Difference between revisions of "User talk:CastJared"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Re:Elkie Tee==
==Amended vs Extended==
I had permenant ban the user for his inappropriate rage, and directed anger. Regarding his recent edit on ADL 3 Doors and SG6361G, please verify if what he claimed is true. The earlier undos that I made is fully because of failure to update former deployment. However in this case, the user did fully update on all part, which you had reverted with deny and an edit warring warning. I had no idea on the spotting, so I can't gave comment if that edit is consider vandalism/false information, hence no warning point is made.
Hi,
 
You’re right that "extended" is generally preferable to "amended", as it provides clearer context—such as in the case of Service 110, where the extension to Compassvale in Sengkang makes sense and reflects the move towards Buangkok.
 
However, for Service 114, I believe "amended" is the more appropriate term. The previous starting point was Buangkok MRT, which is located just outside Buangkok ITH. So, while there is technically an extension, the route itself hasn’t changed significantly—the overall profile remains the same. Hence, "amended" better captures the nature of the change in this instance.
 
If you had noticed, I've begun updating the history by using "amended" for relocations to the same xxx Temp/ITH/Int, to better reflect that it's still the same interchange—since the bus stop code hasn't changed. This is in contrast to the previous phrasing, which used "amended to xxx Temp Int/Int/ITH" and implied a change of interchange, which isn’t actually the case.
 
Regards
 
[[User:Supernutorcrazy|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy|talk]]) 10:19, 18 April 2025 (+08)

Latest revision as of 10:19, 18 April 2025

Amended vs Extended[edit]

Hi,

You’re right that "extended" is generally preferable to "amended", as it provides clearer context—such as in the case of Service 110, where the extension to Compassvale in Sengkang makes sense and reflects the move towards Buangkok.

However, for Service 114, I believe "amended" is the more appropriate term. The previous starting point was Buangkok MRT, which is located just outside Buangkok ITH. So, while there is technically an extension, the route itself hasn’t changed significantly—the overall profile remains the same. Hence, "amended" better captures the nature of the change in this instance.

If you had noticed, I've begun updating the history by using "amended" for relocations to the same xxx Temp/ITH/Int, to better reflect that it's still the same interchange—since the bus stop code hasn't changed. This is in contrast to the previous phrasing, which used "amended to xxx Temp Int/Int/ITH" and implied a change of interchange, which isn’t actually the case.

Regards

Supernutorcrazy (talk) 10:19, 18 April 2025 (+08)