other services.


If you are refering to revision history, please note that excessive history will be cleared regularly.
I can help reinstate all of your edits, assuming that they are true.


Please take not that you are liable for a ban due to '''Creating unneccessary/redundant page'''. Please feel free to use my talk page for any clarification.
You may go ahead and change the deployments accordingly as well if you'd like to.
 
Thanks&Regards
 
{{AdminMsg|Supernutorcrazy|21 Sept 2017|0639}}
 
==September 2017==
Hi SBS3720L,
 
The recent edits you have made today has some matters that I need to take concern which is not updating the Buses in depots section of Scania K230UB (Batch 2 Euro IV) and Former Deployments of Scania K230UB (Batch 2 Euro IV). Please remind yourself in the future to do so.


Thanks.
Thanks.


Hi SBS3107H, i totally forgot about that while editing. Its been a busy day today due to the mass re-deployment of buses between hougang and amk(25 sep 2017). For some i didnt edit because it was subjected to be confirmed as first day cant seem to confirm everything. But for confirmed ones, that slipped out of my mind.
== Sharebus ==


[[User:(SBS3107H)|<b><font color="red" size="3px">SBS</font><font color="purple" size="2px">3107H</font></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:SBS3107H|<font face="Comic Sans MS"><font color="orange" size="2px">talk</font></font>]]</sup> 18:15, 25 September 2017 (+08)
Hi, are you aware that SBST has introduced a sharebus system? that 6046E should be a sharebus rather than a crossover looking at the post

Latest revision as of 12:08, 2 May 2024

Reply: 161 Deployments[edit]

Hi.

Thanks for taking your time to synchronise all of your edits. Really appreciate it.

However I have reverted all edits made for services 80 89 102 161 163 as user '962' has added several false redeployments, like full A95 fleet for 161 which is obviously not true.

I believe they want to clock the A95 mileage on 161 and redeploy those high mileage buses to the other services.

I can help reinstate all of your edits, assuming that they are true.

You may go ahead and change the deployments accordingly as well if you'd like to.

Thanks.

Sharebus[edit]

Hi, are you aware that SBST has introduced a sharebus system? that 6046E should be a sharebus rather than a crossover looking at the post

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS3720L&oldid=611774"