Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Re "858 DD": new section)
 
(138 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
<!--This section are reserved for unsolved case
== User SBS3107H ==
Hi could you remove SBS3107H as admin? I feel he doesn't deserve the admin role from the way he reverts edit for no rhyme or reason,and editing it back himself, before he starts blocking users
== User SBS3107H ==
to add on the above feedback regarding SBS3107H, i have actually make the same feedback earlier to APEX-LW21 last week. many incorrect edit by this user and also, recently he undo CORRECT edit for new registration for B5LH page and lock the page and reedit himself with the same information. why? is that B5lH section reserve entirely for him?
EDIT: ADD ON 20/3, just discover that he is doing the same for MAN A95/MAN A22 BATCH 4 PAGE. other person edits new registration (under Go-ahead) and he undo all the edit of these registrations? and he edit it back himself? so being a moderator is allowed to do this?
rgds
lemon1974
-->
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.


Line 28: Line 12:
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.


==Leave your message below==
==Leave your message below==


== RE: About the Wiki ==
===Rail Wiki Expansion===


Hi Supernutorcrazy,
Hi Supernutorcrazy,


I'm sorry to hear about the false accusations which led to the Wiki's current state, however I believe that does not mean that their "beliefs" should get in the way of maintaining order in the Wiki.
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?<br>
 
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit<br>
As much as you are "not allowed to moderate", I believe that, at the very least, sgWiki Guidebook guidelines should be enforced until Jason resolves the issue with all Administrators & involved infiltrators.
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.


I know that there are other wikis out there that are getting constantly vandalized, and it is also just as difficult keeping things in order as well as starting a whole new wiki, having to set up all pages again to provide relevant info.
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


I'm sorry if I sound imposing, but it is for the good of the wiki.


Regards,<br>DarkNight
== Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades==


== About a username change... ==
Hi,


Good evening sir,
I have finished finalising the station map for Stadium. Would thus request to delete the older versions of the map.


I was wondering if I could get a username change to a SMRT registration number. Just like how some users have bus plates in their username. Eg. SG5064X, SMB1572U etc.
I found a way to skirt through the resolution and make maps with 10 min circles. It may be difficult, but worth it depending on station.


Regards,
Thanks and Regards


SimonLim88
== Reply: Fleet Size of 912 ==
 
==Re: Please assist in verify edit==
Hi.
Hi.


Thanks for the heads up.
I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.
 
I'm unsure whether this particular bus perms Sv70. However it is frequently spotted on both Sv70 & Sv162M.
 
== Typo in Travel Advisory ==
 
Hi Supernutorcrazy,
 
I am leaving you this message regarding a grammatical error in the travel advisory in the section of the relocation of Jurong East Bus Interchange.
 
In the second and last point, it states that services 78, 97, 97e and 197 will be “shorten” to etc instead of “shortened”. Looking at the other points, the past tense was used so I feel that this is a grammatical error.
 
I am sorry for disturbing you regarding this tiny error but it will be great if it could be taken into consideration. Thank you!!
 
Regards,
Jonathanchu
 
== Regarding user : Stonks ==
 
Hi,
 
I'm writing this topic in regards to a user whose name goes by "Stonks". He added many information to wiki pages which are not true to present timing. I will list some examples in this list to show his acts of vandalism. Correct me if I'm wrong, no one is allowed to add new information UNLESS they have been put into revenue service.
 
'''MAN ND323F (Batch 5)'''
 
1) He claimed on 30 September that there were new buses delivered to LTA Storage with 1 being delivered to HGDEP.
 
https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=MAN_ND323F_(Batch_5)&diff=prev&oldid=494938 (SG6189M > HGDEP // SG6190H - SG6206Y > LTA Storage)
 
2) He then proceeded to add in a new set of registration numbers ON THE SAME DAY to LTA Storage Buses without valid evidence that either they were in Seletar Depot or in any other storage locations.
 
https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=MAN_ND323F_(Batch_5)&diff=prev&oldid=494939 (SG6207U - SG6214Z > LTA Storage)
 
'''SMRT Non Revenue Buses'''
 
3) He added SMB30Z (KJDEP 176 at time of edit) to SMRT Non Revenue Buses list while the specified bus was not in the laid up corner, or rather no accidents were known.
 
https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Mercedes-Benz_OC500LE&diff=prev&oldid=497128
 
'''City Direct 660'''
 
4) He claimed that SG5900H & SG5917K were out of 660 while I spotted them physically at Shenton Way.
 
https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=City_Direct_Services_651_-_672&diff=500118&oldid=500049
 
5) He added SG6173H as an 856 perm without editing other pages properly such as Trunk Services 825 - 860 and other relevant pages.
 
https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=MAN_ND323F_(Batch_5)&diff=prev&oldid=498426


Thank you for reading this post. I do hope you consider taking action against him as this is not his first offense after noticing he has a warning point on his discussion page.
== Re "858 DD" ==


Yours sincerely,
I thank you for the message. Just to put it on record, I have no issues with the revert, which I find completely justified (as you've laid out on the false impression part), and I would've removed/changed the message as well. However, the message that Alphabetlorefan1 said "bus 858 DDs are cameo" was an erroneous one, as they are not cameos, which you've also recognized that there are downroute slots. Hence I felt there was a need to correct the user so as to prevent any misunderstandings in the future.


SG6070X
AirFan19

Latest revision as of 20:21, 17 May 2024

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
  • Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
  • I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.

Leave your message below[edit]

Rail Wiki Expansion[edit]

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.

I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades[edit]

Hi,

I have finished finalising the station map for Stadium. Would thus request to delete the older versions of the map.

I found a way to skirt through the resolution and make maps with 10 min circles. It may be difficult, but worth it depending on station.

Thanks and Regards

Reply: Fleet Size of 912[edit]

Hi.

I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.

Re "858 DD"[edit]

I thank you for the message. Just to put it on record, I have no issues with the revert, which I find completely justified (as you've laid out on the false impression part), and I would've removed/changed the message as well. However, the message that Alphabetlorefan1 said "bus 858 DDs are cameo" was an erroneous one, as they are not cameos, which you've also recognized that there are downroute slots. Hence I felt there was a need to correct the user so as to prevent any misunderstandings in the future.

AirFan19

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Supernutorcrazy&oldid=613732"