Difference between revisions of "User talk:SBS3107H"
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Source of info: "Singapore Bus Enthusiasts" FB Group. Please don't tell me you don't trust FB sources and only trust those from SGF. At the very least look through arguments carefully. | Source of info: "Singapore Bus Enthusiasts" FB Group. Please don't tell me you don't trust FB sources and only trust those from SGF. At the very least look through arguments carefully. | ||
As for SMB129Z, my original source has been invalidated. Hence, I will only revert edits related to TIB481C and SMB1343P. | |||
[[User talk:ArthurJie]] 12:58, 8 December 2013 (SGT) | [[User talk:ArthurJie]] 12:58, 8 December 2013 (SGT) | ||
Revision as of 13:00, 10 December 2013
Seiko Criteria ad.
This ad. have 2 different version.1 is Wang Leehom as feat., 1 is Sammi Cheung as feat. Their captions also different, please help to clarify. Thanks! (User talk:SBS5032B) 13:13, 6 December 2013 (SGT)
Re: Clarifications
With regards to Svc 961,
1) Batch 2 MAN A22 registered will usually follow a trend that they will perm a service chronologically in order. Given SMB1342S and SMB1344L perm WL961, high chance SMB1343P perm WL961 too.
2) SMB1343P has been on doing Svc 961 for 2 months.
3) TIB481C has been running around on other services lately like a spare bus, just that it only returns on 961 for the past 2 weekends.
Source of info: "Singapore Bus Enthusiasts" FB Group. Please don't tell me you don't trust FB sources and only trust those from SGF. At the very least look through arguments carefully.
As for SMB129Z, my original source has been invalidated. Hence, I will only revert edits related to TIB481C and SMB1343P.
User talk:ArthurJie 12:58, 8 December 2013 (SGT)